1 / 46

Governance in CAS: Perspective of a Governance Specialist

Supporting Decentralization as an Entry Point for Governance Reform in Sierra Leone Yongmei Zhou (AFTPR) Governance and Anti-corruption Core Course (Apr 23, 2007). Governance in CAS: Perspective of a Governance Specialist.

jovita
Télécharger la présentation

Governance in CAS: Perspective of a Governance Specialist

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Supporting Decentralization as an Entry Point for Governance Reform in Sierra LeoneYongmei Zhou (AFTPR)Governance and Anti-corruption Core Course (Apr 23, 2007)

  2. Governance in CAS: Perspective of a Governance Specialist • Why and how did we choose a few entry points when governance shortcomings were pervasive? • What’s the role of a governance specialist in the Country Team? How to generate support among country team colleagues and development partners for a multi-sectoral agenda? • This presentation focuses on the accountability and empowerment story, not the growth story

  3. Sierra Leone: a poor post-conflict country • 5 million population • Civil war (1991-2002) displaced half of population, caused 20,000 death, and destroyed infrastructure and social capital • 176th out of 177 in UN HDI ranking • Infant mortality: 166 out of 1000; SSA average: 101; world average 57. • Under-5 mortality: 284 out of 1000; SSA average: 171; world average 86. • Life expectancy 37; SSA average: 46; world average: 67. • Adult literacy: 36%; SSA average: 71%; world average 80%

  4. Extreme poverty and regional inequality

  5. Causes of conflict • Post-independence deterioration in governance • Local councils dissolved in 1972 • Centralization of power, resources and corruption in Freetown • Rural population deprived of economic opportunities, education, political participation • Marginalization of youth from decision-making

  6. Numerous studies identified pervasive governance shortcomings • Studies: Governance and Anti-Corruption Survey (2003), ESW “Strategic Options for Public Sector Reform” (2004), CFAA (2002), HIPC AAP (2004), Legal and Judicial Sector Assessment (2003) • Findings • Overly centralized control of resources and lack of checks and balance • Rampant informality and corruption in public sector • Very limited capacity in public sector • Lack of citizen/business confidence in state institutions

  7. Good Governance has many entry points – the broad view today Citizens/Firms • Political Accountability • Political competition, broad-based political parties • Transparency & regulation of party financing • Disclosure of parliamentary votes • Effective Public Sector Management • Ethical leadership: asset declaration, conflict of interest rules • Cross-cutting public management systems: meritocracy, public finance, procurement • Service delivery and regulatory agencies in sectors • Civil Society & Media • Freedom of press, FOI • Civil society watchdogs • Report cards, client surveys • Formal Oversight Institutions • Independent, effective judiciary • Legislative oversight (PACs, PECs) • Independent oversight institutions (SAI) • Global initiatives: UN, OECD Convention, anti-money laundering • Private Sector Interface • Streamlined regulation • Public-private dialogue • Extractive Industry Transparency • Corporate governance • Collective business associations Citizens/Firms Citizens/Firms • Decentralization and Local Participation • Decentralization with accountability • Community Driven Development (CDD) • Oversight by parent-teacher associations & user groups • Beneficiary participation in projects Citizens/Firms

  8. What to bet on – back in 2003? Judicial Reform?

  9. IDA made a high-stake bet on devolution and empowerment • 2004, IDA $25m Institutional Reform and Capacity Building Project • 2005, JSDF $2m for strengthening community collective action & engagement with local councils • 2005, PHRD grant $900,000 for strengthening leadership of the decentralization process • Existing social action project (NSAP, 2003-2008, $35m) adopts a strategy to support decentralization and strengthen local council capacity • 2006, DfID and EU gave a $25m trust fund to the World Bank to top up IRCBP • 2006: JSDF $900,000 for an NGO providing primary justice service to rural people • 2007: Accelerated Child Survival Project ($35m) to strengthen gov health grant system and LGs capacity to deliver

  10. Create enabling conditions for effective local governance Central government enabling conditions allowing fiscal and administrative autonomy, adequate & predictable transfers, refrain from political interference, domestic accountability mechanisms Local government capacity and governance practice Citizen and business engagement open and accountable local political process, civil society and media oversight, public-private partnership Community collective action

  11. IDA also supports sustained PFM reform • PFM reform history (attached) • IRCBP and Budget Support operations supports • Legal and regulatory reform • IFMIS • Procurement reform • Local government financial management capacity building • Budget reform • This new phase of PFM reform is driven by the decentralization process

  12. What did we choose NOT to invest in? • Civil service reform: no champion • Legal and judicial reform: proposal too expensive and not convincing

  13. Why betting on a decentralization-driven governance reform program?

  14. Some criteria for a good entry point for governance reform • A good thing to do • A good time to do it • Some influential people lose sleep over it • Can lead to visible and quick enough improvement in something that people care about • Can generate further momentum and expand constituency for longer-term governance transformation Q: Was devolution a good entry point in the Sierra Leone context?

  15. A good thing to do, at least in theory • Addressing a root cause of the civil war – centralization of power and resources and resultant inequality and rampant corruption. • Opening space for political participation • More transparent and equitable resource allocation across districts • Bringing resource closer to frontline providers and hopefully better delivery • Bringing the state closer to citizens and hopefully building state legitimacy • Risk of local capture and corruption to be explicitly addressed

  16. Window of opportunity & just-in-time support • IRCBP preparation phase coincided with GoSL preparation for LG legislation and elections • Immediate engagement with newly elected LGs • Start a virtuous cycle

  17. MoF counting on fiscal decentralization to improve effectiveness of public spending • Sustained efforts to improve effectiveness of public spending in the past decade (see PFM reform history) • MoF frustrated with pervasive leakages of resources • PETS 2002: less than 10% of all essential drugs could be accounted for by District Medical Officers; less than 5% of all essential drugs were accounted for by periphery health units. • PETS 2002: only 72% teaching and learning materials reached the intended schools from District Edu Offices, arriving 170 days later than contracted. • PETS 2003: Receipt of seed rice: 8% before planting season; 35% during planting season; 57% after planting season • Establish Local Gov Finance Department to focus on fiscal decentralization

  18. Early results and effective communication are the key to expand constituency and open more doors for reform

  19. Building constituency for decentralization through LC Rapid Results Initiatives • Immediately after LC elections, central government challenged and supported each LC to identify, design, and implement one Rapid Result Initiative that was • Urgent and compelling • Visible – people will notice the difference • Can be translated into real impact in 100 days • MLGCD Decentralization Secretariat provided coaches • MoF disbursed Local Government Development Grant four months after elections

  20. LCs did not disappoint • LCs RRIs tackled diverse development issues: water, sanitation, feeder roads, bridges, traffic, rice production, post-harvest loss. Examples of results: • Travel time between Sewafe and Peya of Nimiyama Chiefdom of Kono District reduced from 1hr to 15 minutes and transportation cost reduced from Le 5,000 ($1.75) to Le 2,000 (70 cents). • Increase the availability of high-yield quick-harvest Inner Valley Swamp Rice seeds in Pujehun Districtby 4,000 bushels within 90 days • Ensure the availability of safe and portable drinking water in the mains and laterals and 25 public taps in the Moyamba township within 90 days. • Total volume of Garbage in two lorry parks and two markets in Kenema Township reduced by 90% within 95 days. • Cheaper and faster than MDA projects

  21. LCs RRIs to generate a virtuous cycle

  22. And preventing a vicious cycle of deteriorating local governance

  23. Sector RRIs to give credibility to sector devolution • Sector staff performing functions related to primary health, crops/livestock, DEC schools received orientation of the Rapid Results Approach. • RRIs developed by sector teams • Local council sector committees would monitor the progress of the sector RRIs: accountability and partnership between politicians and professionals. • Each RRI team would include members from beneficiary communities

  24. Are purse-holders aware of LG achievement and willing to further empower progressive LGs?

  25. Negotiation with MoF: improving LG budget predictability and autonomy • Increasing share of budget as grants to LGs: 4.4% non-salary non-interest recurrent budget in 2005; 8.7% in 2006; 13.2% budgeted in 2007. • Treating grants to LGs as priority budget items • Reduce cumbersome bureaucracy in grant transfer process • 237 signatures per grant per quarter * 14 grants * 4 quarterly payments/grant = 13,272 signatures a year! • Recently consolidated grants and forms

  26. Field trips to build understanding and confidence in LGs and communicate management support • Field trip in every supervision mission (joint with DfID/EC/UNDP): make both progress and challenges transparent • Feb 2006 Country Program Portfolio Retreat: participation by sector colleagues and sector managers • 2005 MD/CD visit; Jul 2006 PW visit • Mid-term review: invite sector colleagues

  27. Set standards for accessing LGDG: results from 1st Comprehensive LG Assessment Source: Comprehensive Local Government Performance Assessment (Nov 2006) Legend 5minimum conditions 4minimum conditions 3minimum conditions 2minimum conditions 0-1minimum conditions 7 Minimum conditions • Financial management • Development planning • Budgeting and accounting • Procurement • Transparency and accountability • Project implementation • Functional capacity of LG

  28. LCs adopting good governance practices, many not yet adopted by ministries Source: Comprehensive Local Government Performance Assessment (Nov 2006) Legend 70 - 88points 60 - 69 points 50 - 59points 30 - 49points Performance measures • Management, organization and institutional structures • Transparency, openness, participation and accountability • Planning systems and project implementation, M&E • Human resource management • Financial management, budgeting and accounting • Fiscal capacity and local revenue mobilization • Procurement and contract management

  29. Expanded support for LGs and investment in grant system • GoSL & IDA/DfID/EC co-finance discretionary Local Gov Dev Grant: allow LCs discretions and build in incentive in grant allocation formula. • IDA social fund (NSAP) • Feeder road component has been adjusted to provide direct financing to LGs and strengthen LGs capacity to manage public works projects

  30. District Medical Officers embraced decentralization • Primary health service delivery responsibilities devolved to LCs in 2005, along with tried grants • DMO is part of LC Management Team and a co-signatory of LC health grant account • DMO enjoys operational autonomy “Decentralization has stopped the tide of brain drain among medical professionals because we now have interesting work to do.” “Decentralization allows us to quickly respond to disease outbreaks. We don’t have to wait for the ministry.” “Decentralization means if I have a problem I can knock on the doors of our council rather than sitting on a long bench in Youyi Building for a week and waiting for an audience with a ministry official.”

  31. Health Care Services at PHUs did not deteriorate after devolution in 2005Source: IRCBP Health Clinics Surveys 2005-2006

  32. Health Care Services at PHUs did not deteriorate after devolution in 2005 (continued)Source: IRCBP Health Clinics Surveys 2005-2006

  33. IDA & DfID to transfer sector investment funds to LGs through grants system • World Bank and DfID health sector support: provide financing through GoSL LC grants system, improving M&E, supporting district health management teams to implement their sector plans and budget • DfID water sector support to follow similar approach

  34. Need to continue expanding constituency for decentralization: scope for more CT synergy

  35. Stimulating citizen demand for good governance is an area that greatly benefits from collaboration with development partners

  36. Does performance comparison lead to political competition? • Hypothesis: with a good communication program, comparative performance data can serve as • Stimulant for peer learning and performance improvement • Trigger for political competition and civic activism • Whether disseminating comparative performance information among electorates will affect political fortune of councilors remain to be seen.

  37. Good-practice LCs get award from MLGCD and bonus grants from MoF, but are people asking their laggard LCs tough questions? Legend 70 - 88points 60 - 69 points 50 - 59points 30 - 49points Performance measures • Management, organization and institutional structures • Transparency, openness, participation and accountability • Planning systems and project implementation, M&E • Human resource management • Financial management, budgeting and accounting • Fiscal capacity and local revenue mobilization • Procurement and contract management

  38. Are people wondering why councils are paying such different prices for similar furniture?

  39. Rural people start knowing their councilors but they are far more familiar with their chiefs

  40. Gender and age gaps in political awareness, activism and confidenceSource: GoBifo/IRCBP/ENCISS joint household survey in Bombali District and Bonthe District (Dec 2005)

  41. Collaborating with other projects to stimulate demand for good governance • DfID-sponsored Enhancing Civil Society and State Interface Project: “Meet the LG” Program • UN: weekly radio programs on LGs • USAID: strengthen sub-district Ward Development Committees and citizen engagement with LGs • JSDF project GoBifo: strengthen community participation in LGs and ward development planning process • JSDF grant for Timap for Justice: help rural population seek justice and change expectation of authorities • DfID/USAID/EC: voter education for 2008 LG Elections

  42. How will we know whether devolution process is a good entry point for governance reform?

  43. The goodness test • Is devolution bringing the state closer to people? • Are LGs more responsive and accountable than central government? • Does devolution improve access to and quality of services? • Does improvement in public services increase citizens’ trust in government? • Will high-performing councilors have more promising political career? • Will more competent and committed people stand for LG elections in 2008?

  44. The sustainability test • Will the project momentum be maintained? (tension between civil servants and contract staff) • Will local politicians fight against recentralization attempts? • Will competition among local governments give pressure for performance improvement? • Will local political markets allow for more credible alternatives to emerge for future national elections? • Can culture of inclusion and accountability be built from below?

  45. The Role of Governance Specialists in CAS Process • Help CT identify development outcomes that can benefit from governance improvement • Assess likelihood of success of each proposed intervention and advise a bet • Continuously reassess the bet and add wager or diversify bets as appropriate • If you want sector colleagues to make governance their business, you have to make their work your business: cross support, peer review, QER, keep them updated • Make sure you have CD/CM support! They will encourage sector colleagues to work with you

More Related