1 / 21

Molecular simulation on radiation behavior of Li 2 O

Molecular simulation on radiation behavior of Li 2 O. Takuji Oda , Yasuhisa Oya, Satoru Tanaka Department of Quantum Engineering & Systems Science The University of Tokyo. Background. 6 Li + n → 4 He (2.1 MeV) + T (2.7 MeV).

kirby
Télécharger la présentation

Molecular simulation on radiation behavior of Li 2 O

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Molecular simulation on radiation behavior of Li2O Takuji Oda, Yasuhisa Oya, Satoru Tanaka Department of Quantum Engineering & Systems Science The University of Tokyo

  2. Background 6Li + n →4He (2.1 MeV) + T (2.7 MeV) To establish a secure and efficient fuel cycle in a fusion reactor, produced tritium must be recovered rapidly from the breeding blanket. In the case of a solid breeding material (Li2O, Li2TiO3 etc), radiation defects created in the severe radiation conditions affect the tritium behavior strongly. Hence, behaviors of tritium and defects in Li2O have been extensively studied. However, …. • The evaluated tritium diffusivities are scattered. • The concrete influence of each defect is not understood sufficiently. Our aim is to model the hydrogen isotope behavior precisely, based on the atomic-scale understandings on the radiation effect.

  3. Subjects (1) Radiation behavior (MD simulation) (2) Interaction with Li vac. (FT-IR exp. & DFT calculation) surf. (3) Interaction with F centers (DFT calculation) (4) Influence of the dynamic Frenkel defects (MD simulation) bulk n T- (1) (3) O F Li VLi (4) T+ T+ Li+ VLi (2) (LiOT)n Fig. 1. Tritium in Li2O

  4. Experimental ; FT-IR with an ion gun Sample：Li2O s.c. φ10mm, 1mm Fig.2. IR absorption experimental system OD stretching vibrations showsmultiple peaks by interaction with a specific defect. The behaviors of hydrogen isotopes in various chemical states can be analyzed individually.

  5. O : Li : Calculation details-1; plane-wave pseudopotential DFT Software: CASTEP code Functional: PBE K-point grid: 3x3x3 Energy cutoff: 380 eV Calculation cost was reduced by use of plane-wave basis and pseudopotential technique (O 1s). 2x2x2 Conventional cell (Li8O4) 2x2x2 supercell (Li64O32)

  6. Calculation details-2; classical molecular dynamics (MD) In the classical MD, electrons are not described explicitly. As a result, the calculation cost is enough reduced to perform the dynamics simulation. < Buckingham pair potential model> q1q2/r+A×exp(-r/ρ) - C/r6 Fig. 2. Inter-ionic potential (Li-O) (i) Coulombic interaction (ii)Short range interaction(10 Å cutoff) Software: DL-POLY System: 5x5x5 or 7x7x7 supercell (Li1000O500 or Li2744O1372) Ensemble: NpT or NEV Time step: 1 fs or variable step Simulation time: ~5 ns or ~4 ps In the case of radiation simulation, the Buckingham potential was connected to the ZBL potential by polynomial at around 0.6-1 Å.

  7. Subjects (1) Radiation behavior (MD simulation) (2) Interaction with Li vac. (FT-IR exp. & DFT calculation) surf. (3) Interaction with F centers (DFT calculation) (4) Influence of the dynamic Frenkel defects (MD simulation) bulk n T- (1) (3) O F Li VLi (4) T+ T+ Li+ VLi (2) (LiOT)n Fig. 1. Tritium in Li2O

  8. (2) Interaction with Li vac.; FT-IR during 3keV D2+ irradiation Fig.3. O-D peaks during 3keV D2+ irradiation Fig.4. Intensity variation of each peak O-D is stabilized in the bulk by interaction with a defect (2605 cm-1) or by mutual aggregation (LiOD phase: 2710 cm-1) • 2710 cm-1 is LiOD phase. • 2660 cm-1 is mainly the surface O-D. • 2605 cm-1 is not attributed.. • [Low fluence] Only the surface O-D. • [High] The LiOD phase becomes dominant. What is the “defect” ??

  9. (2) Interaction with Li vac. ; FT-IR during heating after the D2+ irr. decrease increase Fig.5. Variation in O-D peaks during heating By the heating, the 2605 cm-1 peak decreased, while the 2710 cm-1 peak increased. O-D aggregated each other: (LiO- -D + )n [2605 cm-1] → LiOD phase [2710 cm-1] By the aggregation, (LiO- -D + ) can be really stabilized ??

  10. Li : O : H : (2) Interaction with Li vac. ; stabilization by aggregation (DFT) A: 1 isolated (LiO- - H+) C: (LiO- - H+)2 Fig.6. Electronic density B: 2 isolated (LiO- - H+) Stabilization by aggregation is confirmed !

  11. (3) Interaction with F centers ; locally stable positions near F centers (DFT) <O-H site> Li: , O: , H: , F centers: <O defect site> Fig. 7. H+ neighboring F center in Li2O *By controlling the system charge, O vac., F+, and F0 are modeled.

  12. (3) Interaction with F centers ; stability around F centers (DFT) <O-H site> <O defect site> Fig. 8. Stability of H near F center F centers trap H strongly, and reduce it to H-.

  13. (4) Influence of the dynamic Frenkel defect; what is “the superionics” in Li2O ? (MD) 2600 K (liquid) 1600 K (superionics) 1000 K (solid) Vacant site O Li O Li Fig. 10. Li2O crystal Fig. 9. Projected ionic densities on (100) plane • Just Li behaves like liquid even below the melting point >> the superionics. • Most Li migrates along [100] (~90%), assisted by the dynamic Frenkel defects.

  14. (4) Influence of the dynamic Frenkel defect; what is “the dynamic Frenkel defect” ? (MD) (a) Extrinsic region(by a Li vacancy) >>0.25 eV (b) Below the critical temp. (by the dynamic defect) >> 1.9 eV (c) Above the critical temp. >> 0.62 eV (d) Liquid state >> 0.40 eV f: correlation factor >> ~ 0.653 in theory d: distance in a jump >> ~0.25 nm along <100> [Freq.]: vibration frequency >> ~ 3x1013 s-1 from MD Ed: diffusion barrier Ndefect / Natom: defect density Fig. 11. Variation of Li diffusion coefficients

  15. (4) Influence of the dynamic Frenkel defect; the dynamic defect, a defect cluster, etc (MD) Fig. 12. Contribution of the dynamic Frenkel defect to Li diffusivities • Even in the highly Li-burnup conditions, the contribution of the dynamic Frenkel defect in the Li diffusivity reaches 50 % above 1200 K. The participation of the dynamic defect is significant above 1200 K. The dynamic defects may also affect T+ behavior, due to the similarity.

  16. (1) Radiation behavior of Li2O; 102.9 eV Li PKA along <110> (MD) Movie 1. Li PKA along [110] (PKA energy: 102.9 eV, NEV with 0K initial temp.)

  17. (1) Radiation behavior of Li2O; threshold displacement energy (MD) Angle dependence of the threshold displacement energy was obtained: angular resolution of 6x6=36 for each under NEV ensemble (0 K initial temp.) ( 0 eV 80 eV ) Vacant O [505] [555] Li [550] [500] O displacement Li displacement (left: vac., right: O) Fig. 14. Threshold displacement energies Fig. 13. Li2O crystal • O requires much more high energy for displacement than Li. • The threshold energy can be ordered as [111] ＞ [110] ＞ [100].

  18. (1) Radiation behavior of Li2O; key points for the modeling (MD) Fig. 15. Number of Li vac. survived after 4 ps Fig. 16. Variation of the maximum energy • The PKA energy is immediately spread into the system. • Number of stable defects are sensitively dependent on the PKA energy. (due to the self-annealing effect, etc) This behavior could be related to the self-annealing effect, the radiation induced diffusion, etc. The threshold energy is not enough to describe the radiation event.

  19. Summary surf. (1) Radiation behavior (MD simulation) (3) Interaction with F centers (DFT calculation) bulk • F centers trap T+ strongly and reduce it to T-. • O requires much higher energy for displacement than Li. n T- • The threshold energy: [111] ＞ [110] ＞ [100]. (1) (3) O • Capturing force depends on the charge state of F centers: F0 > F+ > O vac. F Li • The PKA energy is rapidly spread into the system. VLi (4) Influence of the dynamic Frenkel defects (MD simulation) (2) Interaction with Li vac. (FT-IR exp. & DFT calculation) (4) T+ T+ Li+ VLi (2) • The dynamic defect assists Li diffusion strongly, over 1200 K.. • Li vac. heightens the stability of T+ (formation of subs. T+). (LiOT)n • The dynamic defect may also affect T+ behavior. • (LiO- - T+) becomes more stable by aggregation. Fig. 1. Tritium in Li2O

  20. Future works (1) Radiation behavior • How about electron excitation >> ?? • How about model dependences >> checking by other models (2) Interaction with Li vac. • How to aggregate each other >> classical MD >> modeling “T+ in Li2O” (3) Interaction with F centers • How to detrap >> ab-initio MD >> FT-IR & UV absorption experiment (4) The dynamic Frenkel defect • How to interact with T+>> classical MD >> modeling “T+ in Li2O”

  21. Acknowledgements We are very grateful to Dr. R. Devanathan, Dr. F. Gao, Dr. W.J. Weber and Dr. L.R. Corrales for help and support during the present research. This research was performed in part using the MSCF in EMSL, a national scientific user facility sponsored by the U.S. DOE, OBER and located at PNNL. • the 21st Century COE Program, “Mechanical Systems Innovation,” by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology • the Tokyo Denryoku Zaidan • the Atomic Energy Society of Japan We are also grateful to for financial support on the present research.

More Related