1 / 12

Navigating and Sharing in a Decentralized World

Navigating and Sharing in a Decentralized World. Francisco Matias Cuenca-Acuna http://www.panic-lab.rutgers.edu/. People. Graduate students Christopher Peery Konstantinos Kleisouris Faculty Richard Martin Thu Nguyen. Federated computing.

katoka
Télécharger la présentation

Navigating and Sharing in a Decentralized World

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Navigating and Sharing in a Decentralized World Francisco Matias Cuenca-Acuna http://www.panic-lab.rutgers.edu/

  2. People • Graduate students • Christopher Peery • Konstantinos Kleisouris • Faculty • Richard Martin • Thu Nguyen

  3. Federated computing • Current trend toward ubiquitous Internet connectivity is driving a new model of federated computing • Computing systems that are geographically distributed and may span multiple organizations • Concurrently, deep penetration of computer usage • 500 million PCs in operation worldwide (1 for every 12 people) • 80% of them are in desktops • 40% annual growth • 600 million Internet users worldwide • Federated computing appearing at every level • Social group-based sharing • P2P: Gnutella, KaZaA, DirectConnect • Web-based: Ebay, Google groups, Yahoo groups, DMOZ • Scientific computing • Many emerging research grids: http://www.gpds.org/ • Business-to-business ecommerce Source http://news.com.com/2100-1040-940713.html

  4. The challenge • Federated computing provides the opportunity to harness vast amount of resources • Consider just data sharing • Users produce 740TB of information per year • Information per person is growing continuously • 80% annual growth on total disk capacity sold per year • Emergence of huge distributed data repositories • Local community of 3000 undergraduate students sharing 20TB of data • WWW: Google had indexed 1 billion pages (20TB of content) by 2000 • The European Data Grid has only 100’s of nodes but PB’s of data • Challenge: how to manage and actually use these resources • Decentralized control • Widely distributed • Heterogeneous components Source http://www.sims.berkeley.edu/research/projects/how-much-info/

  5. The PlanetP Project • Information and resource management for networked communities • Data sharing • Provide content-based access & ranking of results • Allow user to cooperatively organize data • Provide predictable data availability • Deployment, monitoring, and management of federated services • Provide a common runtime environment • Distributively follow sysadmin guidelines for service deployment • Example: UDDI naming service for web services • Dealing with Decentralization • Self-management & self-configuration • Autonomous cooperation • Loosely synchronized global information • Randomized algorithms

  6. Current state of the project Service management Global namespace and storage management Automatic replication for availability Content indexing and ranking Data propagation

  7. Current state of the project • Based on epidemic communication • Very resilient to node/network failures • Membership management • Every node has a loosely synchronized view of the community Service management Global namespace and storage management Automatic replication for availability Content indexing and ranking Data propagation

  8. Current state of the project • Distributed information ranking algorithm • Allows search engine like queries • 2 step search & rank to deal with outdated information Service management Global namespace and storage management Automatic replication for availability Content indexing and ranking Data propagation

  9. Current state of the project • Allow users to specify data availability • Present a probabilistic availability model • Monitor availability as community changes Service management Global namespace and storage management Automatic replication for availability Content indexing and ranking Data propagation

  10. Work in progress • File system interface over communal content • Unlike the Web the namespace is writeable • Dynamic namespace management • Automated local storage management • Remove content if we can recover it • Hoarding for disconnected operation Service management Global namespace and storage management Automatic replication for availability Content indexing and ranking Data propagation

  11. Work in progress • Distributed runtime for Web Services • Administrators just dictate the policy • They reason about • capacity • availability • privacy issues • Provide self deployment and monitoring Service management Global namespace and storage management Automatic replication for availability Content indexing and ranking Data propagation

  12. The PlanetP Project http://www.panic-lab.rutgers.edu/Questions?

More Related