1 / 8

AP US Govt PACs January 16, 2013

AP US Govt PACs January 16, 2013. Objective : Examine the growth, influence, strategies and pros/cons of political action committees. I. Growth of PACs. Definition : groups that raise funds for favored candidates WHY : “Open up” contributions  masses  more people to support your cause

kato-fernandez
Télécharger la présentation

AP US Govt PACs January 16, 2013

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. AP US GovtPACsJanuary 16, 2013 Objective: Examine the growth, influence, strategies and pros/cons of political action committees

  2. I. Growth of PACs • Definition: groups that raise funds for favored candidates • WHY: “Open up” contributionsmasses more people to support your cause • FECA 1974: • Individuals-$1000 (now $2500/inflation) • Individuals-$1000 to a PAC, no limit on #PACs • PACs-5x an individual (now 2.5), no limit on amount that a PAC can contribute/year • No limit on independent expenditures that a PAC could make

  3. II. Explosive Growth of PAC contributions • PACs-even donate to candidates facing no opposition • Most congressional campaign money comes from Individual contributions

  4. III. PAC Strategies WHERE does the money go AND WHY • Incumbents • 2004, 79% of PAC moneyincumbents • Winners-double spending • Those likely to grant access • party leader, committee chair (60 mins video)

  5. III. PAC strategies… 3. Voter education (mailings, fliers, commercials) 4. Independ. expenditures, issue advocacy ads 5. “Bundling”-many individual contributions 6. 527s Groups • Not regulated by FEC

  6. IV. Who has PACs?? • 50%=Corporations • Ideological organizations • Professional/trade/health (AMA) • Labor Unions (WEA)

  7. V. Dangers of PACs • Ethic concerns: “buying votes” • Special accessaverage person lacks • Drives up cost of campaigningfundraising • Further incumbency advantage

  8. VI. In defense of PACs • 1st amendment’s rightright to petition the government • PACs=political education

More Related