1 / 11

Meta-analysis

Meta-analysis. Dr Adam Tooley GPVTS ST2. Trials, systematic reviews and meta-analysis. “Does the new treatment confer significant benefits compared with conventional treatment?” Often several trials asking the same question.

kory
Télécharger la présentation

Meta-analysis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Meta-analysis Dr Adam Tooley GPVTS ST2

  2. Trials, systematic reviews and meta-analysis • “Does the new treatment confer significant benefits compared with conventional treatment?” • Often several trials asking the same question. • Often individual trials don’t show statistical clinical significance. • Combination of these results may reveal significant benefits of treatment. • E.g. Thrombolytic therapy for prevention of MI. • Meta-analysis now a hallmark of EBM. • Systematic reviews: • The heart of meta-analysis. • Find all published and unpublished research. • Present a balanced and impartial summary of existing research.

  3. Benefits of meta-analysis • Overcoming bias • Analysis carried out on a rigorous systematic review offers an unbiased review of data. • Precision • Analysis of combined results from many trials has more poweR to detect small but clinically significant effects • Transparency • Demonstrate all decisions made throughout the process.

  4. Conducting a meta-analysis • Location of studies: • Comprehensive search strategy which interrogates several electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials). • Hand searching key journals and checking reference lists of papers obtained. • Search strategy developed with care as a sequence of requirements for inclusion. • Quality assessment: • Decisions which studies to include. • Use explicit and objective criteria for inclusion or rejection based on quality e.g. only including RCT.

  5. Conducting a meta-analysis • Calculating effect size: • Trials often present results as a frequency of some outcome in intervention and control groups. • Meta-analysis usually summarised as a ratio of one versus other (e.g. odds ratio or relative risk). • Findings combined using appropriate statistical method. • Different methods depending on outcome (OR, RR, HR or risk difference). • Checking for publication bias: • Trials with negative findings less likely to be published. • Examine a funnel plot.

  6. Funnel plot

  7. Conducting a meta-analysis • Sensitivity analysis • Inclusion and aggregation of data may affect main findings. • Affect on outcome by altering approach to aggregation. • With no sensitivity analyses reader has to guess on likely impact of these important factors.

  8. Heterogeneity • Concern regarding meta-analysis is the extent to which they mix studies that are different in kind. • Difficulty is deciding which studies are combinable. • Studies can differ by types of patient (severity, comorbidity), intervention given and primary end point (death, disease, disability). • This can be tested for using statistical methods. • Depending on presence/absence of heterogeneity will influence the method of analysis of the meta-analysis data.

  9. Presenting findings

  10. limitations • Was the search strategy comprehensive and likely to avoid bias in the studies identified for inclusion • Was the publication bias assessed • Was the quality of the individual studies assessed using appropriate checklist of criteria • Was the combined effect size calculated using appropriate statistical methods • Was heterogeneity considered and tested for.

  11. Summary • Statistical technique for combining the findings from independent studies. • Most often used to assess the clinical effectiveness of healthcare interventions • Combining data from two or more RCTs • Precise estimate of treatment effect giving due weight to the size of the trial • The validity of the analysis depends on the quality of the systematic review on which it is based • Good analyses: • Complete coverage of all relevant studies • Look for presence of heterogeniety • Assess robustness of findings using sensitivity analysis

More Related