1 / 20

Opportunities of Sustainable Bioenergy – Lessons learnt from two recent Workshops

Opportunities of Sustainable Bioenergy – Lessons learnt from two recent Workshops. Rainer Janssen , Dominik Rutz , Cosette Khawaja WIP – Renewable Energies Ensuring Access to Sustainable Bioenergy Globally GBEP/PANGEA Workshop, EUSEW 2013 European Parliament Brussels, 24 June 2013.

kineta
Télécharger la présentation

Opportunities of Sustainable Bioenergy – Lessons learnt from two recent Workshops

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Opportunities of Sustainable Bioenergy – Lessons learnt from two recent Workshops Rainer Janssen , DominikRutz, CosetteKhawaja WIP – Renewable Energies Ensuring Access toSustainableBioenergyGloballyGBEP/PANGEA Workshop, EUSEW 2013 European Parliament Brussels, 24 June 2013

  2. Workshop on Sustainable Biomass Production in Southeast Africa • 19-21 March 2013, Maputo, Mozambique • Inviting organisation: NL Agency, The Netherlands • In cooperation with • Ministry of Energy (DNER), MZ • Ministry of Agriculture (CEPAGRI), MZ • Event organisation: WIP Renewable Energies, Germany • Workshop documentation:http://www.b2match.eu/biomass-workshop-2013-maputo

  3. Case study: Policy Development in MZ • May 2009: Publication of National Biofuels Policy and Strategy • July 2011: Establishment of Inter-ministerial Committee on Biofuels (CIB) • November 2011: Approval of Biofuel Regulation (production, storage, distribution and sales, biofuel blends (E10, B3)) • Awaiting CIB Approval: National Biofuel Standards • Finalisation of Adoption: National Biofuel Sustainability Framework (principles, criteria, indicators) • Since 2008: Programme ‘Promoting sustainable and poverty-reducing investments in biofuel production’ (CEPAGRI, NL Government)

  4. Between 2008 – 2012, CEPAGRI analysed 117 investment proposals (40 biofuel projects) • In 2012, only 4 proposals requested 54,000 ha for biofuel production • Investment approval subject to Biofuel Sustainability Framework • Initial investors (Jatropha) have withdrawn • Focus on experienced companies(oil or ethanol sector) with long-term committment Ref.: H. Neves, CEPAGRI

  5. Soap production and Multi-funtional Platform, Cabo Delgado Social activities, food security Ref.: H. Neves, CEPAGRI

  6. Case study: Biogas from Wastes, ZA • Large biogas potential in South Africa from wastes and residues • Since 2007, Bio2Watt Ltd. is developing a biogas project in Bronkhorstspruit, ZA • Utilisation of 20,000 t of wet waste from cattle and chicken farms (3 MW electricity production) • Long permit, license, agreement processes (EIA, land lease, waste management and water use license, PPA, grid connection/transmission) • Long-term commitment and financing required • Lobby group: Southern African Biogas Industrial Association (SABIA)

  7. Case study: Biogas Development in ZA Ref.: R. Melamu, University of Cape Town

  8. Case study: Ethanol Production in Malawi • First ethanol production plant and E20 introduced in 1982 as response to fuel crisis • Two plants owned and operated by Malawians • ETHCO (since 1982), 60,000 l/d • PressCane (since 2004), 60,000 l/d • Annual capacity: 36 million litres • Production volumes: 18 million litres (feedstock shortage) • B20 demand: 22 million litres • Government support for expansion and FFV introduction ETHCO PRESSCANE

  9. Case study: Ethanol Production in Malawi ETHCO production plant • Ethanol production since 1982 • Uses C molasses from (adjacent) DwangwaSugar mill • Products • fuel alcohol • industrial alcohol • beverage (potable) alcohol • Staff: 100 Ref.: L. Chakaniza, ETHCO, Malawi

  10. WS Conclusions: Bioenergy Policy Development • Realistic, stable and long-term policiesto provide reliable business framework conditions for investors • Policy development in close collaboration with all stakeholders • Policies based on solid research base • Focus on solid biomass (e.g. firewood, charcoal) as well as other modern forms of bioenergy in an integrated manner • Clear Implementation Plans and Action Plans • Incentivesand support schemes, enabling infrastructure • Combined food and bioenergy production • Nexus between bioenergy production and poverty eradication

  11. WS Conclusions: Ensuring Sustainability • Bioenergy sustainability schemes for African countries need to be based on African reality and existing legislation • Reliable and clear sustainability schemes to create an enabling business environment for investors • Indicators developed by the Global Bioenergy Partnership (GBEP) can serve to develop successful bioenergy projects • Address all forms of bioenergy, including solid biomass • Bioenergy sustainability schemes adapted and simplyfied for application by smallholder farmers

  12. Policy Forum “Opportunities for Sustainable Bioenergy Development: National Experiences and Global Exchange” • 28 May 2013, Berlin, Germany • Pre-Meeting to GBEP Events, 29-31 May 2013 • Organised by: • German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) • Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) • In cooperation with • Global Bioenergy Partnership (GBEP) • Forum documentation:http://www.globalbioenergy.org/events1/gbep-events-2013/other-events-2013/en/

  13. Case study: Agroforestry in India IFAD & ICRAF Programme to improve food security through biofuel development • Development of suitable agroforestry systems – use of marginal land • Combinations of crops for sustainable production throughout the year  based on agroclimatic conditions / ecosystems • Value chain approach: Landscape / System Approach • Agroforestry challenges: • Selection of appropriate species (ecosystem based) • Quality planting material • Short rotation crops • Remuneration to small farmers Ref.: N. Sharma, ICRAF

  14. Programme application in Karnataka, India • Inclusion of multiple & locally adapted species • Pongamia(Pongamiapinnata) • Madhuka (Madhukalatifolia), • Neem(Azadirachtaindica) • Simarouba(Simaroubaglauca), • Jatropha(Jatrophacurcus) • Amoora(Amoorarohiyuka) & • Surahonne(Calophylluminophyllum L) • Smart farming systems (e.g. fence planting) • Area covered: 7,000 ha; • No of seedlings:1.5 millions • South-South cooperation with Brazil (EMBRAPA), Sri Lanka Source: ICRAF

  15. Case study: Wood Energy Value Chains - Madagascar German Malagasy Environmental Programme (PGNE/GIZ) Ref.: P. Lopez, GIZ

  16. Results and Impacts • 7,050 ha degraded grassland savanna afforested and valorized • by 2,900 rural households • exploited legally, sustainable and with improved kiln technic by 620 charcoal producers • results in 800 ha exploitable plantation/year, for domestic energy needs of 30.000 (urban) persons • Poverty reduction in rural areas: additional income of EUR 85/year for 3 ha (exploitable forest) Ref.: P. Lopez, GIZ

  17. Policy Forum – Conclusions 1 • No ”one size fits all”, successful projects need scale-up • Bottom-up approach for policy development (based on existing projects), clear objectives • Create local capacity in research and development • Create enabling environment for investments • Focus on full value chains, market solutions (e.g. clean cookstoves) • Focus on crops known by farmers and use of residues • Develop adapted technologies (transfer to smallholders) • Rural development by improving agricultural productivity and yield efficiency (e.g. agroforestry systems)

  18. Policy Forum – Conclusions 2 • Food security comes first • Bioenergy solutions need to be tailored to specific framework conditions • Sutainable bioenergy requires • Land use management and agricultural zoning (landscape approach) • Participatory involvement of stakeholders • GBEP sustainability indicators can serve as guidance

  19. THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR YOUR ATTENTION! Contact Rainer Janssen , DominikRutz, CosetteKhawaja WIP – Renewable Energies www.wip-munich.de rainer.janssen@wip-munich.de dominik.rutz@wip-munich.de cosette.khawaja@wip-munich.de http://www.springer.com/environment/sustainable+development/book/978-94-007-2180-7

More Related