1 / 7

Lemert

Lemert. Primary & Secondary Deviance. Stuttering. Stuttering common amongst Indians only in one tribe and unknown in others.

kavindra-gaurhari
Télécharger la présentation

Lemert

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Lemert Primary & Secondary Deviance

  2. Stuttering Stuttering common amongst Indians only in one tribe and unknown in others. Where oratory performance was highly valued in the community (males had to achieve in this to achieve manhood) parents would react with concern & horror about stuttering. The boys nervousness would be so high it would cause stuttering.

  3. Stuttering • Primary Deviance Is the Stuttering But • The labelling of the child stutterer was important and caused nervousness and actually led to the stuttering Secondary Deviance

  4. Education • Teachers label pupils as ‘good’ or a ‘troublemaker and reward/punish them accordingly. • The consequences of labelling (secondary deviance) are more important than the original deviance!

  5. Evaluations • Too deterministic • Becker & Lemert: so for people who commit crime & are not labelled there are no consequences? Maybe more important is that when they commit these acts and get away with it is more important influence on future behaviour.

  6. Evaluations • Taylor, Walton & Young (Marxists) argue that it offers no explanations for the role of POWER and law enforcement. • Plumber rejects this saying that all it does is to show the power of MORAL ENTREPRENEURS and the results of their actions

  7. Evaluations • Fails to explain why they commit the act in the first place • They suggest that we all commit criminal acts yet there is significant research that suggests that there are differences in the probability of different groups committing crime

More Related