1 / 14

ECONOMIC EFFECTIVENESS: Supplemental Security Income Program 1984 vs. 1999

ECONOMIC EFFECTIVENESS: Supplemental Security Income Program 1984 vs. 1999. Teran Martin Colorado College Department of Economics Teran_Martin@Alumni.ColoradoCollege.edu. Supplemental Security Income Means-tested transfer program Benefits the needy aged (65+), blind, and disabled

kueng
Télécharger la présentation

ECONOMIC EFFECTIVENESS: Supplemental Security Income Program 1984 vs. 1999

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ECONOMIC EFFECTIVENESS: Supplemental Security Income Program 1984 vs. 1999 Teran Martin Colorado College Department of Economics Teran_Martin@Alumni.ColoradoCollege.edu

  2. Supplemental Security Income Means-tested transfer program Benefits the needy aged (65+), blind, and disabled Targets individuals without significant work experience unable to engage in substantial gainful activity Program Background

  3. Legislative History • The Social Security Disability Benefits Reform Act of 1984 • Supreme Court case 493 US 521, Sullivan v. Zebley • The Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 • The Americans with Disabilities Act and Fair Housing Act

  4. Data • Survey of Income and Program Participation matched to SSA administrative records • 795 SSI observations in the 1984 SIPP-SSA matched data file • 1,100 SSI observations in the 1999 SIPP-SSA matched data file

  5. Data Tests • Equality of means test (Ho: 1999 = 1984) • Can reject Ho at the α = .01 confidence level for most of the variables • Econometric modeling • Age, Marital Status, Own Home are statistically significant in determining the amount of SSI benefits • Chow test indicates that the 1984 and 1999 regression lines are statistically different • Statistical analysis of demographic, income and poverty status characteristics

  6. Demographic Characteristics • Major changes in marital status • % widowed decreased; % divorced/separated and never married increased • Decrease in average age • Substantial growth in disability component • Increase in educational attainment • Most still have high school education or less • % female decreased • % Hispanic increased

  7. Income • Increase in the % of beneficiaries with recent work experience • Changes in the composition of family income • Social Security income less important • Earnings more important • Mean personal and family income increased

  8. Poverty Status • Poverty rate decreased by 5.4 percentage points • SSI benefits were less effective in reducing the poverty gap in 1999 • Increase in the reduction of the poverty gap for those under 18

  9. What do these results tell us? • More or less effective? • Policy implications?

  10. Effectiveness Definition • Cost - benefit analysis not applicable • “The extent to which a goal or set of goals is achieved” (Quade 1989)

  11. Program Goals/Principles • Provide: • Nationally uniform eligibility requirements and benefit standards • An assistance source of last resort • Incentives and opportunities for those beneficiaries to work or reduce their dependency on public assistance • An efficient and economical method of providing assistance • Inducements to for states to provide supplementation • Appropriate coordination of the SSI program with other programs

  12. More Effective • Provided more uniform eligibility across categories • Granted a larger student income exclusion • Required states to pass along the annual increase in benefits to account for inflation • Increased the total number of beneficiaries • Included more beneficiaries that had worked in the previous one to three years, received Food Stamp, housing and energy assistance • Reduced the proportion living in the 50-125 percent of the poverty threshold

  13. Less Effective • Not as able to target low income individuals • Decreased proportion of SSI beneficiaries participating in medical assistance programs • Slightly less proportional reduction in the poverty gap was

  14. Conclusions • Overall, more effective in 1999 • Policy implications • Closely Examine characteristics that indicated the SSI program was less effective in 1999 • Increase early intervention type programs

More Related