1 / 13

OpenGGCM Simulation vs THEMIS Observations in an Dayside Event

Wenhui Li and Joachim Raeder University of New Hampshire Marit Øieroset University of California, Berkeley THEMIS 2008 UCLA. OpenGGCM Simulation vs THEMIS Observations in an Dayside Event. THEMIS Observations on 06/03/2007 ( Øieroset et. al. 2008). Northward IMF with strong By

lajos
Télécharger la présentation

OpenGGCM Simulation vs THEMIS Observations in an Dayside Event

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Wenhui Li and Joachim Raeder University of New Hampshire Marit Øieroset University of California, Berkeley THEMIS 2008 UCLA OpenGGCM Simulation vs THEMIS Observationsin an Dayside Event

  2. THEMIS Observations on 06/03/2007(Øieroset et. al. 2008) • Northward IMF with strong By during ~15:25 -- ~17:00 UT • THEMIS-B in the magnetosheath • THEMIS-A, C, D and E detect a layer of nearly-stagnant magnetosheath plasma (T ~ 1 keV, N ~ 3-6 cm-3) attached to the magnetopause on closed field lines • From TH-D to TH-A, magnetospheric ion and electron flux increases • Thickness of the layer ~ 0.9 RE • No evidence for Kelvin-Helmholtz waves nor diffusion at the local magnetopause • Particle distributions suggest double-high latitude reconnection involving the same field lines

  3. THEMIS Observations on 06/03/2007(Øieroset et. al. 2008)

  4. OpenGGCM Simulation vs THEMIS-A Observations NIMF CDPS MP

  5. OpenGGCM Simulation vs THEMIS-E Observations NIMF CDPS M.P.

  6. OpenGGCM Simulation vs THEMIS-C Observations NIMF CDPS M.P.

  7. OpenGGCM Simulation vs THEMIS-D Observations NIMF CDPS M.P.

  8. OpenGGCM Simulation vs THEMIS-B Observations M.P. NIMF

  9. OpenGGCM Simulation vs THEMIS Observations-- Thickness of the cold dense plasma layer THEMIS: ~ 1.1 RE along THEMIS track Simulation: ~ 1.3 RE values on the line passing THA at 16:30 UT CDPL IMF Open layer ~1.3

  10. How the cold dense plasma layer forms? • Double high-latitude reconnection captures magnetosheath plasma Solar Wind

  11. How the cold dense plasma layer forms? 2. New closed flux tubes slowly convect around magnetopause toward nightside -- results in a balance of inflow and outflow at dayside magnetopause and form a cold dense plasma layer Magnetic nulls Solar wind Frozen-in field lines An entry flow path (Li et. al. 2005)

  12. Summary • THEMIS observed cold dense plasma layer in dayside closed field attached to magnetopause • The multi spacecrafts estimated the thickness of the cold dense plasma layer to be ~0.9 RE • An OpenGGCM simulation reproduces the THEMIS observations • Observations and simulation analysis indicate that double high-latitude reconnection causes the formation of this cold dense plasma layer

  13. Additional Information A comprehensive study of magnetosphere under northward IMF conditions using OpenGGCM simulations can been found in: Solar wind plasma entry into the magnetosphere under northward IMF conditions Li et. al. 2008, JGR, newly published

More Related