1 / 24

Modelling catchment sediment transfer: future sediment delivery to the Carlisle urban area

Modelling catchment sediment transfer: future sediment delivery to the Carlisle urban area . Tom Coulthard. Jorge A. Ramirez Paul Bates Jeff Neal. Blue, flood outline before, Red flood outline after. Project Aims/Summary.

lamond
Télécharger la présentation

Modelling catchment sediment transfer: future sediment delivery to the Carlisle urban area

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Modelling catchment sediment transfer: future sediment delivery to the Carlisle urban area Tom Coulthard Jorge A. Ramirez Paul Bates Jeff Neal

  2. Blue, flood outline before, Red flood outline after....

  3. Project Aims/Summary • To model sediment delivery from the Eden catchment and how this can affect flooding in Carlisle • Using CAESAR, to model morphological change in the Eden river catchmentand Carlisle reach • Use different climate & discharge records to simulate impact of climate and land cover change • Transfer updated DTM to Bristol for hydraulic modelling

  4. What is CAESAR? • Catchment or Reach based cellular model • Models Morphological Change • Hydrological model • Adaptation of TOPMODEL • Hydraulic model • Simple 2d steady state flow model • Sediment transport • Bedload, 9 fractions using Wilcock & Crowe eqtn. • Suspended sediment, multiple fractions • Slope Processes • Slope failure (landslips) • Soil Creep

  5. Main Tasks • Two modelling tasks: • 1. Model sediment and water from catchmentsdraining into Carlisle • 2. Model morphological changes in Carlisle reach

  6. 1. CAESAR catchment scale tasks • Produce sediment output for the Eden river at Carlisle • Existing climate • Climate scenarios • Land cover change

  7. Eden river sub-catchments Petteril • 50m spatial resolution • 6 sub-catchments • Divisions coincide with flow gauges Carlisle Irthing Caldew Lower Eden Upper Eden Eamont 25 Km

  8. Linking sub-catchments Carlisle Carlisle Deposition Erosion Discharge Sediment

  9. Initial conditions: grain size distribution • 40 sites visited • 173 photographs taken of • sediment on channel edge

  10. Initial conditions: grain size distribution Photo analysis technique utilized to estimate individual grain sizes Finer Sediment 20% Adjusted grain size distributions to add unmeasurable small grain sizes ( < 0.3mm ) Grain size distributions per catchment/reach Grain size distributions all records

  11. Initial conditions: grain size distribution

  12. Climate change: What we wanted to do... • Use UKCP09 weather generator to predict future rainfall • Use rainfall predictions as divers for the CAESAR morphological model • Generate sediment yields (and updated DEMs) for futures.

  13. Climate Eamont Upper Eden Lower Eden 200000 100000 Cumulative rainfall, mm 0 Irthing Caldew Petteril 200000 100000 0 200,000 0 200,000 200,000 0 400,000 0 400,000 600,000 400,000 600,000 600,000 Time, hours

  14. Catchment simulations • 75 year simulation • 13 years of hourly rainfall repeated and amplified by climate factor • 13 years chosen as only continuous period across all catchments/raingauges • Climate factor increased by 10, 20 and 30% • Record DEM’s and sediment outputs

  15. Catchment Sediment output Eamont Lower Eden Upper Eden 1000000 0 Cumulative sediment, m3 Irthing Petteril Caldew 1000000 0 200,000 0 200,000 200,000 0 400,000 0 400,000 600,000 400,000 600,000 600,000 Time, hours

  16. 2. CAESAR reach scale tasks • Produce future bed elevations for the Eden reach at Carlisle: • Determine how this affects flood inundation

  17. Water inputs Hourly Discharge 30000000 Eden Caldew 11% Petteril 5% Cumulative Discharge ( m3/sec) 20000000 10000000 Caldew Eden 84% Petteril 0 400,000 0 200,000 600,000 Time, hours

  18. Sediment inputs Petteril Lower Eden Caldew 1000000 Cumulative sediment, m3 0 200,000 0 200,000 200,000 0 400,000 0 400,000 600,000 400,000 600,000 600,000 Time, hours Hourly lumped sediment 83% 5% 12% Petteril Eden Caldew

  19. Changes in bed elevation Baseline +10% +30% +20% 6m(Erosion) -6m(Deposition)

  20. LISFLOOD-FP reference DTM • Model formulation with inertia (Bates et al., 2010) • 2D channel and floodplain. • Normal depth at boundary with slope 0.0006 mm-1 (Horritt et al., 2010) +30% Depth, m 11 0

  21. Bed elevations affect on flood levels Baseline +10% +30% +20% ∆ max water depth, m 3 (more flooding) Difference in maximum water elevation (new – original) (less flooding) - 2

  22. Previous trial runs (increasing sediment input) -50% Baseline +100% +50% 5m(Erosion) -6m(Deposition)

  23. Conclusions • Morphological changes in the channel can have profound influences on inundation levels • relative to changes in flooding caused by climate change? • Changes in flood level directly linked to erosion/deposition • Incision/aggradation alters conveyance • Changes in channel pattern (cutoff) have a fairly profound affect on inundation patterns • Relationship between discharge increase and changes in sediment yield is very site specific.. • Hard to apply a generic rule to all reaches

  24. Aggradation in urban areas..

More Related