1 / 18

Introduction to Proposed New

Introduction to Proposed New. July 22, 2014. This is a work in progress. Changes are happening based on field test and ongoing feedback. Why one ISP?. Oregon currently has 11 different ISP models used in various service settings Consistency for people supported and family members

lalasa
Télécharger la présentation

Introduction to Proposed New

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Introduction to Proposed New July 22, 2014

  2. This is a work in progress. Changes are happening based on field test and ongoing feedback.

  3. Why one ISP? • Oregon currently has 11 different ISP models used in various service settings • Consistency for people supported and family members • Assist in transitions across service settings • Improved quality of plans

  4. Advisory Group • Made up of stakeholders representing the array of service settings • Reviewed each existing ISP in Oregon as well as ISPs from other states • Responded to drafts developed by smaller work groups

  5. Partners in conversation • Plan of Care / Billing System • Employment First Implementation Team • Medicaid Waiver Unit and Oregon Health Authority • Licensing Unit

  6. Where are we now? • Started a field test in May • We will continue to learn from what works and what needs improvement • Statewide roll-out is anticipated by January 1 to coincide with implementation of new OARs

  7. The Plan • Captures what’s important TO and FOR the person from various perspectives Gather information from the person supported and others who know and care about the person

  8. For Field TestGathering Person Centered Info Our goals are to: • Avoid duplicate or redundant information • Give opportunity to those closest to the person to directly contribute vital information • Build on existing person centered planning tools and plans (e.g. ELP, ELISP, PFW, Customer Goal Survey)

  9. The Plan • Serious risks are identified and addressed Maintain instructions for staff to support identified risks (e.g. protocols, BSP, safety plans, etc.)

  10. The Plan • Connects assessed needs to specific chosen services (such as ADL and IADL support needs)

  11. Various goal implementation tools will be offered

  12. How the plan is developed • The person invites people they want to assist them with planning • We are using the field test to identify workflow methods that help teams develop ISPs effectively and efficiently • Coordinated with the Needs Assessment meeting

  13. Feedback from Trial Participants Highlights of LearningWhat Works • Loved the One Page Profile & Relationships page • Flexibility is apparent; discussion topics, goals, risk management strategies, gathering information • Person’s preferences are clear throughout the plan • CMS reviewed a draft and said we we’re on the right track

  14. Feedback from Trial Participants Highlights of LearningWhat needs more conversation • Asking the right questions when gathering person centered information. • How to best support the person’s choice of who plans with them • “I don’t want my provider present.” • “I don’t want you to talk about the serious risks in my life.”

  15. What’s next? • Visit OregonISP.org • Latest news • Sign up for email newsletter updates • Share feedback • This Fall we will announce training schedule for November and December

  16. Thank you! OregonISP.org

More Related