1 / 46

Revitalizing the Golden Horn Persembe Pazari-Galata Area: Connecting Bridges and Preserving Heritage

This project aims to analyze the urban problems, weaknesses, and potentials of the Golden Horn Persembe Pazari-Galata area in Istanbul, and propose a master plan to revitalize the district. The focus is on creating connectivity, preserving historical buildings, improving access to waterfront areas, and promoting mixed-hybrid uses. The project also includes architectural solutions and unique programming to enrich urban life in the area.

kyledaniel
Télécharger la présentation

Revitalizing the Golden Horn Persembe Pazari-Galata Area: Connecting Bridges and Preserving Heritage

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. connecting2bridges with1monument onGOLDEN HORN PERŞEMBE PAZARI-GALATAand UNKAPANIBRIDGES Istanbul Technical University . Department of Architecture….Assist.Prof.Dr. Dilek Yıldız . 6.07.2011… Hannover

  2. GOLDEN HORN

  3. PersembePazariis a district in downtown Istanbul where most of the iron and steel merchants' shops were located…..

  4. weaknesses… access problem… complexity in circulation…. uncontrolled traffic and mixed routes blocks access… physical-visual barriers… cars park everywhere cars scattered around the whole site

  5. weaknesses… abondened buildings… physical deterioration and decay… dark streets during night... have potential for crime…

  6. potentials /opportunities… rich historical background… close location to Galata Bridge… fish market attracts people…

  7. potentials /opportunities… connection to the sea waterfront/shoreline richness… wonderful view options… narrow streets leading to sea… enabling framed/surprising views towards to the opposite waterfront…

  8. potentials /opportunities… visual and physical connection with Galata Tower… several landmarks –mosques and fountaion- around the site…

  9. what students were expected to do: analyze the area define urban problems, weaknesses and potentials of the site propose a master plan for the whole area focus on a specific spot that needs special attention propose an architectural solution develop a unique programme and scenario for a spesific site like public buildings incuding art, culture, communication, performance, exhibition and new-media etc. that will enrich urban life

  10. concepts… global/local…private/public…natural/manmade… interior/exterior… macro/micro scales… new/old… historic/modern…pure/hybrid… renovation/decay/preservation… dynamic/static…vertical/horizantal expansion… integration/segregation… compose/decompose... silhouette…skyline… green areas… pedestrian/vehicularcirculation, movement… connectivity historical heritage continuity of urban spaces and vistas …promenade…recreation…

  11. design principals… • Enabling penetration among functional zones for mixed-hybrid uses • Providing rich access options to waterfront areas and enriching them with recrational uses and better landscape designs • Preserving historic buildings as much as possible and re-using of vacant and underused buildings. • Providing continuity among sub-districts and urban spaces • Promoting tourist-based uses • Preserving industrial uses • Preserving existing Thursday market and fish market as being significant identity giving features to the site • Opening up visual axes for perceiving urban landscape • Encouraging co-existince of industry-retail shops, tourism, office, recreation… • Connecting routes with scaled urban-public spaces • Cleaning up all unnecassary old constructions around the historical buildings in order to make easy to perceive them and reuse them with appropriate functions. • Paying attention to public uses rather than private ones.. • Making clear connections to Galata bridge. • Creating permeable and responsive environment…

  12. moira rodriguez COSTA francisco ferrandez ALACID Cars, buses, ferries, trams and pedestrians their routes are all mixed up into each other Main pedestrian axes which provides links to the urban grid

  13. MIXED/seperated-defined ROUTES Routes mixed: workers…quickers..slowers Chaotic..noise Routes seperated: calm and quiet slowers workers quickers

  14. searching routes… new buildings on the west/ renewing and protecting buildings on the east… creating inland water areas

  15. creating small public spaces in dense historic fabric proposed new building as barrier to pollution and noise coming from the main road defining green areas and swimming pool on the shoreline in close contact with Golden Horn

  16. strong connections with the city continues axes between city texture and and golden horn changing the location and direction of harbour

  17. MUSEUM….new proposal

  18. yaşar KAYHAN section-silhoutte from Galata Tower to the sea… analyzing its stepping-cascading nature… keeping that skyline continue and interpreting it in a new way…

  19. mehmet ali SARAÇOĞLU a landmark-icon building design on the shoreline of Karaköy a new public route with ramps and staircases… enabling people to perceive Golden Horn on different levels…

  20. özlem ACAR the stepped-cascading nature of the masses of the site both in section and elevation…. layer4 galata layer3 main road layer2 perşembe pazarı layer1 waterfront between foreground and background …………………some silhoutte layers

  21. new constructions on the lots where buildings in a very bad conditions located half preserved -preserving the outer skin and refunctioning- and totally preserved buildings coherence with the existing urban fabric more efficient use of the waterfronts

  22. başak ÖZAYDIN disappearing x appearing in the topography… building organized in such a way that it melts ad mixed into the topography… organizing a continues mass and circulation routes towards to the sea… building perceived as a mass where it faces to the main road as a transition zone from masses to landscape… and then becomes a landscape itself…

  23. STRONG CONNECTIONS on the perpendicular axis to the sea… WEAK CONNECTIONS on the parallel axis to the sea… New building design does not make strong connections on its left and right sides since the mass finishes in a sharp way on that direction…. What we expected from her to make the masses melt gradually on the left and right hand sides of the building…

  24. concluding remarks… PURPOSE… teaching more about the city and how to grasp the problems at urban scale and connecting those problems to the architectural solutions… discussing the relations between city and architecture… PROCESS… two important stages was urban design and architectural design. none of the students were successfull at both stages…some students grasped urban level well, some students grasped architectural level well… THE NUMBER OF STUDENTS … since the number of students (6) was too less, it was a big disadvantage for creating a group synergy which affected the success of the students strongly … BACKGROUND LEVEL OF STUDENTS… scale of the site was too big to cope with for them, they had difficulty in grasping the whole area…

  25. concluding remarks… OPEN ENDED-VAGUE DESIGN PROBLEM… where the building will locate in and its programme were supposed to be defined by students according to the requirements of the site, this was a vague question for them, they have spent lots of time even in deciding what to do and where… it was good for them to face with such a vague problem that they had no familiarity before…

  26. thank you!!!!

More Related