1 / 11

Why Does the French Revolution Involve More Bloodshed Than the American Revolution ?

Why Does the French Revolution Involve More Bloodshed Than the American Revolution ?. By Calvin L. Robinson. I chose this topic because…. I was interested in trying to understand why the American Revolution went so smoothly in comparison to the French Revolution.

keith
Télécharger la présentation

Why Does the French Revolution Involve More Bloodshed Than the American Revolution ?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Why Does the French Revolution Involve More Bloodshed Than the American Revolution? By Calvin L. Robinson

  2. I chose this topic because…. • I was interested in trying to understand why the American Revolution went so smoothly in comparison to the French Revolution.

  3. It is well known that in the American Revolution we fought for our freedom or our liberty against the British to gain our independence as our own country, while on the other hand the French Revolution was a lot different than ours. The French Revolution was not against an outside country, but against itself inside its own borders, mainly against its own monarchy. Why though, one may ask, was their revolution bloodier than the American Revolution, or why did America not fall into a “Reign of Terror” like the French? One said answer could be the simple fact that the Americans were united in a common goal to drive out an opposing force and had a type of preset government as to be led by the people in certain terms while the French were in a turmoil against themselves and therefore did not really have any governing ruling and had no type of enforcement to enforce the laws.

  4. Thesis Statement • The French Revolution was bloodier that the American Revolution, because unlike the American Revolution the French were in turmoil against themselves and did not have any governing ruling and did not have any type of way to enforce the laws that were attempted to be passed.

  5. What led to the French Revolution anyways? • The French revolution was due to the unfair taxation of the lower class French citizens; this was due to financial crises that the French was dealing with at the time which made them tax the lower class even heavier, than enforcing taxation on the middle class and upper class citizens . These financial crises were like military expenses and aristocracy, while in comparison, America had a boasting economy due to the selling and trading of slaves along with sugar and tobacco. • Once the taxes kept coming and becoming heavier, tensions began to run high among lower class French citizens and a revolt was inevitable. This was soon realized by King Louis XVI and his wife Marie Antoinette and they tried to make an escape and flee the country but were captured and ultimately killed. During the time they were killed is about when the French nation ran amuck and the so called “Reign of Terror” began.

  6. “Reign of Terror” • “The "Reign of Terror" lasted from September of 1793 to July of the following year. Simply put, the Reign of Terror was a dictatorship mainly by a group of leaders called the Committee of Public Safety, and at the head of them was a man by the name of Maximilien Robespierre. They were known for being responsible all of the executions of counter revolutionaries and so called enemies of the Republic. Over 40,000 people lost their lives to the guillotine in these yearsduring this time. Despite all of the killings, almost all of them were done without due process.”

  7. An End to the Reign of Terror and the Rise of Napoleon • Both the end to the Reign of Terror and the end of the French Revolution were brought on by the rise in power of the general Napoleon Bonaparte. He grew in power with the military and gradually began to have the country in a full 180 degree turn and set it to a republic, yet he still named himself emperor, though not in the traditional sense of the word.

  8. What did I learn from my research…? • In all I learned that the French in general did not know what they wanted once they were rid of the monarchy and in consequence fell into a nightmarish frenzy of lawlessness; this in comparison to the Americans who all in general had a common thought and goal on what they wanted even before they were completely free of a monarchy rule.

  9. Bibliography • Clark Atlanta University History Department, A History Reader. • Littleton, MA: Tapestry Press, Ltd., 2010 • Hunt, Lynn. "History Workshop Revolution in France". 15. (1983), 78- • 94, http://www.jstor.org/stable/4288460. (accessed March 3,2011). • Hooker, Richard. "The Radical Revolution." • 6/6/1999.http://www.wsu.edu/~dee/REV/RADICAL.HTM (accessed March 3rd 2011). • Kiser, Edgar and Linton, April. "The Hinges of History: State-Making and Revolt in Early Modern France American Sociological Review". 67. 6 (2002), 889-910, http://www.jstor.org/stable/3088975. (accessed March 3, 2011). • Upshur,Jiu-hwaL.. World History. 4 ed. Clark Baxter. Wadsworth, • 2005. • World History International. "The French Revolution." http://history-world.org/french_revolution1.htm (accessed March 3rd 2011). • Zuckert, Michael P. . "Self-Evident Truth and the Declaration of • Independence The Review of Politics". 49. 3 (1987), 319-339, http://www.jstor.org/stable/1407839. (accessed March 3, 2011).

More Related