1 / 19

INNOVATION AND PSD ISSUES IN THE EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA REGION

INNOVATION AND PSD ISSUES IN THE EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA REGION. Alfred Watkins (37277) Lead PSD Specialist ECSPF. CHALLENGE. Convert knowledge to wealth

keon
Télécharger la présentation

INNOVATION AND PSD ISSUES IN THE EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA REGION

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. INNOVATION AND PSD ISSUES IN THE EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA REGION Alfred Watkins (37277) Lead PSD Specialist ECSPF

  2. CHALLENGE • Convert knowledge to wealth • Generally speaking, ECA countries have well educated populations, even at the tertiary education level, but lack the organizational and industrial capacity to utilize this resource

  3. Competitiveness Challenges • Commercialize R&D – convert knowledge into wealth • Upgrade technology to enhance economic competitiveness and productivity in non-high tech sectors • Potential danger: generation of high tech enclaves with few beneficial spillovers to rest of economy

  4. Competitiveness Challenges Lead To Policy Dilemmas • R&D vs. Technology Upgrading • High tech vs. Traditional Sectors • SMEs vs. Large enterprises • Scientists and Engineers vs. Everything Else • Numerical Targets vs. Structural Reforms

  5. R&D Design & Engineering Acquisition Use R&D Vs. Technology Upgrading

  6. R&D Vs. Technology Upgrading Policy makers emphasize R&D and ignore other layers of the technology pyramid …. • but most firms in candidate countries and FSU do not perform R&D, finance R&D, or use R&D conducted elsewhere • their technology is obsolete and low productivity reduces their competitiveness

  7. Technology Upgrading Capability • To upgrade technology, firms need to be aware of their technological challenges and options and able to implement the needed solutions • Do local enterprises have the managerial, technical and organizational capacity to find, modify, absorb and utilize innovations? • If not, can public and private policies help to remove these deficiencies?

  8. In what group are local firms?

  9. To generate prosperity, should economic policy focus on high tech or traditional sectors?

  10. Isolated SMEs vs. Clusters • Dynamic SMEs must be embedded in regional, national or global value chains with dynamic clients, customers and suppliers • links to large and small, local and foreign firms generate dynamic firms • Otherwise, SMEs are in a survival mode • Living dead, subsistence firms rather than engines for growth and competitiveness

  11. Scientists Vs. Other Things:Porter and Stern Rankings

  12. Scientists vs. other things • Most transition countries rank relatively high on scientists and engineers and relatively low on the other variables • Problem is relative inability to utilize knowledge – deficit of social and organizational capital; not human capital • Czech and Hungary rank highest among transition countries and are notable exceptions to this generalization

  13. Numerical Targets vs. Structural Reform • In competitive economies, government, R&D/education, and enterprise sectors work to reinforce each other • the triple helix • Transition economies have a triple silos

  14. INSTITUTIONAL CONTEXT Policy Incentive System, Financial and Funding System, Legal Framework, Organizational Structures OTHER KNOWLEDGE SOURCES CUSTOMERS INDUSTRY Large TNC Start-ups SME Large Domestic Research Institutes Research Institutes Export Research Institutes Domestic Foreign Technology Sources Knowledge Linkage Transfer and Development Organizations Research Institutes The Industrial Technology Development System: A Schematic Framework

  15. Slowly Changing Historical Legacy • Networking, trusting communication links vs. KGB • Locational proximity vs. Stalinist planning based on separation, control, and isolation • Old supply chains disappeared with Comecon – how to insert into global supply chains • States as laboratories of democracy (Brandeis) vs. penchant for central authority

  16. Issues for Future Research • Role of FDI, spillovers, and technology upgrading • Skill development centers – Penang as cooperative model? Krasnoyarsk? • How to find high value added, high wage, high skill niches in global division of labor • Clusters, links to demanding customers, creation of suppliers with quality control and technical skills • How to upgrade skill intensity of local enterprises

  17. Russia S&T Project -- Issues • Expensive foreign patenting • Isolation from global markets • Sale of prototypes • Lack of finance • Limited commercialization structures • Don’t know how to proceed and how to learn from international lessons of experience

  18. Potential World Bank Project • Matching grant programs – (i) cost of foreign patenting; (ii) joint R&D/contract research programs; (iii) SBIR; (iv) partnership visits; (v) others • Pilot technology commercialization centers – (i) technology audits; (ii) TTOs; (iii) incubators; (iv) marketing; (v) commercialization strategy; (vi) coaching and training

More Related