1 / 13

ENGIN 112 Intro to Electrical and Computer Engineering Lecture 32 Hazards

ENGIN 112 Intro to Electrical and Computer Engineering Lecture 32 Hazards. Overview. Minimum sum of products implementation reduces costs Propagation delays in circuits can lead to output glitches Hazards can be determined from K-map Technique using K-maps to avoid hazards

ktrombly
Télécharger la présentation

ENGIN 112 Intro to Electrical and Computer Engineering Lecture 32 Hazards

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ENGIN 112Intro to Electrical and Computer EngineeringLecture 32Hazards

  2. Overview • Minimum sum of products implementation reduces costs • Propagation delays in circuits can lead to output glitches • Hazards can be determined from K-map • Technique using K-maps to avoid hazards • Look for neighboring circles • Hazards are less of a concern for sequential circuits. • Combinational outputs settle prior to rising clock edge

  3. input output input output time propagation delay Combinational Delay • Logic gates do not produce an output simultaneously with a change in input. • There is a finite propagation delay through all gates.

  4. A B Q D High High glitch A D B (C) Q Example of Combinational Hazards • Eg. Q = AB’ + BD if B & D are 1 then Q should be 1 but because of propagation delays, if B changes state then Q will become unstable for a short time, as follows: (C)

  5. Hazards/Glitches • Hazards/glitches: unwanted switching at the outputs • Occur when different paths through circuit have different propagation delays • Dangerous if logic causes an action while output is unstable • May need to guarantee absence of glitches • Usual solutions • 1) Wait until signals are stable (by using a clock): preferable (easiest to design when there is a clock – synchronous design) • 2) Design hazard-free circuits

  6. 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 Types of Hazards • Static 1-hazard • Input change causes output to go from 1 to 0 to 1 • Static 0-hazard • Input change causes output to go from 0 to 1 to 0 • Dynamic hazards • Input change causes a double changefrom 0 to 1 to 0 to 1 OR from 1 to 0 to 1 to 0

  7. AB 00 01 11 10 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 D Hazard Elimination • Hazards like these are best eliminated logically. The Karnaugh Map of the required function gives one method. • Covering the hazard causing the transition with a redundant product term (AD) will eliminate the hazard. The hazard free Boolean equation is: • Q = AB’+BD+AD AB’ BD AD

  8. A A S B B F S S' S' F hazard static-0 hazard static-1 hazard Static Hazards • Due to a literal and its complement momentarily taking on the same value • Thru different paths with different delays and reconverging • May cause an output that should have stayed at the same value to momentarily take on the wrong value • Example

  9. A F 3 2 B 1 C Dynamic Hazards • Due to the same versions of a literal taking on opposite values • Thru different paths with different delays and reconverging • May cause an output that was to change value to change 3 times instead of once • Example: A C B1 B2 B3 F hazard dynamic hazards

  10. Hazard Example • Logic gates do not produce an output simultaneously with a change in input. • There is a finite propagation delay through all gates.

  11. Hazard Removal for Static 0 • Locate boundaries between circles • Add an extra circle (product term) to eliminate hazard • Note: addition of term does not lead to minimum sum of products implementation.

  12. Hazard Removal Result • Addition of extra AND gate and extra OR gate input • Generally does not slow down circuit • Not as important for sequential circuits

  13. Summary • When inputs change, intermediate values created • Could lead to incorrect circuit behavior • Hazards can be determined from K-map • Technique using K-maps to avoid hazards • Use additional implicants • Hazards not as important for sequential design • Hazard removal requires additional hardware

More Related