1 / 1

Introduction:

The Discrepancy-Depression Association: Gender and Grade Differences Erin N. Stevens, M. C. Lovejoy, & Laura D. Pittman Northern Illinois University. Introduction:. Method: Measures. Simple Slopes Analyses:.

korene
Télécharger la présentation

Introduction:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Discrepancy-Depression Association: Gender and Grade DifferencesErin N. Stevens, M. C. Lovejoy, & Laura D. PittmanNorthern Illinois University Introduction: Method: Measures Simple Slopes Analyses: • Although boys and girls have similar levels of depression during childhood, rates of depression in girls surpass that in boys with the onset of adolescence (e.g., Nolen-Hoeksema & Girgus, 1994). • Self-discrepancy theory (SDT; Higgins, 1987) represents a framework for understanding how incompatible beliefs about the self induce different types of negative affect, including depressive symptoms. • Among adults, actual-ideal discrepancies are larger for depressed than nondepressed individuals (e.g., Fairbrother & Moretti, 1998; Higgins, Klein, & Strauman, 1985; Scott & O’Hara, 1993; Strauman, 1992; Strauman & Higgins, 1988). However, there is limited research examining the relation of self-discrepancy to depression in children and adolescents. • Developmental considerations: • SDT postulates that cognitive-developmental changes in early adolescence underlie the development of self-discrepancies (Higgins, 1989). • Gender differences in the strength of the association between self-discrepancy and depression may also emerge during adolescence, a time during which depression becomes more prevalent in girls than boys (Nolen-Hoeksema & Girgus, 1994). • The purpose of this study was to (1) examine the variance in depressive symptoms explained by self-discrepancies, beyond that which is accounted for by actual-self ratings (i.e., how positive individuals perceive themselves), and (2) test the developmental postulates of SDT. • Specifically, gender and age were examined as potential moderators in the relationship between actual:ideal discrepancies and depressive symptoms, after controlling for actual-self positivity, in a youth sample. We also examined the three-way interaction between discrepancies, gender, and age. • Child depression: Depressive symptoms were assessed using the short version of the CDI. The CDI short version is a 10-item paper-and-pencil questionnaire that provides a rapid assessment of depressive symptoms (α = .81; Kovacs, 1992). • Self-discrepancies: Discrepancies between actual and ideal selves were measured using an adaptation of the Selves Questionnaire that is traditionally used to measure self-discrepancy in adult samples (e.g., Higgins, 1987). • Ideal-self: participants generated five ‘ideal’ attributes and rated the degree to which they ideally would like to possess each attribute (7-point scale) • Actual-self: participants were provided with a list of their five ideal-self attributes and rated the degree to which they currently possess each • Actual:Ideal discrepancies were calculated by subtracting the score for each actual attribute from the score for the corresponding ideal attribute • Simple slopes analyses revealed that for both 5th and 8th graders, the relationship between discrepancies and depressive symptoms was significantly different from zero, β = .29, p < .01, and β = .60, p < .001 (see Figure 1). • The relationship between discrepancies and depressive symptoms differed as a function of gender, such that for girls, the relationship was significantly different from zero, β = .62, p < .001; for boys, however, the relationship was not significantly different from zero, β = .19, p = .11 (see Figure 2). Results: • Descriptive statistics were calculated (see Table 1), and a hierarchical regression was conducted to examine the moderating role of grade and gender in the relationship between actual:ideal discrepancies and depressive symptoms, after accounting for actual-self ratings(see Table 2). • However, the three-way interaction was non-significant(β = .31, p = .14). Conclusions: • This study allowed for a more fine-grained analysis of how the relationship between self-discrepancies and depressive symptoms changes over the course of development. • Importantly, while there was not a significant three-way interaction, it is likely that the observed pattern of results is primarily driven by the girls in our sample. • For the 5th and 8th grade boys, the relationship between actual:ideal discrepancies and depressive symptoms may be accounted for by actual-self ratings, or how positive they perceive themselves to be. • For girls, however, the findings point to a developmental pattern that suggests that actual:ideal discrepancies become more important to the prediction of depressive symptoms as the girls mature. • Overall the findings demonstrated a difference between males and females in the depression-cognition association that emerged sometime in mid-adolescence and could be related to the heightened risk for depression in girls, compared to boys in this age group. • While age is often a poor proxy for developmental level (Siegler, 1996), recent work suggests cognitive development may play an important role in the links between self-discrepancies and negative emotions (Stevens et al., 2013). • It may be that there is a necessary level of cognitive maturity needed in order for self-discrepancies to be related to depressive symptoms. Method: Participants and Procedure • Fifth and eighth grade students (N = 220) were recruited from Illinois and Iowa elementary and middle schools • Exclusions: improper administration of the measures (n = 16), incomplete data sets (i.e., not present for Time 2; n = 9), more than two excluded attributes (n = 3), • The final sample included 192 youth (5th grade n = 122; 8th grade n = 70). • Ethnicity: 72% percent of the children and adolescents were Caucasian, 15% were Hispanic or Latino, 5% were biracial, 3% were Black or African American, 1% percent were Asian, and 4% chose not to answer this item • 67% of the participants attended a public school; 33% attended a Catholic school • Participants completed questionnaires on two days: • At Time 1, participants completed the ideal-self measure. • Two weeks later, at Time 2, participants completed the actual-self measure and the Children’s Depression Inventory (CDI; Kovacs, 1992). • The order of the measures for Time 2 were counterbalanced. ∆ Correspondence concerning this poster should be addressed to: Erin N. Stevens, M.A., Department of Psychology, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL 60115 estevens@niu.edu

More Related