1 / 17

Food Policy Councils

Food Policy Councils. Mark Winne, Food Policy Council Project Director, Community Food Security Coalition – mark@foodsecurity.org , www.foodsecurity.org Executive director of the Hartford (Conn.) Food System (1979 – 2003)

kreeli
Télécharger la présentation

Food Policy Councils

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Food Policy Councils Mark Winne, Food Policy Council Project Director, Community Food Security Coalition – mark@foodsecurity.org, www.foodsecurity.org Executive director of the Hartford (Conn.) Food System (1979 – 2003) Co-founder Hartford Food Policy Council: Conn. Food Policy Council; member of Santa Fe FPC Provider of technical assistance to over 150 food policy councils, networks, and coalitions Author of Food Rebels, Guerrilla Gardeners, and Smart-Cookin’ Mamas and Closing the Food Gap: Resetting the Table in the Land of Plenty

  2. Why Have Food Policy Councils “No major famine has ever occurred in a functioning democracy with regular elections, opposition parties, basic freedom and a relatively free media (even when the country is very poor).” Amartya Sen, Nobel Laureate

  3. To Address Food System Challenges in Indian Country • Diet-related illnesses – Diabetes (NM Dept. of Health survey: 33% of American Indian 3rd graders obese; 22% of all 3rd graders) • Poverty, geographic isolation, and limited access to healthy, affordable, and culturally appropriate food • Loss of food sovereignty (see High Country News on loss of farmland and fishing: http://www.hcn.org/issues/43.8/three-tribes-a-dam-and-a-diabetes epidemic

  4. Food Policy Councils (FPCs) Complement the Work of the Private and Public Sectors • The “3-Ps” of effective community food system work: Projects, Partners, and Policies • The private (for-profit and non-profit) and public sectors have developed numerous food and farm projects, programs, businesses, and services at the state and local levels • Partnerships have been forged to improve networking, coordination, and collaboration • But local and state public food policies have not been fully engaged to promote a just and sustainable food system. This is the primary task of FPCs. • Food Policy: The actions and in-actions of all levels of government that influence the supply, quality, price, production, distribution and consumption of food

  5. FPCs: What They Do and How They Operate • No state or local government has a “Department of Food”; FPCs can be a de facto Dept. of Food • They can serve as a food system planning venue for nutrition and health, food security, natural resources and food production, and the food economy • Membership is comprised of representatives from an area’s food system: government (local or state), academia, community members, farmers and gardeners, food banks, restaurants, retailers, and faith communities • They work to coordinate and focus numerous government functions – health, planning, economic development, education, agriculture, social services – around local or state food system concerns • FPCs tend to be advisory; they address local/state food regulatory, budgeting, legislative, programmatic, and administrative functions

  6. FPC Operation (cont’d) • FPCs can work across (synergistically) government lines; they look for intersections between programs at all levels of government • FPCs conduct public education and awareness campaigns such as the promotion of local food buying or to highlight the need for an obesity reduction initiative; may conduct community food assessments • Organizational: FPCs can be created by state statute or local ordinance, an executive order, or may be independently organized (government agencies participate but FPC is not a part of government); can also be organized as non-profits. • Private, non-profit groups often conduct grass-roots advocacy to create FPCs, and may provide staff, funding, and other resources • FPCs may link to other local efforts such as an obesity reduction coalition or a mayor’s office of sustainability

  7. Types of Networks • Cooperating: Low risk to members; little chance of systems change; can model best practices, test ideas, convene problem-solving sessions • Coordinating: low to moderate risk; better chance of systems change; can push organizational boundaries; engage in activities requiring greater mutual reliance • Collaborating: Moderate to high risk to members; best chance of systems change; methods in place to resolve conflicts; pursuing long-term system creation; radical shift from past operations

  8. What Do We Know about FPCs?(based on recent FPC survey by Food First and CFSC) • We estimate there are 100 FPCs in North America (only a few in Canada) • 75 FPCs were contacted for the survey; 39 FPCs responded: 7 state, 17 county or multi-county (regional), and 14 city • A small number are joint city/county FPCs • About 50% of FPCs have no staff; 40% have less than 1 FTE; 10% have 1 to 3 FTEs • Most (60%) of state FPCs are part of gov’t; some (20 to 40%) of local/county FPCs are a part of or have a strong connection to gov’t • Between 8 and 28% of FPCs have no funding; between 16 and 50% receive some gov’t funding; Foundations fund about 25% of FPCs • The federal sources of FPC funding are the Community Food Project Competitive Grant Program and CDC; Community foundations, local, county, and state governments

  9. Kansas City Origins: Grew out of interest of KC Healthy Kids and local health care foundations Organization: Independent; operates under auspices of KC Health Kids and serves 9 counties and 2 states Leadership: 1 full-time staff with support from KC Healthy Kids and other local and state groups Big Break: Interest in Farm Bill translated into interest for local food policy Issues and Outcomes: Prepared several policy briefs; modernized KC’s agriculture zoning code; co-hosted food summit; conducted a food issues survey with candidates for local office

  10. Baltimore • Origins: Comm. Food Assessment conducted by Johns Hopkins U. and community organization • Organization: Housed within city planning dept. but supported by local foundations and city funds; large number of food system sector representatives advise the Food Policy Director • Leadership: City Planning, Johns Hopkins, and numerous community organizations • Big Break: Press conference with Mayor attracted major media attention (CNN, CBS, NPR) • Issues and Outcomes: Expanded “virtual supermarket,” created farmers’ market coalition; secured EBT for farmers’ markets; zoning changes for urban agriculture.

  11. FPC Actions and Accomplishments • New Mexico Food & Ag. Policy Council: School nutrition rules for competitive foods; expanded farm to school funding; expanded funding for NMSU Extension support for tribal nations; working on a new economic development initiative to address the lack of high quality grocery stores in rural “food deserts”, including tribal communities; irrigation project in Navajo community • Cleveland/Cuyahoga County FPC: Secured zoning changes to protect community gardens, urban farms, and raising of chickens and bees; expanded urban ag. with city economic development funds, and promoted use of public purchasing for locally grown food; working with Case Western Reserve U. and Oberlin College to buy local food

  12. FPC Actions cont’d… • Missoula, Mont. FPC working with county land use board to direct development away from prime farm and ranchland; modified or rejected over 25 subdivision proposals; chicken and bee regulations; mapped prime agricultural soils • Boulder County FPC developing sustainable agriculture use plan for 25,000 publicly-owned acres of farmland; rejected proposal to plant GE sugar beet seeds • Fresno, CA food policy coalition secured zoning changes for farmers’ markets and community gardens; included food-related components for 9,000 acre annexation

  13. Muscogee (Creek) FPC • First Native American Food Policy Council – Tribal Res. 10-079 passed 9/25/10 • Food and fitness council promotes farming, gardening, hunting, traditional foods, food sovereignty, healthy eating • Partners: HIS, Health Div., Tribal leg., Exec. And Judicial branches, Mvskoke Food Sovereignty Initiative, farmers

  14. FPC Action cont’d… • City of Hartford FPC worked with city WIC agency to improve service delivery that restored WIC caseload to 10,000 from 6,000 persons; conducted public transportation study that led to the creation of a new bus route that connects the city’s lowest income residents to new supermarkets; • State of Connecticut FPC conducted major public education campaign regarding loss of the state’s farmland that resulted in the development of $30 million per year in state funding for farmland preservation, a farm to school initiative, and farm viability grant program; coordinated and improved the delivery of nutrition education services that were previously operated independently by 5 separate state agencies; developed a plan that brought the EBT program to most of the state’s farmers’ markets; currently working on the development of new livestock slaughter and processing facilities

  15. FPCs in the Pipeline • City of Seattle and King County formed regional Puget Sound FPC • Salt Lake City FPC is the “food expert” on the newly formed Mayor’s Office of Sustainability • Louisville, KYand Birmingham, AL recently formed FPCs • New York City doesn’t have FPC, but has several broad city-sponsored food initiative, e.g. Food Works • Los Angles established FPC under auspices of Mayor’s office • Legislation created a Massachusetts Food Policy Council

  16. FPCs – Opportunities and Challenges • With limited resources and occasional resistance from large food and agriculture groups, FPCs have demonstrated the ability to identify, and secure important local and state policy gains • Their comprehensive focus – from food security to sustainability – often makes FPCs the only place where systemic and coordinated local or state food system work take place • Given the enormous complexity of the food system, the number of stakeholders, and the vast array of local, state, and federal food and farm programs, well-staffed and adequately resourced local and state food system planning, educating, and coordinating entities have become an increasing necessity • FPCs should receive additional financial and training support to expand their numbers and effectiveness, and to ensure a just and sustainable food system for all

  17. Lessons Learned • Relationships count; cultivate them • Be inclusive of a wide range of interests • On conflict: work for consensus; foster climate of healthy debate but don’t expect to take on the oligopolistic forces of multi-national agribusiness • Educate yourselves, the general public, and policy makers constantly • Community food assessment is an on-going enterprise, not a one-time act • Look for synergy between – and be aware of – relationships between all levels of government • Cultivate good leadership and FPC champions

More Related