1 / 9

Right 2 Privacy

A Loss of Privacy Benefits Society/More Laws are not Needed to Protect Privacy:. Finger printing those who receive any form of welfare, social security, or unemployment checks avoids people receiving numerous checks. By keeping computerized data on patients provides important information to doctors

kellsie
Télécharger la présentation

Right 2 Privacy

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

    1. Right 2 Privacy Chapter 2 ATL 135 SEC 003 Bekha Boyce Molly OBrien Rachael Poirier Jeff Veach Lauren Vendittelli (MOE)

    2. A Loss of Privacy Benefits Society/More Laws are not Needed to Protect Privacy: Finger printing those who receive any form of welfare, social security, or unemployment checks avoids people receiving numerous checks. By keeping computerized data on patients provides important information to doctors, provides organization, and security of everyone's files. Parents have the right to know what their nannies are doing while they are watching the kids.---- the majority of parents will fire their nannies afterwards. If more laws are formed about the paparazzi then the public will only hear what the government will allow us to hear. The rich and powerful people in our country take advantage their fame and win million dollar law suits as a result of the many privacy rights. public ---> tabloids ---> paparazzi ---> celebrities.

    3. A Loss Of Privacy Harms Society / More Laws Are Needed to Protect Privacy: Invasions of privacy can be treated as trespass, assault, or eavesdropping. Most invasions involve technology, wiretaps, video cameras, computer, etc. Four kinds of Privacy Rights are: Unreasonable intrusion through telephone tapping, videotaping, or through binoculars of a persons home without a person's consent. Use of a persons name without the person's consent Publication of facts, photographs, or personal relations. Publication that places a person in a false light. Now that privacy cannot easily be created by simple physical space, it is all the more important to insure the existence of private enclaves.. through new law. The government has all information form everyone in America and can use your information at anytime, without consent. States can require individuals to supply information for one purpose and then use that information for another purpose. The United States Congress will eventually pass a privacy law to limit the uses of medical information.

    4. Random Drug Tests on Student Athletes Do Not Violate the Right to Privacy: Amendment IV The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. Amendment XIV Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

    5. Random Drug Tests on Student Athletes Do Not Violate the Right to Privacy: Athletes feel that, according to the first and fourth amendments, drug tests are invading their right to privacy, however, they are wrong. In order to protect and gain control over a student body, a district must be able to override certain government laws and make their own. Many athletes argue that a drug test is also an unreasonable search and seizure, however, that's untrue because it's been proven that drug use in school has caused students to become increasingly rude in class and that drug tests are helping to gain control over them "Students who voluntarily participate in school athletics have reason to expect intrusions upon normal rights and privileges, including privacy." ( Antonin Scalia et al 89).

    6. Random Drug Tests on Student Athletes Violate the Right to Privacy: (cont.) On August 26 1997 New Jersey Superior Court Assignment Judge Sybil Moses temporarily blocked Ridgefield Park Board of Education from giving random drug tests to student athletes. On August 28 1999 in Oklahoma City a lawsuit was filed against the Tecumseh Board of Education fighting a school policy that made students take drug and alcohol tests in order to take certain academic classes. A similar case was filed in 1996 in Rushville, Indiana where a drug testing policy was instituted and students were required to take tests in order to participate in extra-curricular activities. Drug testing can cost anywhere from 20-40 dollars for low-cost solutions that are generally not very sensitive and subject to error up to 200 dollars for more comprehensive tests. The fourth amendment protects against unreasonable search and seizure.

    7. Wiretaps Violate the Right to Privacy / Wiretaps are Necessary to Fight Crime: The FBI is trying to push laws through Congress that would make it easier for them to retrieve information about innocent Americans. Many civil libertarians are arguing that if the Federal Government and FBI receive these privileges to further their overall information about American citizens that the information could end up in the wrong hands. The FBI is concurred that with the new technology that is being invented. The FBI fear that they will lose their grasp on American society.

    8. Works Cited Etzioni, Amitai. "A Loss of Privacy Benefits Society." Civil Liberties Opposing Viewpoints (1999): 73- 76. Greene Jr., Euguene D. Big Brother Surveillance/Division of E.D.G. Enterprises. <http://www.bigbrothersurveillance.net/mission.htm>. Kirtley, Jane E. "More Laws Are Not Needed To Protect Privacy." Civil Liberities Opposing Viewpoints (1999):81-84. NannyVideo.com. <http://www.nannyvideo.com>/ Plumbo, Peg. "How can I check physician safety records?" iVillage/ParentsPlace.com. 3 November 2000 <http://www.parentsplace.com/fertility/conception/qa/0,3105,14065,00.html>. "The Good and The Bad". Personal Privacy and Access to Medical Databases, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory's ELSI Project site. <http://www.lbl.gov/Education/ELSI/privacy_pros_cons.html>.

    9. Works Cited Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Privacy Council. <http://www.privacycouncil.com> Health Data Security Forum. 11/8/2000. <http://www.rightoprivacy.com/forums/health.html> How Privacy Is My Medical Information. 11/8/2000. <http://www.privacyrights.org/fs/fs8-med.htm> Privacy:Abuses:How, Why, Where. FOCUS Spring 2000. <http://www.abanet.org/publiced/focus/priv_abuses.html> Privacy Threat in Welfare Reform Bill. Independence Institute.11/10/2000 <http://www.i2i.org/SuptDocs/OpEdArc/op950801.htm> Two Models to Protect Privacy and the DPPA. 11/8/2000. <http://www.networkusa.org/fingerprint/page1b/fp-dppa-two-models.html>

    10. Works Cited Behrens, Lawrence. Making the Case: An Argument Reader. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2001. Scalia, Antonin. "Random Drug Tests on Student Athletes Do Not Violate the Right to Privacy." Civil Liberties Opposing Viewpoints (1999): 89-97. Aversa, Jeannine. "An Invasion of Privacy, Or Critical Law Enforcement Locating Cellular Calls" Associated Press. 12 November 2000 <http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/dailynews/cellular981022.html>. Delaney, Donald P. et al. "WIRETAP LAWS AND PROCEDURES WHAT HAPPENS WHEN THE U.S. GOVERNMENT TAPS A LINE". CPSR: Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility. 7 November 2000 <http://www.cpsr.org/cpsr/privacy/wiretap/wiretap.procedure.html>. "The FBI's Wish List".Wired Digital Inc., a Lycos Network site. 7 November 2000 <http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,15350,00.html>.

More Related