1 / 9

Shared Converged Services

Shared Converged Services. StateNets / Net@Edu Conference February 13, 2008. Agenda. Voice Services at ENA Platform Design Service Features We can share! Shared Application Development A possible model for collaboration and sharing Q&A. ENA Converged Services. Brief History

lada
Télécharger la présentation

Shared Converged Services

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Shared Converged Services StateNets / Net@Edu Conference February 13, 2008

  2. Agenda • Voice Services at ENA • Platform Design • Service Features • We can share! • Shared Application Development • A possible model for collaboration and sharing • Q&A

  3. ENA Converged Services • Brief History • 2006: ENA decides to offer Voice/VoIP services • 2007: Offer Voice services to 6 customers (Pilot) • Install 1st Voice Platform • Intercarrier agreements with RBOCS/CLECs etc. • First 6 Pilot School Districts • Offering Focuses on Hosted PBX/IP Centrex and SIP Trunking Services • 2008: 20+ School Districts signed up for Services • ~20K IP Centrex End points • Multiple District-wide Trunking Solutions • Able to serve both Urban and Rural Districts

  4. Service Requirements • Carrier-class • Reliability of Telecommunications solution vitally important to K-12 community and their constituents • Future Looking • Architecture allows for integration w/ future converged services • Open Standards Architecture • SIP vs MGCP • Feature Rich • Features should be equivalent to what customers could get with proprietary CPE solutions

  5. Platform Architecture • Redundancy • Every key platform component is redundant (N+1) • Redundant IP and PSTN connectivity • Redundant utility power + battery + generator • Platform can experience multiple component failure without dropping a call • UPCOMING: Geographically diverse primary and backup platforms • We’ve tried to this right, and can share

  6. Multiple Layers of Administration • Regional/Wholesale Administration • School District/End Customer Administration • End User Configuration Control • End User Portal • Attendant Console

  7. Administrator’s Portal

  8. Model for Shared Application Development • Swisscom Model • Open Converged Services Platform available to developers world-wide • Mash-ups/widgets/scheduling apps etc. • Swisscom can deploy any developed apps/services in Switzerland • Contributors are free to deploy same services anywhere else

  9. Q&A

More Related