1 / 15

An Analysis of Superbowl Volatility

An Analysis of Superbowl Volatility. Sean Puneky 10 February 2009. Initial Theory. A study in Behavioral Economics Traders trade what they know

kynan
Télécharger la présentation

An Analysis of Superbowl Volatility

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. An Analysis of Superbowl Volatility Sean Puneky 10 February 2009

  2. Initial Theory • A study in Behavioral Economics • Traders trade what they know • Theory: If traders witness a commercial from a major add campaign, they are more likely to develop trading ideas for the stock, increasing the volatility of the stock • Volatility should reflect fundamentals, not trader behavior

  3. A Testable Hypothesis • Test uses data from a major event like the Superbowl where many companies release their best commercials • Companies that advertise in the Superbowl should see the Realized Volatility of their share prices increase on days following the Superbowl

  4. Structure of the Test • A one sided t-test is used comparing the volatility before the Superbowl to the volatility after • Variables for t-test: • Equation:

  5. Structure of Data • Data sets are means of the Realized Variances from an 8 minute sampling interval on the five trading days before and after the Superbowl • Log(mean) from before the Superbowl subtracted from the log(mean) from after the Superbowl for each year • T-test performed with null hypothesis that difference is equal to zero

  6. Stocks Chosen • Working with three stocks: PEP (Pepsi), KO (Coke), and FDX (Fed Ex) • Both Pepsi and Fed Ex advertised in the Superbowl over the testing period while Coke advertised only before the Superbowl in 1998-2006

  7. Volatility Signature Plot of PEP

  8. PEP Histogram

  9. Volatility Signature Plot of KO

  10. KO Histogram

  11. Volatility Signature Plot of FDX

  12. FDX Histogram

  13. T-Test Results (9df) • PEP • T-value of 2.27714421054183 • Significant at 2.5% level (t>2.26216) • KO • T-value of -0.250909814238321 • Not significant • FDX • T-value of -0.645862272357625 • Not significant

  14. Conclusions • Although PEP and KO show promising results, FDX is inconsistent with theory • PEP volatility increases without any change in the fundamental value of PEP

  15. Extensions • Investigate the FDX dilemma • Examine the effects of weighting Superbowls by viewership or price of air time • Expand analysis to other ad campaigns

More Related