1 / 18

RESEARCH, REDUCE III, X-AMINE ST, COOL-MI

RESEARCH, REDUCE III, X-AMINE ST, COOL-MI. Azfar Zaman Freeman Hospital, Newcastle. 1. R apamycin E luting S tent E valuated A t R otterdam C ardiology H ospital Rationale. Sirolimus eluting stents reduce restenosis and reintervention Increased risk of early and late stent thrombosis

Télécharger la présentation

RESEARCH, REDUCE III, X-AMINE ST, COOL-MI

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. RESEARCH, REDUCE III, X-AMINE ST, COOL-MI Azfar Zaman Freeman Hospital, Newcastle

  2. 1. Rapamycin Eluting Stent Evaluated At Rotterdam Cardiology HospitalRationale • Sirolimus eluting stents reduce restenosis and reintervention • Increased risk of early and late stent thrombosis • Are SES safe and effective in a thrombogenic environment post STEMI? RESEARCH

  3. Recruitment • 96 patients with STEMI enrolled as part of registry of SES implantation in Rotterdam • ACT>300 (200-250 with IIb/IIIa) • Clopidogrel between 3-6 months RESEARCH

  4. Results • MACE (death, nonfatal MI, reintervention) + 6 m angiogram • mean age 57y, IIb/IIIa in 46.9% • ref. diameter 2.73 ± 0.59, length 16.9 ± 9.95 mm • No early or late stent thromboses • No reinterventions and no restenosis RESEARCH

  5. Relevance • Single centre registry data but unrestricted • NICE (DES >15mm/<3mm) “except if MI in preceding 24h or evidence of thrombus” • Supporting evidence for safe use (of sirolimus) in MI – “need larger studies” RESEARCH

  6. 2. Restenosis Reduction by Cutting Balloon Evaluation IIIRationale • Failure of CB to reduce angiographic or clinical outcomes in ISR (versus standard balloon) • Can predilation with CB versus standard balloon before bare metal stent deployment reduce restenosis ? REDUCE III

  7. Recruitment • Randomised, multicentre (Japan) • 521 patients • Mean age 65 years REDUCE III

  8. Results REDUCE III

  9. Relevance • A role for cutting balloon……at last? • DES for “NICE” lesions, CB plus BMS for others • Promising…….2 years too late? REDUCE III

  10. 3. X-Sizer in AMI patients for Negligible Embolization and optimal ST resolutionRationale • TIMI-3 flow after PCI for AMI is criteria for success • But may not have myocardial perfusion due to distal embolisation • Thrombectomy can improve myocardial perfusion as assessed by ST resolution X-AMINE ST

  11. Recruitment • AMI 12 hours in patients NOT receiving thrombolysis • 56% received IIb/IIIa • 200 patients, 6 month follow-up X-AMINE ST

  12. Results • No difference in clinical outcomes X-AMINE ST

  13. Relevance • Complementary therapy to antithrombotics in AMI • Await longer term clinical outcomes data • Useful in patients in whom antithrombotics should be kept to a minimum X-AMINE ST

  14. 4. Cooling as an Adjunctive Therapy to Percutaneous Intervention in Patients with Acute Myocardial InfarctionRationale • In animal MI models, hypothermia reduces metabolic demand and infarct size • mild hypothermia inhibits platelet aggregation • test safety and efficacy of cooling (<35ºc) as adjunctive therapy to primary PCI for AMI compared to PCI alone COOL-MI

  15. Recruitment • 357 patients enrolled: prospective, randomised • Acute MI < 6 h • End-point - infarct size at 30 days COOL-MI

  16. Results • No difference in end-point of infarct size • Incidence of shock higher in cooling arm • Benefit in anterior MI cooled to <35ºc COOL-MI

  17. Relevance • Nil (at present) • More effective rapid cooling needed (difficult in humans because of large thermal mass) • Further work in anterior MI • Beta blockers? COOL-MI

  18. Thank you

More Related