1 / 13

Rockville, MD August 20 , 2008

Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) CTSA Evaluation Approach Emory University. Rockville, MD August 20 , 2008. This document is confidential and is intended solely for the use and information of the client to whom it is addressed.

joshwa
Télécharger la présentation

Rockville, MD August 20 , 2008

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) CTSA Evaluation Approach Emory University Rockville, MD August 20, 2008 This document is confidential and is intended solely for the use and information of the client to whom it is addressed.

  2. Overview of Institution’s Evaluation Goals and Objectives • In collaboration with program directors & staff, monitor and document implementation of the specific aims of the ACTSI. • Determine the effectiveness of the ACTSI in achieving both short and long term outcomes. • To assist with the national evaluation of CSTI through active participation in the national evaluation workgroup. • Provide support to program level evaluation activities as needed.

  3. Approach Process/Model/Framework to CTSA Evaluation • Establish an evaluation consortium with designated liaisons representing each of the CTSI core functions to collaboratively develop a comprehensive evaluation plan including: • key indicators of outcomes and milestones; • potential data sources; • the most feasible and effective collection methods; • and dissemination of evaluation that will inform improve program improvement and productivity.

  4. Atlanta Clinical Translational Science Institute Evaluation Framework

  5. Approach Process/Model/Framework to CTSA Evaluation Short-term outcomes • Enhance institutional and local capacity and environment for translational and clinical science by meeting specific aims and milestones of each CTSA Program. • Metrics • Collaborations, research projects, training events, pilot programs etc. • Enhanced technologies, resources, and knowledge base for clinical and translational science. • Metrics • Increased development and use of technology resources, licenses, patents and continuing educ. opportunities, dissemination of new knowledge • Skilled trainees, scholars, and researchers and career development in clinical and translational research. • Metrics • # of new scholars, researchers, development and implementation of training events/programs

  6. Approach Process/Model/Framework to CTSA Evaluation Long-term outcomes • Establishment of integrative academic home for clinical and translational science in Atlanta. • Metrics • Increased collaboration among individuals, within and across institutions and oorganizations • Promotion of CTSA within Atlanta. • Metrics • # of new collaborations, patterns of collaboration, dissemination of information throughout the Atlanta area, inquiries, service utilization, customer surveys • Increase in research productivity (grant awards, publications, presentations, collaborations, new agents, protocols, therapy tested clinical trials) • Metrics • Changes from baseline in # of successful grant applications, publications, presentations, discoveries, clinical trials, etc.

  7. Approach Process/Model/Framework to CTSA Evaluation Distal outcomes • Promotion of the rapid translation of discoveries from the laboratory to medical practice in the community. • Metrics • New & sustained collaborations, dissemination and application of research findings • Enhanced community engagement and collaboration to foster clinical and translational research. • Metrics • New and sustained collaborations partnerships, increased capacity and practice for community-based research

  8. ATCSI Request Submission Form

  9. ATCSI Request Submission

  10. Overview of Evaluation Activities Timeline Year 1 & 2 • Development, pilot testing and implementation of data collection system • APR required data • “Point of service” online tool • Creation of Institute Level Work plan & performance dashboard • Development of qualitative and customized data collection tools Year 3-5 Ongoing data collection & analysis

  11. Summary of Evaluation Metrics • Output data on # of • Collaborative projects/partnerships • New grants/investigators • Training provided/attendance • Publications • Outcomes • Changes in patterns of interaction among investigators, institutions/organizations • Community engagement • Productivity • Impact of institutional synergy in leveraging resources/information/opportunities (capacity for research)

  12. Institute’s Resources and Organization for Evaluation (including staff) • 4 Faculty at 5-20% FTE • 2 at Morehouse School of Medicine; 2 at Emory University • .5 FTE Evaluation Manager TBH

  13. Institution Evaluation Challenges and/or Questions • Leveraging limited evaluation resources • Maintaining data quality and consistency • Capturing the “transformative” impact of the ACSTI

More Related