1 / 13

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW CLASS 29

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW CLASS 29. Economic Substantive Due Process Part II March 19, 2008 . Adkins v. Children’s Hospital. Majority by: Sutherland Joined by: McKenna, Van Devanter, McReynolds, Butler Dissent by: Taft Joined by: Sanford Dissent by: Holmes Brandeis did not participate.

kailey
Télécharger la présentation

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW CLASS 29

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CONSTITUTIONAL LAW CLASS 29 Economic Substantive Due Process Part II March 19, 2008

  2. Adkins v. Children’s Hospital • Majority by: SutherlandJoined by: McKenna, Van Devanter, McReynolds, ButlerDissent by: TaftJoined by: SanfordDissent by: Holmes • Brandeis did not participate

  3. Weaver v. Palmer Bros. Co. (1926) [C p. 527] One • Majority opinion by Butler • (joined by the other 3 Horsemen: Sutherland, McReynolds, Van Devanter as well as Sanford) • Dissent by Holmes, joined by Brandeis and Stone

  4. Justices Born on St. Paddy’s Day • Roger Brooke Taney • Pierce Butler • Near misses: Ruth Bader Ginsburg (3/15), Antonin Scalia (3/11), Earl Warren (3/19), Sandra Day O’Connor (3/26)

  5. Nebbia v. New York (1934) [C p. 539] Majority by: RobertsJoined by: Hughes, Brandeis, Stone, CardozoDissent by: McReynoldsJoined by: Van Devanter, Sutherland, Butler(the 4 Horsemen)

  6. West Coast Hotel v. Parrish (1937) [C . 541] • Majority by: HughesJoined by: Brandeis, Stone, Roberts, CardozoDissent by: SutherlandJoined by: Van Devanter, McReynolds, Butler (the 4 Horsemen)

  7. United States v. Carolene Products Co. (1938) [C p. 543] • Majority by: StoneJoined by: Hughes, Brandeis, Roberts, Black (except the part designated "Third")Concurrence by: ButlerDissent by: McReynoldsReed, Cardozo took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.

  8. Williamson v. Lee Optical (1955) [C p. 545] • Unanimous • Opinion by Douglas (joined by Warren, Black, Reed, Frankfurter, Burton, Clark, Minton, Harlan)

  9. Ferguson v. Skrupa (1963) C p. 546] • Unanimous • Opinion of the Court by Black • Separate Concurrence by Harlan

  10. BMW of North America v. Gore (1996) [C p. 547] • Majority by: StevensJoined by: O'Connor, Kennedy, Souter, BreyerConcurrence by: BreyerJoined by: O'Connor, SouterDissent by: ScaliaJoined by: ThomasDissent by: GinsburgJoined by: Rehnquist

  11. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. v. Campbell (2003) [C p. 551] • 6-3 • Majority opinion by Kennedy joined by Rehnquist, Souter, O’Connor, Stevens, Breyer • Dissents by Scalia, Thomas, Ginsburg

  12. Philip Morris USA v. Williams (2007) [Supp. 83] • Opinion of the Court by Breyer joined by Alito, Kennedy, Roberts, and Souter • Dissent by Stevens • Dissent by Thomas • Dissent by Ginsburg, joined by Scalia and Thomas

  13. Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker • Oral argument: February 27, 2008 (granted expanded oral argument of 45 minutes per side – ie. an extra 15 minutes each) • Decision expected by summer • The issue is not the constitutionality under due process, rather under maritime law

More Related