1 / 18

Newlon Housing Trust: Customer Satisfaction Surveys 2014/15

Newlon Housing Trust: Customer Satisfaction Surveys 2014/15. Q1-3. Contents. Methodology Customer Satisfaction survey - Summary of key results - What drives overall satisfaction Repairs survey - Summary of key results Conclusions. Methodology.

kelly-collins
Télécharger la présentation

Newlon Housing Trust: Customer Satisfaction Surveys 2014/15

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Newlon Housing Trust: Customer Satisfaction Surveys 2014/15 Q1-3

  2. Contents • Methodology • Customer Satisfaction survey - Summary of key results - What drives overall satisfaction • Repairs survey - Summary of key results • Conclusions

  3. Methodology • Research programme consists of two telephone surveys: Customer Satisfaction, and Responsive Repairs. • Fieldwork takes place on a quarterly basis, with 250 Customer Satisfaction, and 200 Repairs interviews completed each quarter. • For the Customer Satisfaction survey we interview a sample of tenants with targets set by tenure type, while for the Repairs survey we interview tenants who have had a repair completed in the last 3 months. • To ensure the results are representative of Newlon’s overall stock, the Customer Satisfaction data is weighted by tenure type (General Needs, Leaseholder, Intermediate rents) and no. of bedrooms (1, 2, 3, 4+). The Repairs data is also weighted by no. of bedrooms, as well as by contractor (Breyer, BSW Heating, R W Porter Electrical, and others). • Interviewing for Q1 took place Jan- Feb 2014, Q2 interviewing in May 2014, and Q3 in Aug 2014

  4. Customer Satisfaction Survey

  5. Satisfaction with overall service Overall Service Satisfaction - Q1-3 Overall Service Satisfaction – by wave BMG London benchmark: 67% HouseMark London average: 77% 9% Base: Q1-3 (757) Bases as shown

  6. Repairs and maintenance Satisfaction with repairs and maintenance - by wave Satisfaction with repairs and maintenance – Q1-3 BMG London benchmark: 62% 30% 10% 12% Base: Q1-3 (757) Bases as shown

  7. Overall satisfaction with home/listening to customers Satisfaction with condition of home - Q1-3 Satisfaction Newlon listens to views and acts upon them – Q1-3 BMG London benchmark: 73% 33% BMG London benchmark: 55% 22% 40% 8% 19% 10% 12% 8% 13% 73% 24% 18% Base: Q1-3 (757)

  8. Satisfaction with rent/service charge as value for money Satisfaction with rent as value for money - Q1-3 Satisfaction with service charge as value for money – Q1-3 BMG London benchmark: 65% 37% 12% 19% Base: Q1-3 (757) Base: Q1-3 (571)

  9. Satisfaction by area Significantly lower than Haringey (95% confidence level)

  10. Contact in last 12 months Contact with Newlon in last 12 months - Q1-3 Reason for contact - Q1-3 Q3: 62% GN: 63% Leaseholders / shared owners: 68% IR: 77% Q3: 74% GN: 81% Leaseholders / shared owners: 66% IR: 84% Base: Q1-3 (757): GN (515), Leaseholders / shared owners (163), IR (79) Base: Q1-3 (497): GN (326), Leaseholders / shared owners (110), IR (61)

  11. Customer satisfaction with query handling Base: Q1-3 (497)

  12. What drives service satisfaction? Source: STAR benchmarking service: Analysis of findings 2012/13, HouseMark March 2014

  13. Responsive Repairs Survey

  14. Rating of different aspects of the repair service Satisfaction by wave Base: Q1-3 (602) Significantly different to Q3 (95% confidence level)

  15. Appointment making and keeping Appointment convenient – Q1-3 Appointment kept – Q1-3 2013 STAR: 79% Q3: 83% Q3: 85% Base: Q1-3 (602): Breyer (289), BSW (138), R W Porter (69), Others (106) Significantly different to RW Porter (95% confidence level)

  16. Repair completed ‘right first time’? Repair completed ‘right first time’ – Q1-3 Q3: 70% Base: Q1-3 (602): Breyer (289), BSW (138), R W Porter (69), Others (106) Significantly different to RW Porter (95% confidence level)

  17. Conclusions

  18. Conclusions • Key results for the Customer Satisfaction survey have remained in line with Q2, with scores remaining below what we have seen from other London organisations • There are significant differences in satisfaction by ward, with Haringey significantly outperforming the other wards where we can make a comparison (Tower Hamlets, Hackney, Islington) • However, Repairs scores have improved from Q1, which indicates an upward trend in performance over time (especially when the results of the 2013 STAR survey are taken into account) • Although they do not receive a repairs service, most contact from leaseholders and shared owners relates to repairs • There may be scope in future waves to look at what repairs leaseholders/shared owners are enquiring about • Given the strong relationship between repairs and overall service satisfaction, we would expect the gains made in repairs to lead to increases in overall service satisfaction over time • There may also be scope in future waves to look at the views of those who are still waiting to have a repair done

More Related