1 / 31

AS SOCIOLOGY – RM

AS SOCIOLOGY – RM . INTERVIEWS . 1 minute . Run up to the white board and write down one keywords which summarises for you the concept of interviews . By the end of this topic you will be able to. Understand the differences between structured and unstructured interviews,

kalare
Télécharger la présentation

AS SOCIOLOGY – RM

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. AS SOCIOLOGY – RM INTERVIEWS

  2. 1 minute Run up to the white board and write down one keywords which summarises for you the concept of interviews

  3. By the end of this topic you will be able to.... • Understand the differences between structured and unstructured interviews, • Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the various different types of interviews, • Apply your understanding of interviews to the study of education.

  4. Facts • Interviews are another type of social surveys, • Interviews can be conducted by phone or face to face, • Interviews involve social interactions between the researcher and the participant,

  5. 2 types of interviews • Structured and formal interviews: • Interviewer under strict instructions, • Standardised questions, • Standardised interviews in terms of question order, tone of voice, etc • Unstructured or informal interviews: • Similar to a guided conversation, • Freedom to vary the questions, • Freedom to pursue any line of questioning which is appropriate at the time, • Ability to ask follow up questions and to probe more deeply. • Circourel, Kitsuse (1963)

  6. Sample in interviews • Interviews can either be done on a 1-2-1 basis or within a group setting also known as a focus group, Within which context do you believe that group interviews might be appropriate ?

  7. Reading task Using the handout, read through box 26 and complete the two questions asked individually

  8. Structured interviews • Usually have some pre set close ended questions, • Required a trained interviewer to ask the questions and record the answers, • Interaction between the interviewer and interviewee.

  9. Issues with structured interviews • Practical issues, • Response rate, • Reliability, • Validity, • Inflexibility, • Feminist criticism

  10. Practical issues • Training of the interviewers is inexpensive but the methods is more costly than using questionnaires, • Representative and can cover a large number of participants however not to the scale of questionnaires, • Data is easily quantified when using pre-set close ended questions,

  11. Response rates • Large numbers can be sample thus rendering the data gathered as representative, • Young and Willmott (1962) • Response rates can be increased by doing call back interviews, but this increases the cost of the survey, • Sample might not be representative of the whole population. Why might the sample not be representative of the whole population ?

  12. Group task In your groups read through Box 27 and complete the activity on the flipchart paper given. Be ready to feedback in 3 minutes.

  13. Reliability • If a method is reliable this means that another sociologist would be able to repeat the study and get the same results. How might interviews be seen as reliable ?

  14. Reliability • Controls : • Standardised questions, • Question order, • Question wording, • Tone of voice.

  15. Validity • A valid method is one which provides a true picture of the topic being researched. How might interviews seen as valid or non valid methods of getting a true picture of a topic being researched ?

  16. Validity • Close ended questions reduces freedom of expression, • Structured interviews gives very little freedom to clarify understanding or explain questions, • People may lie or exaggerate, • Researcher bias, • S.I seen as only giving a snapshot.

  17. Feminist criticism • Graham (1983) • S.I seen as patriarchal which give a distorted view of women’s experiences. How might this occur ?

  18. Feminist criticism • Researcher control and line of questioning used which mirrors women subordination in wider society, • Survey methods treat women as isolated individuals rather than seeing them in the context of the power relationships that oppress them, • Surveys impose the researchers categories on women making it difficult for them to express their experiences and concealing the unequal power relationships between the sexes. • Graham advocates the use of methods which will instead allow the researcher to understand women’s behaviour, attitudes and meaning such as observations.

  19. Unstructured interviews • Advantages : • Rapport and sensitivity, • Interviewee's view, • Checking understanding, • Flexibility, • Exploring unfamiliar topics • Disadvantages: • Practical problems, • Representativeness, • Reliability, • Quantification, • Validity.

  20. Rapport and sensitivity • Building a relationship of trust and understanding is beneficial as it puts the interviewee at ease and makes them more likely to share, • Labov (1973), • Useful when researching sensitive topics as the empathy and encouragement of the interviewer will help the interviewee feel comfortable.

  21. Interviewee’s views • More opportunity to speak about those things they see as important, • Production of fresh insights and valid data, • Dean and Taylor-Gooby (1992) • Gives interviewees the freedom to talk in their own terms about the issues that concern them.

  22. What do you think ? Explain the advantages of allowing interviewees the freedom to talk in their own terms? What do you see as the disadvantages of tape recorded interviews?

  23. Checking understanding • Easier to clarify a misunderstanding in U.I as it can be explained or be asked follow up questions to clarify an answer.

  24. Flexibility • U.I seen as highly flexible: • No restrictions with regards to questions that can be asked, • Ability to further explore something that comes up during U.I that could be of interest, • More open ended and exploratory,

  25. Disadvantages of U.I What might be some of the disadvantages of using U.I ?

  26. Practical problems • Time consuming, • The depth to which the researcher can go into means that the sample will have to be smaller, • Training needs to be more thorough, • Interviewer will be required to have good to excellent interpersonal skills.

  27. Representativeness • Smaller numbers required for U.I means that the sample will not be representative to the whole population, • Harder to make generalisation.

  28. Reliability • Poor reliability due to the lack of standardisation, • Each interview is unique as the interviewer is free to ask different questions to each of his participants.

  29. Quantification • Due to the use of mainly open ended questions the answers can not be pre-coded, • This makes it difficult to quantify the results thus harder to establish a cause and effect relationship.

  30. Validity • Although U.I are seen as able to produce valid data critics argue that the interaction between the researcher and interviewee can distort the information obtained.

  31. Individual task Read through pages 199 to 201 and individually complete the quick check questions on page 201.

More Related