1 / 31

Child Deprivation Domestic Violence and Visitation

Child Deprivation Domestic Violence and Visitation. Vicky O. Kimbrell Attorney at Law Georgia Legal Services Program www.GLSP.org.

kynton
Télécharger la présentation

Child Deprivation Domestic Violence and Visitation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Child Deprivation Domestic Violence and Visitation Vicky O. Kimbrell Attorney at Law Georgia Legal Services Program www.GLSP.org

  2. “The battered mother has to worry that if she leaves, the abuser will take her children, and if she doesn’t, that the government will.” Jill Zuccardy, attorney in Nicholson v. Williams

  3. Statistics on DV • One third to one quarter of women are battered • High conflict/stress relationships + • 60,000+ calls to shelter hotlines last year

  4. Why doesn’t she just leave? • Her childhood •  Isolation • Beliefs about marriage and/or men • FEAR - #1 reason • Safety • Lack of money • Threats to children • Promises • Lack of enforcement • Frequency/Severity of abuse

  5. The Child Endangerment Statute - Cruelty to Children • O.C.G.A. Sec. 16-5-70 • Second Degree - Such person, who is the primary aggressor, intentionally allows a child under the age of 18 to witness the commission of a . . .family violence battery • Such person, who is the primary aggressor, having knowledge that a child under l8 is present and sees or hears the act, commits family violence battery.

  6. The most important determinant of family reunification is • … Frequent and Consistent Visitation for the non-battering parent.

  7. Legal Requirements before Removal in Georgia • Continuation in the home contrary to the welfare of the child • Reasonable efforts by DFCS to prevent or eliminate the need for the removal - 15-11-58 • Such findings shall be made at every subsequent review • Relative Resource • Child’s health and safety is paramount - 15-11-58(a)(1) • Parents have right to zealous and competent representation. Indigent parents have right to appointed counsel

  8. Principles for an Effective and Humane CPS System - Greenbook • Safety, well-being and stability for children and families • Children in care of non-offending parent • Community service system with many points of entry • Differential response to families

  9. Principle I: Courts, lawyers, child protective agencies, domestic violence agencies must intervene to create safety, enhance well-being, and provide stability for children and their families. • Domestic violence perpetrators do not victimize only adults. • Where women are abused, their children are also often maltreated. • Services must be provided for the parent-victim to protect children. Erom: Effective Intervention in Domestic Violence & Child Maltreatment Cases – National Council of Juvenile & Family Court Judges - Greenbook

  10. Principle II: To ensure stability and permanency for children, courts and communities must try to keep children in the care of their non-offending parent. • Historically, mothers have been held responsible for batterer’s violence – failure to protect; • Shortsighted to remove children from care of their battered mothers rather than remove the batterer; • Link the safety of the children to safety of the mother; • Communities must develop a broad range of services and interventions for family violence –Natl. Assn. Of Public Child Welfare Administrators (1999) Guidelines for a Model System.

  11. Principle III: Responsibility for Family Violence Must be Placed Where it Belongs – On the Abuser • Criminal Responsibility • Civil Responsibility • Financial / Economic Responsibility • Batterer Intervention Programs • Parenting Training • Supervised Visitation • Drug/Alcohol Abuse Intervention – Not excuses, not causes of abuse.

  12. DV ToolKit - Tools to Effectively Intervene in DV Cases Where Children are at Risk • Do’s and Don’ts • Caseplans • TPOs • DV Shelters • Separation from Batterers • Evaluations • Counseling • Visitation

  13. Do Educate Victims on Separation resources -Places, shelters Financial resources, Child Support Public Benefits TANF, Food Stamps Medicaid, Peachcare SSI/SSD Public/Subsidized Hsg. PUP funds Victims Compensation Don’t Make Victim Responsible for Separation Mandate Separation without safety planning - More women are killed leaving than staying. 75% of homicides during separation Separation from Batterer

  14. Do Offer Services Relevant to the Safety Needs of the Victim and Children Don’t Order evaluations because “everybody” gets them - parenting classes won’t keep anyone safe Drug testing, mental health - being beaten is not a mental condition Evaluations

  15. Make each party responsible only for the actions they can control. If he knows where and when her classes/evaluations/tests/services are scheduled, she’s in danger - and the case plan put her there. FVIPS are never appropriate for victims Joint Case Plans Put Victims & Their Children in Danger

  16. Do Advise Client of Options Refer Client to Legal Services, Private Attys,Legal Advocate, Vic Asstc, SAAGs? Realistically explain benefits and risks of TPOs Don’t Mandate TPOs TPOs can Anger Batterer Mutual TPOs Use your authority to control victim Victim has more information than you upon which to make decisions Temporary Protective Orders

  17. Domestic and sexual violence ...threaten survivors’ employment and economic security, which in turn creates and sustains women’s poverty. A cruel irony, this economic instability then becomes one of the most formidable barriers to survivors escaping abuse.

  18. Economic Abuse • Don’t use lack of economic resources as a basis for taking children from parents. • Court has held that “by harm, the court means either physical harm or significant, long-term emotional harm; we do not mean merely social or economic disadvantages.” Clark v. Wade,273 Ga. 587 (2001)

  19. 2007 New Child Support Guidelines • Child support as an economic weapons • New child support complexities – new guidelines • Best interest of the child standard • Deviation allowed when parents attempting to establish safe home for children.

  20. What can lead to economic abuse? • Lack of child support in TPOs • Lack of property awards in TPOs • Injuries requiring medical attention • Debts - Credit abuse • Lack of Enforcement

  21. Custody and Batterers • Batterers are twice as likely to seek sole physical custody for their children than are non-violent fathers. • When batterers do press for custody, they are awarded it at the same rate of non-batterers, 50% of the time.

  22. Forced Joint Custody Forcing joint physical custody on unwilling parents results in high levels of parental conflict and re-litigation, leaving children with two tense and angry parents.

  23. Standards on Awarding Custody when FV - OCGA 19-9-1 (a)(2) – “In a proceeding awarding custody/visitation when family violence is found:” • Court shall consider as primary the safety and well-being of the child and parent who is the victim of family violence; • Court shall consider the perpetrator’s history of harming another; • If one parent is absent or relocates because of family violence such shall not be deemed abandonment of the child; • Court can order supervised visitation.

  24. Court shall consider as primary the safety and well-being of the child and parent who is the victim of family violence; Court shall consider the perpetrator’s history of harming another; If one parent is absent or relocates because of family violence such shall not be deemed abandonment of the child; Court can order supervised visitation. Visitation Centers Alternatives Visitation- OCGA 19-9-1 (a)(2) – in a proceeding awarding custody/visitation when family violence is found:

  25. Batterer Profile – Implications for Children* • The Charming Batterer – to the outside world • Behind Closed Doors • Control • Entitlement • Manipulation • Possessiveness

  26. Safety Planning • With the Adult • With the Children • Shelter Advocates - Experts in this area • Are DV Advocates on Case Panels in your community?

  27. Batters’ Impact on Family Dynamics • Interference with Mother’s Parenting • Sowing divisions within the Family • Use of the children as weapons • Retaliation for mother’s efforts to protect children

  28. How Can We Hold the Batterer Accountable for the Violence - Not the Victim? Separate Caseplans for Perpetrators

  29. Batterer Case Plans • Perpetrator will: • Commit no acts of violence; • Commit no intimidating acts, threats or verbal abuse • Remove all weapons • Comply with all court orders • Attend and comply with all FVIP recommendations • Not use physical violence against children

  30. Batterer case plans • Acknowledge past abuse • Comply with substance abuse recommendations • Comply with mental health recommendations • Pay child support as ordered

  31. “The total length of separations of mothers and children [that NY CPS] has caused is measured in years. The suffering and trauma it has caused cannot be measured.”Judge J. Weinstein, Findings of Fact, Nicholson v. Williams

More Related