1 / 18

Bear Stearns decision

Bear Stearns decision. Stephen Gale . 26 November 2007. Contents. General observations Practical considerations arising (Comparative issues under EU Reg). SPhinX Bear Stearns Sept 06 Sept 07 (Robert D. Drain J (Burton R. Lifland J USBC-NYSD) USBC – NYSD)

landen
Télécharger la présentation

Bear Stearns decision

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Bear Stearns decision Stephen Gale 26 November 2007

  2. Contents • General observations • Practical considerations arising • (Comparative issues under EU Reg)

  3. SPhinX Bear Stearns • Sept 06 Sept 07 • (Robert D. Drain J (Burton R. Lifland J • USBC-NYSD) USBC – NYSD) • Business hedge fund tracker “open ended investment companies” • R/O Cayman Islands Cayman Islands • Incorporation Cayman Islands Cayman Islands • Applicant Cayman liquidators Cayman provisional liquidators • Application (1) Foreign main proceeding (1) foreign main proceeding (2) additional relief (2) additional relief (3) foreign non main • Trade - US - US/UK - none in Cayman - none in Cayman • Employees none none in Cayman • Offices none US • Assets - none in Cayman - all in US • - “substantially all” in US - (assets moved into Cayman after filing) • Manager of fund - Delaware Corporation - Massachusetts corporation • - located NYC - NYC manager • - registers Dublin Ireland • Directors - Irish, Bahamian, US 2 reside in Cayman • - no meetings Cayman • Investors - worldwide - UK

  4. Pre Chapter 15 • Related bankruptcy case under Chapter 7 or Chapter 11 • Limited bankruptcy proceedings ancillary to foreign case (304) • (e.g. injunctive relief stopping US law suits/creditor seizure US assets) • discretionary • to ensure “economical and expeditious administration” of estate, consistent with (inc) comity

  5. Chapter 15 • Foreign Main proceeding (comi) • automatic stay • discretionary “additional assistance” • foreign representative can operate business • seek avoidance of unauthorised post-petition transfers • Foreign non-main (establishment) • discretionary stay Note: subject to public policy exception “if action manifestly contrary to the public policy of the US”

  6. Comi (1502(4)) Not defined Establishment (1502(5)) “ any place of operations where the debtor carries out a non-transitory economic activity”

  7. The problems of SPhinX • manifestly did not apply new law properly….. • in attempting to achieve correct result (i.e. non recognition) – ignored provisions of Ch. 15 • especially in evidence to rebut COMI…… • and in giving sway to views of petitioner and other stakeholders without seeking objective test • left law in a mess • uncertainty & confusion

  8. The advantages of Bear Stearns • better application of new Ch. 15…… • nb. rebutable presumption re COMI • distinction: proof/evidence • presumption included for “speed and convenience of proof where there is no serious controversy” • “permits and encourages fast action in cases where speed essential” • rejected proposition that no one argued to the contrary • probably correct comi test • but………..

  9. Re “establishment” (the non main alternative) • “non-transitory economic activity” - (interpreted as local place of business) • “here the bar is rather high, especially in view of the Cayman Islands’ statutory prohibition against “exempted companies” engaging in business in the Cayman Islands except in furtherance of their business otherwise carried on outside Cayman Islands” • rejected “pragmatic” approach of SPhinX (“someone had to conduct the winding up”)

  10. The Appeal • “the legislative history of Ch. 15, international commentary, and the case law of this District all support a reading of Ch. 15 that is flexible and pragmatic, reflecting Congress’s intent to foster comity and cooperation between US and foreign courts. The Bankruptcy Court’s decision contradicts this reading. It should be reversed.”

  11. The Appeal • “Underguiding the Bankruptcy Court’s ruling was an inappropriate digression into substantive Cayman Island law and the Court’s erroneous view that companies registered as “exempted” under Cayman Island law can never have sufficient business in that country to satisfy Ch. 15’s recognition test” • “….an examination of substantive Cayman Island law reveals that there is nothing……. that prevents an exempted company from having its COMI or maintaining on “establishment” in the Cayman Islands”

  12. Evidence of, at least, “establishment” • 2 of 4 debtors in Cayman Islands • Both independent directors reside Cayman Islands and reviewed documents Cayman Islands • Pre-filing attorneys Cayman Islands • Pre-filing auditors Cayman Islands • Liquid assets Cayman Islands • Cayman Islands tax law • Invested in CDO’s under Cayman Islands law • Held out to be Cayman Islands companies • Governed by laws of Cayman Islands • Upon appointment of JPLs – exclusive Jn of Cayman Islands and board power ceased

  13. Basis Yield Alpha Fund (Basis) • Hearing date 15 January 2008 (but may be delay pending Bear Stearns appeal) • USBC - SDNY • Recognition under Ch. 15 as foreign main proceeding alternatively non main • No objection filed by any creditors • Cayman Islands “exempted company” • S426 relief – recognition in E & W (September 07) • NSW relief (October 2007) • SPhinX and Bear Stearns cited • “no controversy” re comi exists – unlike Bear Stearns

  14. SPhinXBear StearnsBasis Yield • Sept 06 Sept 07 • (Robert D. Drain J (Burton R. Lifland J (Robert E Gerber J ) • USBC-NYSD) USBC – NYSD) (January 08) (USBC-NYSC) • Business hedge fund tracker “open ended master fundinvestment companies” • R/O Cayman Islands Cayman Islands Cayman Island • Applicant Cayman liquidators Cayman provisional liquidators Cayman provisional liquidators • Incorporation Cayman Islands Cayman Islands Cayman Islands • Application (1) Foreign main proceeding(1) foreign main proceeding (1) foreign main proceedings(2) additional relief(2) additional relief (2) foreign non main(3) foreign non main (3) additional relief • Trade - US- US/UK - UK- none in Cayman- none in Cayman - US • - Australia • Employees nonenone in Cayman ? • Offices noneUS Cayman Islands (dormant) • Assets - none in Cayman- all in US dormant • - “substantially all” in US- (assets moved into Caymanafter filing • Manager of - Delaware Corporation- Massachusetts corporation - feeder fund in Cayman Islands • Fund - located NYC - NYC manager - administrators Cayman Islands • - registers Dublin Ireland - investment manager Cayman Islands • Directors - Irish, Bahamian, US2 reside in Cayman dormant • - no meetings Cayman • Investors - worldwide- UK - intention - US taxable investors

  15. Conclusion • Hopefully sanity, universality and jurisprudence will prevail either in Bear Stearns appeal or Basil • If not……..! • Good luck to Gabriel’s crusade but don’t hold your breath • Ch. 11? Not really suitable in Funds • Ch. 7 ? “hick practitioner off court rota”?!

  16. Comparative table of Chapter 15 of US Bankruptcy Code and European Council Insolvency Regulation (No.1346/2000) Please refer to attached PTO/…..

  17. CV • Stephen GalePartner, Corporate Recovery, London • Stephen is a solicitor and licensed Insolvency Practitioner. He has extensive experience of all aspects of insolvency and corporate recovery practice both in the UK and Asia. He is a past president of R3 (the UK restructuring, bankruptcy and turnaround professional body) and lectures widely on corporate recovery matters. He serves as an Honorary Senior Lecturer at the University College London’s department of law. • Stephen Gale • Tel: 020 7466 2878 • Email: stephen.gale@herbertsmith.com

  18. offices • Herbert Smith LLP, Gleiss Lutz and Stibbe are three independent firms which have a formal alliance

More Related