1 / 39

Mehdi Alimadadi, Samad Sheikhaei, Guy Lemieux , Shahriar Mirabbasi, William Dunford

Energy Recovery from High-frequency Clocks using DC-DC Converters. Mehdi Alimadadi, Samad Sheikhaei, Guy Lemieux , Shahriar Mirabbasi, William Dunford University of British Columbia, Canada Patrick Palmer University of Cambridge, UK. Problem. Clock power in high-performance CPUs.

lark
Télécharger la présentation

Mehdi Alimadadi, Samad Sheikhaei, Guy Lemieux , Shahriar Mirabbasi, William Dunford

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Energy Recovery from High-frequency Clocks using DC-DC Converters Mehdi Alimadadi, Samad Sheikhaei, Guy Lemieux, Shahriar Mirabbasi, William Dunford University of British Columbia, Canada Patrick Palmer University of Cambridge, UK

  2. Problem Clock power in high-performance CPUs • Cause • Charge big clock capacitor Cclk with energy • Discharge Cclk energy to GND (WASTE IT!!) • Repeat every clock cycle

  3. Primary Contribution of This Work • Primary contribution • Discharge Cclk using DC-DC converter instead of GND • Use converter to power useful load (Rload) • Integratedclock drivers with DC-DC converters • Net savings in power  Voltage feedback (for regulation) Useful Load

  4. Summary Results • Explore 3 main DC-DC power converter topologies • Buck converter our previous work [ ISSCC 2007 ] • Boost converter this paper [ ISVLSI 2008 ] • Buck-boost converter this paper [ ISVLSI 2008 ] • 90nm layouts, 3GHz operation, < 0.3mm2

  5. Background

  6. Background – Typical Clocking Architecture Bottom mesh Final H-tree Clock Source Level 3 Gaters & Final drivers Level 1 & Level 2 H-tree

  7. Background – Typical Clocking Architecture • Clock distribution • Majority of energy used by final drivers • Levels 1, 2 • H-trees • Tunable delays (CVDs) to eliminate skew • Low-swing, differential  low power, noise immunity • ~ 5W of power • Level 3 • Gaters reduce clock activity 50-85% (Power6) • Can’t eliminate all activity  still need a clock to compute • Final clock drivers • Full-rail swing tapered inverters drive hundreds latches, high power • H-tree with ends shorted by Mesh low skew, high power • ~15W to 40W of power

  8. Background –Reducing Clock Power • Clock distribution • Low-swing (differential) signals • Final drivers need full-rail • Resonant clocking (saves 80%) • Final drivers need square clock • Final clock drivers • Adiabatic switching • Low-performance, < 100MHz • Double-edge clocking • Feasible, but complex flip-flops, larger loads • Compatible with energy recovery in this paper

  9. Background – Switch Mode Power Supplies • Basic DC-DC converter topologies • Buck • Step down • 0 Vout  VDD • Boost • Step up • VDD Vout • Buck-boost • Negative step up/down • Vout  0

  10. Background – Switch Mode Power Supplies • DC-DC buck converter • CMOS inverter as power switches • Implementation of zero-voltage switching (ZVS) • Turn on NMOS when Vinv= 0 • Turn on PMOS when Vinv=Vdd

  11. Background ISSCC 2007 Design ZVS  delay circuit Integrated clock driver / power converter

  12. Integration of Clock and SMPS • CPU clock: 3GHz clock and large Cclk • SMPS: large Mp, Mndrive chain

  13. Integration of Clock and SMPS • Combine the driver circuits

  14. Key Concept: Energy Recycling • Benefits • Shared driver chain • Cclk added to SMPS • Red path • NMOS drains Cclkwastes charge! • Blue path • Delay NMOS turn-on recovers clock charge! • ZVS (zero voltage switching) in power electronics

  15. ZVS Detailed Operation • ZVS delay circuit D • Delay only rising edge of Vn • Implemented inside the clock chain

  16. ZVS Detailed Operation (Mode 1) • Mode 1 (0 < t < DTsw) • Mp is ON • Current builds up in the inductor • Cclk charges up D = Duty cycle Tsw = Switching period

  17. ZVS Detailed Operation (Mode 2) • Mode 2 (DTsw < t < DTsw+Tzvs) • Both power transistors are OFF • Inductor current discharges Cclk • Cclk charge is recycled to output load D = Duty cycle Tsw = Period Tzvs = ZVS delay

  18. ZVS Detailed Operation(Mode 3) • Mode 3 (DTsw+Tzvs < t < Tsw) • Mnturns ON when Vclk 0 • ZVS for Mn • Inductor current decreases linearly D = Duty cycle Tsw = Period Tzvs = ZVS delay

  19. Detailed Operation • ZVS delay circuit for Mn • Delay rising edge of Vn

  20. Detailed Operation • ZVS delay circuit for Mn • Falling edges of Vp and Vn are synchronized

  21. Simulation Voltages

  22. Simulation Currents

  23. Effective Efficiency • How to measure power efficiency after clock drivers are integrated with DC-DC converters ? • Converter gets “free energy” from clock • Effective efficiency: how efficient a regular (standalone) power converter must be to equal the efficiency of integrated clock/power converter Raw efficiency Effective efficiency

  24. Buck Converter – Simulation Results Open loop converter (no regulation) Higher efficiency at lowest duty cycle becauseonly a fixed amount of energy is available from Cclk

  25. ISSCC 2007 • 90nm test chip 1mm2, buck converter 0.27mm2

  26. Buck Converter – Chip Measurement vs. Simulation Results Chip Measurement Simulation (3GHz)

  27. ISVLSI 2008New Design 1 Boost Converter

  28. Boost Converter Basic operation Vclk provides power & timing 0th order result… Vout = D/(1-D)*Vdd

  29. Boost Converter

  30. Boost Converter – Simulation Results • Open loop converter (no regulation) • Higher efficiency at lowest duty cycle becauseonly a fixed amount of energy is available from Cclk

  31. ISVLSI 2008New Design 2 Buck-boost Converter

  32. Buck-boost Converter Basic operation Vclk provides power & timing 0th order result… Vout = -D2/(1-D)*Vdd

  33. Buck-boost Converter

  34. Buck-boost Converter Open loop converter (no regulation) Higher efficiency at lowest duty cycle becauseonly a fixed amount of energy is available from Cclk

  35. Results and Comparisons

  36. Summary Results • 90nm layouts, 3GHz operation, < 0.3mm2

  37. Comparative Results IBM Power6 100W@1V, 341mm2 Cclk = 13pF/mm2 Other work: fully on-chip DC-DC buck converter S. Abedinpour, B. Bakkaloglu, and S. Kiaei, "A Multi-Stage Interleaved Synchronous Buck Converterwith Integrated Output Filter in a 0.18µm SiGe Process," ISSCC 2006, pp. 356–357 27mm2, 45MHz 65% power efficiency This work 0.27, 0.26, 0.20 mm2, including 0.1mm2 inductor area, 3GHz Cclk 20pF, equiv to 1.6mm2 of Power6 area DC-DC converter adds 12.5% area overhead LC filter: 310pH inductor, 350pF capacitor L and C similar and dominate layout area  can stack to cut area in half Buck: 75 – 185% effective power efficiency (50% recovered) Boost: 25 – 110% effective power efficiency (20% recovered) Buck-boost: 20 – 66% effective power efficiency (30% recovered)

  38. Conclusion • Key concepts • High switching frequency saves area • Combined driverssaves area and switching loss • Recycled charge converter load discharges Cclk • ZVS delay circuit lower power loss • Limitations • Regulation needs variable duty cycle clock • May introduce additional clock jitter • Mostly suitable for edge-triggered blocks (no latches) • Future work • Lots of improvements to make!

  39. Thank you! Questions ?

More Related