1 / 17

UNIACCESS Design of Universal Accessibility Systems for Public Transport SIXTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME PRIORITY 6.2: Sustain

UNIACCESS Design of Universal Accessibility Systems for Public Transport SIXTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME PRIORITY 6.2: Sustainable Surface Transport FP6-2003-Transport-3. What is UNIACCESS?. 2-year Coordinated Action to define concepts for universal accessibility in public transport funded by 6FP

koleyna
Télécharger la présentation

UNIACCESS Design of Universal Accessibility Systems for Public Transport SIXTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME PRIORITY 6.2: Sustain

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. UNIACCESS Design of Universal Accessibility Systems for Public Transport SIXTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME PRIORITY 6.2: Sustainable Surface Transport FP6-2003-Transport-3

  2. What is UNIACCESS? • 2-year Coordinated Action to define concepts for universal accessibility in public transport funded by 6FP • Goal:promote and support the networking coordination of research and innovation activities in the field of universal design of accessibility systems for public transport. • Partners: multi-sectoral (GIAT, ENIL, AGE, SINTEF, CRF, COCEMFE, STS, POLIS, RATP) • Group of experts

  3. Why Uniaccess? • Society’s commitment to equality of opportunity yet • Public transport far from being universally accessible due to: • No accessibility provisions • Discontinuity in accessibility provisions • Accessible devices out of order • Public attitudes (PT staff and passengers) to people with mobility difficulties • Inclusive design principles more developed in building sector than transport sector

  4. however • An accessible public transport system benefits all – the quality of a system is often a key factor in modal choice decisions • People with reduced mobility represent a hidden group of potential public transport users • More accessible transport can reduce the need for specialized transport means required by the elderly and disabled people

  5. Main activities of Uniaccess • To collect useful state-of-the-art knowledge for designing universal accessibility system for public transport. • To produce a roadmap of future R&D in universal design • To come up with new R&D project proposals allows us to bridge the technology gaps. • To define an improved collaborative innovation process • To raise awareness of universal design

  6. State of the art – Infrastructure • Retrofitting of older interchanges/ stations is expensive and full accessibility is difficult to achieve. • Furniture installed by service providers (cafes, shops, etc) is a major obstacle. • Verbal announcements are difficult to deliver due to multiplicity of noises & passenger complaints • Wide control gates encourage fraud. Control gates should offer a compromise between comfort for the users and fight against fraud • Illegal parking at bus stops is an obstacle to the deployment of accessible systems Zagreb Malmø

  7. State of the art – Vehicles • Life of certain vehicles very long (especially trains & trams) and retrofitting often costly and not comprehensive. • Despite technological improvements (e.g., kneeling cushions, ramps, etc), boarding and disembarking is still a challenge for people with reduced mobility due to steps/gaps. • Ramps take time to open/close and, in the case of manual ramps, require the drivers assistance which inconveniences both drivers and other passengers due to time lost. • ‘Aggressive’ driving (e.g., bus pulling away before everyone seated) can discourage people with reduce mobility from using public transport. • Wheelchair users take more place in vehicles than other users and their evacuation can take longer.

  8. State of the art – legislation & standards • Legislation on public transport accessibility in Europe varies widely in scope and structure. • Where legislation exists, it is not always adequately implemented due to lack of guidance, funding and enforcement. • Absence of public transport accessibility standards – industry is crying out for standards. • Legislation & standards alone will not deliver full accessibility. Policy and societal actions have role to play.

  9. State of the art – Society • Lack of societal awareness about needs of people with reduced mobility. • Poor public transport staff attitudes towards PRM passengers (drivers under pressure to meet schedules). • The growing proportion of people who cannot use conventional public transport constitutes a significant cost for society due to necessity to use private car or to provide specialised transport - taxis, community buses, etc.

  10. Roadmap for Future Research and Development State of the art Vision of the future Requirements Emerging concepts ROADMAP

  11. R&D roadmap – overview

  12. R&D roadmap – overview

  13. Recommendation based on best practices Review of existing national legislation EU-wide guidance for accessible design EU standards for accessible design Guidance for design Guidance for good practice Develop indicators “Transport for all” reference manual Europe-wide non-discrimination legislation Equal opportunities throughout Europe Legislation, standardization, policy and society Create European- Level agency Single information source for equality information Define criteria, process and delivery Laws in case of non-compliance Accessibility certification Define vehicle accessibility criteria Establish classification classes Vehicle classification scheme Define vehicle classification criteria Voluntary versus compulsory classifications Possibilities of bonus-malus scheme Demonstration programme for accessible transport system Mainstreaming universal accessibility Reduce illegal parking Rise awareness of drivers Driving Behavior Actions to promote accessible Transport/ human diversity Human diversity module for school curriculum Education Short term Medium term Long term R&D Roadmap overview

  14. Collaborative processes Our goal: Establish a closer link between stakeholders and define a new improved collaborative innovation process. How? • Examine current practice (how do designers, manufacturers, operators, authorities and end users currently interact). • Identify good practice • Prepare guidance for an enhanced ‘collaboration’

  15. R&D project proposals Our goal: Define new project proposals that carry out the intentions of the roadmap of future R&D in the frame of the improved collaborative process previously defined

  16. Dissemination & awareness raising • Quarterly newsletter • Workshop for local authorities: 20/21 March 06 • Key issues: communication & political support • Adopting universal accessibility principles in public transport design and delivery • Training manual • Training session, 8 November 2006, Brussels • UNIACCESS Conference: 9 November 2006, Brussels “Towards universal accessibility in public transport”

  17. For more information • Visit our Website http://www.uniaccessproject.org • Contact project coordinator: Sara Sillauren, Euve-Giat, email: sillaurrens@euve.org • Subscribe to our electronic newsletter on: http://www.uniaccessproject.org

More Related