1 / 50

Crane Bridge Design

Crane Bridge Design. Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. Matt Albert AJ Chandler Noah Fehrenbacher Jake Gennicks Jake Wilhoit. STJ Engineering. Project Description Design Requirements Preliminary Design Decision Matrix Final Design Summary. Presentation Overview.

kimi
Télécharger la présentation

Crane Bridge Design

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Crane Bridge Design Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Matt Albert AJ Chandler Noah Fehrenbacher Jake Gennicks Jake Wilhoit STJ Engineering

  2. Project Description Design Requirements Preliminary Design Decision Matrix Final Design Summary Presentation Overview

  3. Naval Surface Warfare Center Crane Division • Located in Martin County, Indiana • Constructed during WWII • Purpose of base: • Weapons development • Ammunition storage • Ammunition distribution

  4. Design Requirements • Environmental permitting • Traffic control plan • Topographic map • Geotechnical subsurface investigation • Hydraulic analysis • Complete bridge design

  5. Environmental Permitting • United States Army Corps of Engineers • Letter of Permission • Indiana Department of Environmental Management • Regional General Permit • Demolition Notification • Indiana Department of Natural Resources, Division of Water • No permit required

  6. Codes and Regulations • Indiana Department of Transportation Codes • American Association of State Highway Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Load and Resistance Factor Design • Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices • Environmental Permits

  7. Bridge 1926 Current Condition • Constructed in 1941 • Deck rehabilitated in 1956 • Timber foundation and superstructure • Four spans totaling 80 feet • Two lane highway

  8. Traffic Control Bridge

  9. Topographic Map

  10. Soil Borings

  11. Hydrology Study Drainage Area = 1.1 mi2 85% Point Q100 = 932 cfs 10% Point Slope = 54.2 ft/mi Bridge Q100 = 181*DA0.799*Sl0.466*(I-2.5)0.831

  12. Hydraulic Analysis Existing road surface @ 95.5’ Bottom existing beams @ 93.3’ 100 year peak flood level @ 85.5’ Creek bed @ 82’

  13. Decision Matrix Design Options

  14. Decision Matrix Design Criteria

  15. Decision Matrix

  16. Decision Matrix

  17. Decision Matrix

  18. Decision Matrix

  19. Decision Matrix

  20. Structural Design Deck Design Beam Design 8 in Thickness Wind Load Live Load Dead Load 387 lbs 387 lbs 16 kips 16 kips 3 kips 100 lbs/ft 640 lbs/ft 33 ft

  21. Beam Design Dead Load Live Load 1183 lbs/ft 640 lbs/ft 8 kips 32 kips 32 kips

  22. Beam Design Foundation Design Design 80 ft 45 in

  23. Foundation Design 75 k 75 k 75 k 75 k 75 k Load from Beams H-Piles Design 33 ft 36 in 20 ft Bedrock

  24. Cost Estimate for Construction GRAND TOTAL $128,700

  25. Cost Estimate for Construction GRAND TOTAL $128,700

  26. Cost Estimate for Construction GRAND TOTAL $128,700

  27. Cost Estimate for Construction GRAND TOTAL $128,700

  28. Bridge 3175 Current Condition • Located on south perimeter • Steel superstructure with concrete deck • Limestone block abutments • Single lane security road • Single span of 24 feet

  29. Topographic Map

  30. Topographic Map Soil Borings

  31. Hydrology Study Q100 = 2530 cfs Bridge Q100 = 181*DA0.799*Sl0.466*(I-2.5)0.831

  32. Hydraulic Analysis 100 year peak flood level @ 103.75’ Existing road surface @ 103.5’ Bottom existing beams @ 101.5’ Creek bed @ 91’

  33. Decision Matrix Design Options

  34. Decision Matrix Design Criteria

  35. Decision Matrix

  36. Decision Matrix

  37. Decision Matrix

  38. Decision Matrix

  39. Decision Matrix

  40. Culvert Design Backfill Design Foundation Design 8 ft x 2 24 ft 10 ft 10 ft 2 ft 8 ft x 2 8 ft 675 Cubic Yards

  41. Cost Estimate for Construction GRAND TOTAL $62,500

  42. Cost Estimate for Construction GRAND TOTAL $62,500

  43. Cost Estimate for Construction GRAND TOTAL $62,500

  44. Cost Estimate for Construction GRAND TOTAL $62,500

  45. Summary • Project Description • Design Requirements • Preliminary Design • Decision Matrix • Final Design Process • Cost Estimate

  46. Any Questions?

More Related