1 / 18

ALMA Observations of Keplerian Disks around Protostars: the case of L1527

NMA. SMA. NMA. ALMA Observations of Keplerian Disks around Protostars: the case of L1527. Nagayoshi Ohashi (NAOJ). With K. Saigo, Y. Aso, S.-W. Yen, S. Takakuwa, S. Koyamatsu, Y. Aikawa, K. Tomisaka, K. Tomita, M. Machida, M. Saito. ALMA. ?. Summary.

kina
Télécharger la présentation

ALMA Observations of Keplerian Disks around Protostars: the case of L1527

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. NMA SMA NMA ALMA Observations of Keplerian Disks around Protostars: the case of L1527 Nagayoshi Ohashi (NAOJ) With K. Saigo, Y. Aso, S.-W. Yen, S. Takakuwa, S. Koyamatsu, Y. Aikawa, K. Tomisaka, K. Tomita, M. Machida, M. Saito ALMA ?

  2. Summary • In order to unambiguously identify Keplerian disks around protostars, it is crucial to distinguish between Kepler rotation (VrotµR-0.5) and rotation conserving angular momentum(VrotµR-1). • ALMA cycle 0 observations of L1527 IRS shows that • Most of C18O 2-1 emission arises from an infalling envelope. • The C18O arising the vicinity of the central star (R < 60 AU) may suggests a Keplerian disk. • SO 65-54 shows rigid-like rotation at lower velocities (DV = -1 — 1 km/s) • The kinematics of the SO emission seems to be not explained with the same kinematics explaining the C18O emission.

  3. Keplerian disks are ubiquitous around PMSs • Keperian disks are formed as by-products of star formation. • It is, however, not well understood when and how disks are formed. • Initial condition of Keprian disks • Dynamical mass of protostars Simon, Dutrey, Guilloteau 2000

  4. Formation of Keplerian disks around protostars: A conventional picture Dynamical Infall region Vinfall> Vrotation NMA Obs Keplerian rotation region Vinfall<< Vrotation Note that B-field could remove angular momentum effectively, preventing disk formation (e.g., Mellon & Li 2008, 2009; Machida et al. 2011, Dapp et al. 2012) c. f. Terebey et al. 1984; Basu 1998

  5. Previous studies to identify (Keplerian) disks around protostars (The list is NOT complete) • Arce and Sargent 2006 • Brinchet al. 2007 • Lommen et al. 2008 • Jorgensen et al. 2009 • Lee et al. 2009, 2010 • Maury et al. 2010 • Tanner and Arce 2011 • Tobin et al. 2011, 2012 It has been difficult to firmly Identify Keplerian disks around protostars. If I miss your papers please kindly let me know!

  6. SMA CS 7-6 Total Intensity NMA C18O 1-0 SMA CS7-6 mean velocity Inner regions of the infalling envelope around L1551 IRS5 Takakauwa, Ohashi + 2004

  7. NMA C18O (1-0) (Momose et al. 1998) SMA CS7-6 mean velocity Infall  Rotation SMA CS 7-6 Infalling motions are dominant on large scales, while rotating motions are dominant on small scales Takakauwa, Ohashi + 2004

  8. Are Kepler motions identified around L1551 IRS5? • Sign of spin-up motion consistent with Kepler motion. • R-1 dependence cannot be ruled out. PV diagram of the SMA CS 7-6 data R-1 and R-0.5 dependences have to be carefully distinguished. Takakuwa et al. 2004

  9. L1527 IRS (IRAS 04368+2557) Spitzer IRAC Tobin et al. (2008) • Class0/I protostar • Lbol ~ 1.9 Lsolar ,Tbol ~ 56 K • Wide opening outflow (Tamura et al. 1996) • Infalling envelope of 1000 AU scale (Ohashi et al. 1997) • Inclination~85°

  10. NMA C18O 1-0 Infalling Envelope • Elongated envelope perpendicular to the outflow (Ohashi et al 1997). • 2000 AU in radius • Dynamical infall • Vinfall ~ 0.3 km/s • Vrotation ~0.05 km/s • dM/dt ~ 1x10-6 Mo/yr

  11. CARMA 13CO 2-1: Keplerian Disk? How to distinguish R-1 and R-0.5 dependences? NMA C18O 1-0 VrotµR-1 CARMA 13CO 2-1 VrotµR-0.5 Tobin et al. 2012 Nature

  12. Rotation Curve with a logarithmic scale(Yen et al. 2013) R > 500 AU: Gaussian fit to the spectrum at a given position R < 500 AU：Gaussian fit to the intensity profile at each channel rotation curve with a logarithmic scale Position (arcsec) Velocity (km s–1)

  13. C18O 2-1 with SMA Vekicity (km s–1) Position (arcsec) (Yen et al. 2013)

  14. SMA C18O 2-1 Rotation Curve Velocity (km s–1) Radius (AU) Yen et al. 2013

  15. ALMA Cycle 0 Observations • In order to investigate kinematics of circumstellar material in detail (particularly rotation), three protostars, including L1527 IRS, have been observed with ALMA cycle 0. • 12CO, C18O 2-1, SO 65-54, 220 GHz continuum etc • Dq ~ 0.96” x 0.73” (PA ~ 11 deg) • DV ~ 0.17 km/s • L1527 IRS, TMC1A (Aso’s talk), L1489 IRS c. f. Sakai et al. have observed L1527 IRS in C3H2, SO, etc. with ALMA cycle 0 as well (submitted)

  16. ALMA can identify a compact rotating component around class 0 protostar! SMA DV = –2.5 km/s DV = 2.5 km/s 140 AU 280 AU

  17. Rotation Curve 5 N Rotation Velocity (km s–1) Rb ~ 54 ± 0.44 AU pin~ –0.41 ± 0.24 Pout ~ -1.16 ± 0.13 M* ~0.33 Mo 1 0.5 50 100 Rotation Radius (AU) S Rotation Radius (AU)

  18. Summary • In order to unambiguously identify Keplerian disks around protostars, it is crucial to distinguish between Kepler rotation (VrotµR-0.5) and rotation conserving angular momentum(VrotµR-1). • ALMA cycle 0 observations of L1527 IRS shows that • Most of C18O 2-1 emission arises from an infalling envelope. • The C18O arising the vicinity of the central star (R < 60 AU) may suggests a Keplerian disk. • SO 65-54 shows rigid-like rotation at lower velocities (DV = -1 — 1 km/s) • The kinematics of the SO emission seems to be not explained with the same kinematics explaining the C18O emission.

More Related