1 / 15

CARTAGENA PROTOCOL ON BIOSAFETY TO THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY

CARTAGENA PROTOCOL ON BIOSAFETY TO THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY. By Shadrack R. Moephuli (Dr.) Registrar: GMO Act 5 August 2003. What is this Protocol?. International Agreement – CBD auspices Article 19, para 3 & 4; articles 8(g) & 17 – CBD

kovit
Télécharger la présentation

CARTAGENA PROTOCOL ON BIOSAFETY TO THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CARTAGENA PROTOCOL ON BIOSAFETY TO THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY By Shadrack R. Moephuli (Dr.) Registrar: GMO Act 5 August 2003

  2. What is this Protocol? • International Agreement – CBD auspices • Article 19, para 3 & 4; articles 8(g) & 17 – CBD • Principle 15 of Rio Declaration on Environment and Development • Regulatory Mechanism for Trans-boundary movement of living modified organisms (LMO)

  3. Today’s Discussion? • Who does what? • How is it coordinated? • What is the impact on agricultural trade? • Lessons?

  4. Who does what? (Control Measures on GMO’s) • Domestic (National) Obligations • GMO Act • NEMA • Biodiversity Bill • National Biotechnology Strategy • Regulations on Food Labelling • International Obligations • Cartagena Protocol on Biodiversity • Convention on Biological Diversity • CODEX Alimentarius • WTO • International Undertaking on Genetic Resources

  5. The Aims of the Act To provide for measures to promote the responsible development, production, use and application of genetically modified organisms (including importation, production, release and distribution) shall be carried out in such a way as to limit possible harmful consequences to the environment; to give attention to the prevention of accidents and effective management of waste etc…

  6. Who are the Parties? • As of 30 June 2003, 51 parties have ratified • 13 African countries: Lesotho, Kenya, Liberia, Tanzania, Mozambique, Uganda, Cameroon, Tunisia, Djibouti, Botswana, Mauritius, Ghana. • 16 EU countries: Bulgaria, Norway, Denmark, Austria, Belarus, France, Ukraine, Croatia, Spain, Sweden, Czech Republic, Slovenia, Luxembourg, Moldova.

  7. Parties (continued) • 10 countries of Asia Pacific region: Fiji, Nauru, Samoa, Niue, Bhutan, Maldives, India, Marshall Islands, Oman, Palau • 10 countries of Central and South America: Trinidad & Tobago, St Kitts & Nevis, Bolivia, Venezuela, Nicaragua, Cuba, Ecuador, Colombia, Barbados, Panama • 1 country of North America: Mexico

  8. Who has not ratified? • China • Brazil • Canada • Argentina • Australia • USA • South Africa • Major Grain exporters? • GMO in Agriculture?

  9. Bio-Safety Structures • Executive Council • Registrar • Advisory Committee • Inspectors • Appeals • Regulations

  10. THE CARTAGENA PROTOCOL ON BIOSAFETY (CPB) • Entry into force: 11 September 2003 • Key provisions for full members: • Documentation for shipments • Information flow to other parties • Clearing House Mechanism • Advanced Informed Agreement

  11. PROTOCOL vs GMO ACT LMO Protect biological diversity Risks to human health Trans-boundary Handling and use GMO Protect biological diversity Risks to human health Import & Export Development Production Use Application

  12. Practical Implications? Governments Regulatory Commitments Budgetary implications Commitments of Exporting countries Commitments of Importing countries Resource Implications Private Sector Obligations for permits Cost implications Delays Compliance

  13. Actual Situation? • Currently more than 100 million tonnes of international trade in commodities affected by this Protocol. • Protocol has no transitional measures: • Most international trade in commodity maize and soybean could become illegal by 11 September 2003 if either the importing or exporting country is a Party to the Protocol. • Main effect may be on emergency food aid shipments in the short term • Countries of illegal import can sue countries of origin of these commodities for removal or destruction (art. 24) • Possible demand for capacity building before accepting shipments (SADC neighbours?)

  14. Impact on Agricultural Trade • Agricultural trade is regulated by Governments, but Operated by the Private Sector • Poor/confusing regulatory systems – repercussions throughout the economy • Increase in transactional cost due to complexity of current GM regulatory framework (e.g. price of maize in Jan to June 2002 from R1500 to R2000/ton due to permit requirements) • Regulatory confusion – Private Sector becomes cautious: safety ring

  15. Impact on Agricultural Trade (continued) • Private Sector Safety Ring example: • EU Retailers demands • Botswana and Namibia Beef Exports • Cost of food? Food Aid? • Requests from SA exporters? • Clarity on labelling and cost implications? • Competent Authority – Dept of Agriculture • Public Awareness Programme • Amendments to GMO Act?

More Related