1 / 4

BBLR MD 29.07., 30.07.04

participants: G. Burtin, J.-P. Koutchouk, Y. Papaphilippou, F. Roncarolo, T. Sen, V. Shiltsev, J. Wenninger, F. Zimmermann help from BDI: J. Albertone, G. Ferioli, L. Jensen, R. Jones help from PS: E. Metral & colleagues measurements: beam loss (PMT), lifetime (BCT), wire scans,

Télécharger la présentation

BBLR MD 29.07., 30.07.04

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. participants: G. Burtin, J.-P. Koutchouk, Y. Papaphilippou, F. Roncarolo, T. Sen, V. Shiltsev, J. Wenninger, F. Zimmermann help from BDI: J. Albertone, G. Ferioli, L. Jensen, R. Jones help from PS: E. Metral & colleagues measurements: beam loss (PMT), lifetime (BCT), wire scans, tunes, orbits, 1000-turn BPM data conditions: (A) 0 BBLR, (B) 1 BBLR, (C) 2 BBLR tunes (0.174,0.153) and (0.31,0.32) scans: BBLR-2 current, BBLR-2 distance, tunes QX, QY, & scraper (failed) BBLR MD 29.07., 30.07.04 lots of data to be analyzed

  2. optimum distance ~1 mm off optimum current >= 240 A (equal to other BBLR)

  3. base tunes 0.166, 0.154 large sensitivity, both BBLRs on

  4. base tunes 0.31, 0.32 perfect compensation @0.30-0.33, little @0.27-0.28

More Related