1 / 16

Flipping Class: Assessing Differences and Sharing Experiences

Flipping Class: Assessing Differences and Sharing Experiences. Gerard Beenen California State University, Fullerton March 14, 2014 Assessment Conference XVIII. Getting past the hype. Background > Application> Analysis> Takeaways.

latika
Télécharger la présentation

Flipping Class: Assessing Differences and Sharing Experiences

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Flipping Class:Assessing Differences and Sharing Experiences Gerard Beenen California State University, Fullerton March 14, 2014 Assessment Conference XVIII

  2. Getting past the hype Background> Application> Analysis> Takeaways

  3. The flipped class model pushes traditional lecture content outside the class, and pulls content application into the class. Background> Application> Analysis> Takeaways

  4. Questions to consider • How effective is a flipped versus traditional version of the same management 340 organizational behavior course? • Are there student characteristics that predict more favorable outcomes for a flipped versus traditional course? • What experiences have you had (+/-) with flipping a course? Background> Application> Analysis> Takeaways

  5. A day in the life of a flipped class student Background> Application> Analysis> Takeaways

  6. Let’s go for a test drive • Example 1 • Excerpt from online module on emotions • Introductory content viewed outside of class • Example 2 • Excerpt from module on decision making • Content viewed outside of class, followed by in-class exercise Background> Application> Analysis> Takeaways

  7. ACME Surfboards • You’re evaluating manufacturing surfboards locally, centrally in the US, or in China. • Local, central and overseas production range from most to least expensive to manufacture. • What criteria are important? Define 3-4 criteria, and weight them in importance (e.g., allocate 100 points to your criteria). • Rate each option on a scale of 1-10, weighted by the importance of each criterion. Background> Application> Analysis> Takeaways

  8. Assessing learning outcomes • Assign discussion groups of 3-5 students. • How are they applying the material in the discussion groups? • Are all or only a few students in discussion? • What kinds of roles are emerging? • Groups used white board space to share their results with class. • Review outputs, identify themes, bring attention to creative solutions Background> Application> Analysis> Takeaways

  9. Background> Application> Analysis> Takeaways

  10. Comparing learning outcomes N=96. *p<.05. +p<.1. Negative relationship depicted in red. Background> Application> Analysis> Takeaways

  11. Quantitative SOQs (1 to 4 scale)Face-to-face vs. flipped format 3.71 3.61 3.45 Students generally preferred f2f over flipped. …but expectations matter! Are they expecting an online or f2f course? Background> Application> Analysis> Takeaways

  12. Qualitative SOQsFlipped format student comments Did well… • “Enjoyed flipped format…is extremely fast-paced…holds student accountable.” • “Group activities helped us better understand the material.” Could improve… • “Could improve the boring internet class. Flipped class is a flop. All online or all in- person.” • “I expected class lecture rather than online lecture. I feel like this is an online class.” Background> Application> Analysis> Takeaways

  13. What predicts interest in a flipped course? Variable • Took a flipped course (control) • Autonomous self-regulation • Big five personality • Kolb’s learning style • Performance goal/implicit theory Δ R2 .12** .08* .03 .02 .10+ N=94. **p<.01. +p<.1. Negative relationship depicted in red. Background> Application> Analysis> Takeaways

  14. Flipping Class (Mgmt 340) Background> Application> Analysis> Takeaways

  15. Conclusions • Worth trying if you have access to online content. • Pre-test content (e.g., with an online class) • Keep online lectures to <20 minutes • No clear evidence for better teaching outcomes. • Student expectations likely play a key role. • Potential person-situation fit issue for students • Autonomous motivation • Avoidance mindset (-) Background> Application> Analysis> Takeaways

  16. Questions? Background> Application> Analysis> Takeaways

More Related