1 / 20

2000-2006 AMANDA-II Point Source Search Results

2000-2006 AMANDA-II Point Source Search Results. Jim Braun IceCube Spring 2008 Collaboration Meeting. 2000. 2001. 2002. 2003. 2004. 2005. 2006. m -DAQ Point Source Searches. AMANDA-II complete. Hauschildt, Steele: Phys.Rev.Lett.92:071102 2004. This Analysis

koen
Télécharger la présentation

2000-2006 AMANDA-II Point Source Search Results

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 2000-2006 AMANDA-II Point Source Search Results Jim Braun IceCube Spring 2008 Collaboration Meeting

  2. 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 m-DAQ Point Source Searches AMANDA-II complete Hauschildt, Steele: Phys.Rev.Lett.92:071102 2004 This Analysis Combine all years for best possible sensitivity Final sample will also be utilized by John K. and others Y.-R. Wang: Phys.Rev.D71:077102 2005 M. Ackermann: Phys.Rev.D75:102001 2007 Unblinded in 2007 by J. Braun Unblinded in 2007 by J. Braun m-DAQ decommissioned

  3. Data Overview 2000-2004 unified filtering done in Zeuthen by Ackermann et al. 2005-2006 filtered in Madison with a very similar configuration. • Data and neutrino simulation available in Madison

  4. Event Selection • 20M events at L3 • Use cuts from 5 year analysis • Smoothness • Paraboloid error • Up/down likelihood ratio • Use an SVM-based cut for d < 1.5o • 6595 total events • Much more information available on analysis web page: http://www.icecube.wisc.edu/~jbraun/combined_point_source

  5. Event Selection

  6. Search Method • Apply unbinned maximum likelihood search method • Use paraboloid error estimate as a measure of reconstruction uncertainty • Use event energy (Nch) to separate signal from atmospheric neutrinos • Method details described in internal report: http://internal.icecube.wisc.edu/reports/data/icecube/2008/04/001/icecube_200804001_v2.pdf

  7. Search Method

  8. Sensitivity

  9. Unblinded Skymap Short, short summary: We see nothing

  10. Analysis What did we do with the data? 1. All-sky search 2. Search based on a list of candidates 3. Milagro stacking search 4. Search for autocorrelation

  11. 3yr max significance: 3.73s 1.5s Max Significance d=54o, a=11.4h 3.38s Significance All-Sky Search 5yr max significance: 3.74s 2.8s 95 of 100 data sets randomized in RA have a significance ³ 3.38s

  12. Source List Search Selected Sources The Crab: • Significance decreases • Still a minor upward fluctuation • Upward Fluctuations: • LS I +61 303 • Geminga • Downward Fluctuations: • Mrk 421 The probability of obtaining p £ 0.0086 for at least one of the 26 sources is 20%

  13. Experimental Limits Energy Range (90%): 1 TeV – 3 PeV

  14. Milagro Stacking Search A. Abdo et al. Proc. First Glast Symposium • Apply stacking search to 6 Milagro sources with >5s pretrial significance • Exclude PWN sources (Crab, Geminga) • Use method developed by HiRes* to perform our likelihood search simultaneously for all Milagro source locations • Improves per-source flux sensitivity and discovery potential by a factor of 4 compared to a fixed-point search for any of the six sources * R.U. Abbasi, et al. Astrophys. J., 636 680 (2006)

  15. Milagro Stacking Search Halzen, Kappes, O’Murchada [arXiv:0803.0314]

  16. Potential IC40 Sensitivity Milagro Stacking Search Halzen, Kappes, O’Murchada [arXiv:0803.0314]

  17. Significance Autocorrelation Search • Search for event clustering at angular scales comparable to detector resolution • Signal scenario: A number of small event clusters • Method: Count the number of event pairs given a maximum angular separation and minimum Nch and compare to distributions from data with randomized RA • Max significance: 1.6s • 99 out of 100 sets of randomized data have a max significance of 1.6s or greater

  18. Systematics • Systematics will be similar to those from the 5 year analysis • ANIS predicts 8% fewer atmospheric neutrino events compared to NUSIM • Include nt muon contribution? • Systematics of unbinned analysis

  19. Publication • Rapidly address systematics and get manuscript to collaboration as soon as possible

  20. Conclusions • This analysis is a factor of 2 more sensitive than previous point source analysis • We didn’t see anything • IC22, IC40 will yield substantial improvements

More Related