1 / 31

Session 2 Threat Ranking

Session 2 Threat Ranking. Session Objectives. By the end of this session, campaign managers should be able to:. Identify the components of Threat Ranking Evaluate and prioritize threats by Scope, Severity & Irreversibility Rank threats in Miradi

kalila
Télécharger la présentation

Session 2 Threat Ranking

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Session 2Threat Ranking

  2. Session Objectives By the end of this session, campaign managers should be able to: • Identify the components of Threat Ranking • Evaluate and prioritize threats by Scope, Severity & Irreversibility • Rank threats in Miradi • Create a draft Threat Ranking Assessment for Expert Validation for Campaign Site Module 2, Unit 3, Session 2

  3. Where are We Now? Module 2, Unit 3, Session 2

  4. Link to ToC • Concept model => CR & record of starting point • Threat ranking => Top threat • Factor chain => Target audience • Identify range of management options • Assess management options & finalize choice of threat • Results chain => BC & ToC • BR, PCRA => Revise ToC

  5. Which is the Greater Threat? Logging or Firewood collection? Module 2, Unit 3, Session 2

  6. How to Rank Threats Consider these Factors: • Scope: Proportion of the overall area likely to be affected within given time frame by a given threat • Severity: The level of damage expected within the time frame • Irreversibility: The importance of taking immediate action to counter the threat Module 2, Unit 3, Session 2

  7. Conservation target: 100 ha forest Threat: Logging vrs collection of firewood Timeframe: 10 year Scope: Proportion of the conservation target affected by the threat Very High: 71-100% - High: 31-70% - Medium: 11-30% - Low: 1-10%

  8. Conservation target: 100 ha forest Threat: Logging vrs collection of firewood Timeframe: 10 year Severity: The degree to which the threat destroys or impairs the target Very High: destroy or eliminate the target High: seriously degrade/reduce Medium: moderately degrade/reduce Low: slightly degrade/reduce

  9. Conservation target: 100 ha forest Threat: Logging vrs collection of firewood Timeframe: 10 year Irreversibility: Degree to which the effects of the threat can be reversed Very High: > 100 years - High: 21-100 years Medium: 6-20 years - Low: 0-5 years

  10. What if the conservation target is mobile ? Module 2, Unit 3, Session 2

  11. Conservation target: Carnivorous reef fish MPA Threat: Cyanide fishing vrs spear fishing Timeframe: 10 year Scope: Proportion of the conservation target affected by the threat Where? How often? How many fishermen ? Very High: 71-100% - High: 31-70% - Medium: 11-30% - Low: 1-10%

  12. Conservation target: Carnivorous reef fish MPA Threat: Cyanide fishing vrs spear fishing Timeframe: 10 year Severity: The degree to which the threat destroys or impairs the target Impact of threat on population growth? reproductive rate? Very High: reduce its population by 71-100% within ten years or three generations. High: reduce its population by 31-70% within ten years or three generations Medium: reduce its population by 11-30% within ten years or three generations Low: reduce its population by 1-10% within ten years or three generations

  13. Conservation target: Carnivorous reef fish MPA Threat: Cyanide fishing vrs spear fishing Timeframe: 10 year Irreversibility: Degree to which the effects of the threat can be reversed Fish stock recovery time? Very High: > 100 years - High: 21-100 years Medium: 6-20 years - Low: 0-5 years

  14. Threat ranking in Miradi

  15. Exercise in Miradi Rank two threats – 20min Conservation target: Carnivorous reef fish inside Pandan MPA (130Ha) Threat: Cyanide fishing vrs spear fishing Timeframe: 10 year Cyanide fishing by 2 fishermen from neighboring community, once a month, occurs in 20% of site only, kills all fish in radius of 10-15m, catch 30kg per trip Spear fishing by 15-20 local fishermen across all of site, do not catch juvenile but catch fish >3 age, catch 10-190kg per trip Napoleon wrasse become sexually mature age 6-7, some individuals become male at 9 years old, live 25-30 years Males as big as 2m; weigh up to 190kg

  16. Identify • Highest threat and why • Assumptions • Questions / Additional information that would have been useful to have

  17. Threat ranking in Miradi

  18. Exercise in Miradi on Lola Looking at the Lola threat ranking answer the following questions 15minutes How many threats are listed in the threat ranking? And how many conservation targets? Identify the threat that scored the lowest for each conservation target Which threat scored the highest across all 4 conservation targets? Compare the threat ranking for dynamite bombing and cyanide fishing for invertebrates and for coral reef. What is the difference according to the Lola threat ranking?

  19. Out of the 3 threats that scored “high” in the summary threat ranking, which one is the highest threat to coral reef? What does the summary target rating tell you? Is there a way in Miradi to change the order in which threats are displayed in the table? Play around and see if you can find out how Imagine this was the ranking someone had done for your site. What 3 things would you agree with? What three things would you rank differently at you site?

  20. Review in reader what does good threat ranking look like p24

  21. Threat ranking for your own site • Open your site concept models in Miradi from yesterday and rank the threats at your site • Make a list of: • All the assumptions you have made while ranking the threats • Any outstanding questions / issues you would like to double check or triangulate • List people already consulted during application process on threats • Any people you have in mind that you would like to triangulate the ranking with

  22. Threat ranking graded assignment – 40 points, due Sunday 3 October 11:30 pm • Using Miradi rank the biodiversity threats to your own campaign site by scope, severity and irreversibility. • Then: • Email your Miradi (MPZ) file to Annalisa & Ariela • Take a screen shot of your Threat ranking and post it on Rare Planet as a blog, listing assumptions, outstanding questions, any people you would like to validate the TR ranking with, anyone already consulted • send it & present it to your supervisor (aim to do this during the LAP call) and ask him/them for comments

  23. Session Objectives Did we meet these objectives? • Identify the components of Threat Ranking • Evaluate and prioritize threats by Scope, Severity & Irreversibility • Rank threats in Miradi • Create a draft Threat Ranking Assessment for Expert Validation for Campaign Site Module 2, Unit 3, Session 2

More Related