1 / 18

Grob spn Flutter Accident

Grob spn Flutter Accident. Gérard Guillaumaud 1961 - 2006. French Air Force NTPS graduate Competent and respected Grob Chief Test Pilot Active SETP member In his memory: EFTSW award. Grob spn project. Grob background Composite specialist since 1971

lani
Télécharger la présentation

Grob spn Flutter Accident

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Grob spn Flutter Accident

  2. European Flight Test Safety Workshop, Sept 28-29th 2010, London, UK Gérard Guillaumaud1961 - 2006 • French Air Force • NTPS graduate • Competent and respected • Grob Chief Test Pilot • Active SETP member • In his memory: EFTSW award

  3. European Flight Test Safety Workshop, Sept 28-29th 2010, London, UK Grob spn project • Grob background • Composite specialist since 1971 • Gliders, trainers and special purpose aircraft • 2004: spn light business jet launch • 8 passengers • All-composite • Conventional flight controls • First flight 2005

  4. European Flight Test Safety Workshop, Sept 28-29th 2010, London, UK Grob spn specification • Short field and long range! • Vmo 270 kts / Mmo M.70 • Ceiling 41.000 feet • Design and certification speeds: Vc Vmo 270 Vd 1.25Vc 338 Vflutter_min 1.2Vd 406 Certification speeds

  5. European Flight Test Safety Workshop, Sept 28-29th 2010, London, UK First Prototype (P1) • Demonstrator; FF 2005 • Limited/immature systems • No initial envelope expansion • Eventually max ~280 kts CAS based on GVT data • Envelope expansion after 1 year: • Full envelope expansion with no problems detected • Limited by elevator authority – larger tail required

  6. European Flight Test Safety Workshop, Sept 28-29th 2010, London, UK P1 = 559 cm P2 = 648 cm Second protoype 2 (P2) • Systems testbed • No intention of making high risk tests • Avionics + pressure cabin • 16% increased stabilizer span P1 = ~2.5kg Elevator mass balance Elevator hinges

  7. European Flight Test Safety Workshop, Sept 28-29th 2010, London, UK P2 Ground Vibration Test (GVT) • External flutter expert • GVT result: • Tested: 1 kg elevator mass balances = max 135 kts • Calculated: 4.5 kg elevator mass balances • Improvised retrofit for adjusting mass balance (1) Elevator horn was opened (2) Lead pellet/resin mixture poured into the horn (3) Horn sealed • No new GVT after retrofit; no new structure stress/strength recalculation

  8. European Flight Test Safety Workshop, Sept 28-29th 2010, London, UK P2 envelope • Data received per Telefax from flutter expert • Limit 297 kts with 4.5 kg elevator mass balances • Similar situation to P1 initial envelope – the limit was considered preliminary pending more data • Data accepted with no further questions Vc Vmo 270 Vd 1.25Vc 338 Vflutter_min 1.2Vd 406 Certification speeds P2 Vmax 297

  9. European Flight Test Safety Workshop, Sept 28-29th 2010, London, UK P2 status before the accident • Two months since first flight • 31 flight hours • Light nose boom vibration: 3-4 Hz @ 180-200 kts • Maximum recorded speed 277 kts • Plan for Nov 29th • Morning test flight • Afternoon demo flight

  10. European Flight Test Safety Workshop, Sept 28-29th 2010, London, UK Accident Flight Track

  11. European Flight Test Safety Workshop, Sept 28-29th 2010, London, UK P2 accident conditions • Impacted wings level and exactly on track • Tail parts 400 meters before impact • Elevator horns broken off elevator • Several symmetric damages and cracks on left and right side of stab/elevator • Unknown speed • No FDR; all recording media destroyed • No telemetry • BFU estimate: 240-270 kts

  12. European Flight Test Safety Workshop, Sept 28-29th 2010, London, UK P2 GVT data received 12.12.2006 Asymmetric damping curve F = Curve of elevator tip vibration against trim tab.

  13. European Flight Test Safety Workshop, Sept 28-29th 2010, London, UK P2 Speed Envelope? • min 20% flutter safety margin recommended by AC 23.629-1B • Only 5.4% safety margin between 297 and 313 kts Vc Vmo 270 Vd 1.25Vc 338 Vflutter_min 1.2Vd 406 Certification speeds 313 209 261 P2 speeds 297

  14. European Flight Test Safety Workshop, Sept 28-29th 2010, London, UK P1 and P3 findings after accident • P1 flight ops restarted after 2 ½ months • Loose mass balances discovered during a preflight inspection; repaired with bolts fixing mass balance to structure • P3 design changes • Met the “short field - long range” performance specification • Less balance mass in elevator horn; distributed mass balances along elevator leading edge • However, there still was a flutter problem...

  15. European Flight Test Safety Workshop, Sept 28-29th 2010, London, UK P3 GVT animation • Iterative process; envelope expansions; structural modifications; elevator horn eventually removed • July 2008: Envelope expansion to 41.000 ft and M.72

  16. European Flight Test Safety Workshop, Sept 28-29th 2010, London, UK Technical Conclusion • Flutter • Possible flutter cause(s): • Excessive speed? • Loose mass balance(s)? • Elevator/horn strength/stiffness? • But a flutter problem should not cause an accident?...

  17. European Flight Test Safety Workshop, Sept 28-29th 2010, London, UK Conclusion • Classical error chain Design/Manufacturing flaw(s) => Wrong limit => No envelope expansion • Main problem: Lack of COMMUNICATION: • The flutter problem was not communicated • Why?... • Quality • Time pressure

  18. European Flight Test Safety Workshop, Sept 28-29th 2010, London, UK Questions?

More Related