1 / 19

Gauss ® Divergence òò D . ds = òòò r dv ® Ñ . D = r ( r )

Gauss ® Divergence òò D . ds = òòò r dv ® Ñ . D = r ( r ). . Alan Murray. Gauss ® Divergence … why, oh why??. òò D . ds = òòòr ( r )dv is clearly a useful means of calculating D and E from a macroscopic (i.e.sizeable!) distribution of charge

lanai
Télécharger la présentation

Gauss ® Divergence òò D . ds = òòò r dv ® Ñ . D = r ( r )

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Gauss® DivergenceòòD.ds = òòò r dv®Ñ.D = r(r)  Alan Murray

  2. Gauss®Divergence …why, oh why?? • òòD.ds = òòòr(r)dv is clearly a useful means of calculating D and E from a macroscopic (i.e.sizeable!) distribution of charge • It relates charge density in a volume of space to the field that it creates • We will want a relationship between charge density at a point r(r) and the fields E(r) and D(r) that it creates at that point • (honest, we will!) Cut to the chase Alan Murray – University of Edinburgh

  3. z y x Proof (non-examinable) Surface for Integration D,E Alan Murray – University of Edinburgh

  4. z Surface for Integration D,E y x Proof (non-examinable) Cut to the chase Argh!! I am shrinking!!! Alan Murray – University of Edinburgh

  5. dy z dx D,E dz y D =D(0,0,0) x Proof (non-examinable) Alan Murray – University of Edinburgh

  6. dy z dx dz y D =D(0,0,0) x Proof (non-examinable) D,E Alan Murray – University of Edinburgh

  7. z y D =D(0,0,0) x Proof (non-examinable) dy dx D,E dz Alan Murray – University of Edinburgh

  8. z y D =D(0,0,0+dz) D =D(0,0,0) x Proof (non-examinable) dy dx D,E dz Alan Murray – University of Edinburgh

  9. z y D =D(0,0,0) D =D(0,0+dy,0) x Proof (non-examinable) dy dx D,E dz Alan Murray – University of Edinburgh

  10. z y D =D(0,0,0) D =D(0+dx,0,0) x Proof (non-examinable) dy SKIP MATHS dx D,E dz Alan Murray – University of Edinburgh

  11. Now the maths … • Assume that, for example,D = (Dx,Dy,Dz) over the entire left hand face, the back face and the bottom face … all the faces that meet at the origin • D is different on the other 3 faces • Front face : D = (Dx+Dx,Dy,Dz) • Right face : D = (Dx,Dy+Dy,Dz) • Top face : D = (Dx,Dy,Dz+Dz) Alan Murray – University of Edinburgh

  12. Now the maths … • Left face : D = (Dx,Dy,Dz) • ds = (0, -dxdz, 0) • Right face : D = (Dx,Dy+Dy,Dz) • ds = (0, +dxdz, 0) • Bottom face : D = (Dx,Dy,Dz) • ds = (0, 0, -dxdy) • Top face : D = (Dx,Dy,Dz+Dz) • ds = (0, 0, +dxdy) • Back face : D = (Dx,Dy,Dz) • ds = (-dydz, 0, 0) • Front face : D = (Dx+Dx,Dy,Dz) • ds = (+dydz, 0, 0) Alan Murray – University of Edinburgh

  13. Now the maths … • òòD.ds = (Dx,Dy,Dz).(0, -dxdz, 0) + (Dx,Dy,Dz).(0, 0, -dxdy) + (Dx,Dy,Dz).(-dydz, 0, 0) + (Dx+Dx,Dy,Dz).(dydz, 0, 0) + (Dx,Dy+Dy,Dz).(0, dxdz, 0) +(Dx,Dy,Dz+Dz).(0, 0, dxdy) Alan Murray – University of Edinburgh

  14. These cancel These cancel These cancel Now the maths … • òòD.ds = -Dydxdz – Dzdxdy – Dxdydz+(Dx+Dx)dydz+(Dy+Dy)dxdz +(Dz+Dz)dxdy • = -Dydxdz – Dzdxdy – Dxdydz+(Dx+ dx¶Dx/¶x) dydz+(Dy+ dx¶Dy/¶y)dxdz +(Dz+ dx¶Dz/¶z)dxdy Alan Murray – University of Edinburgh

  15. dxdydz = dv Now the maths … • òòD.ds = (dx¶Dx/¶x) dydz+ (dx¶Dy/¶y)dxdz + (dx¶Dz/¶z)dxdy • = (¶Dx/¶x) dxdydz+ (¶Dy/¶y)dxdydz + (¶Dz/¶z)dxdydz • = (¶Dx/¶x) dv + (¶Dy/¶y)dv + (¶Dz/¶z)dv • òòD.ds = (¶/¶x, ¶/¶y, ¶/¶z). (Dx,Dy, Dz) dv Alan Murray – University of Edinburgh

  16. Now the maths … • òòD.ds = (¶/¶x, ¶/¶y, ¶/¶z) .(Dx,Dy,Dz)dv • òòD.ds = Ñ.Ddv = charge enclosed • Ñ.Ddv = òòò r dv • for an infinitesimally small volume dv, r is constant • Ñ.Ddv = ròòò dv = rdv • Ñ.D = r(r) • This is the differential, or “at-a-point” version of Gauss’s law, often called the Divergence Theorem • (¶/¶x, ¶/¶y, ¶/¶z) = Ñ is the Divergence Operator Alan Murray – University of Edinburgh

  17. Gauss’s Law/Divergence Theorem • òòD.ds = òòò r(r)dv • Ñ.D = r(r) • These are equivalent • Ñ = (¶/¶x, ¶/¶y, ¶/¶z) Alan Murray – University of Edinburgh

  18. Not the same as “to diverge” Q The electric field here diverges, but its DIVERGENCE is zero at this point, as there is no charge present at the point, ρ=0. The electric field here diverges, and its DIVERGENCE is non-zero at this point, as there is charge present at the point, ρ>0. So what does Divergence “mean” E Alan Murray – University of Edinburgh

  19. Not the same as “to diverge” E The electric field does not diverge and its DIVERGENCE is zero at this point, as there is no charge present at the point, ρ=0. The electric field here does not diverge, and its DIVERGENCE is non-zero at this point, as there is charge present at the point, ρ>0. So what does Divergence “mean” Alan Murray – University of Edinburgh

More Related