1 / 34

Principles of word learning

Principles of word learning. Constraints on word learning. Gavagai. Quine 1960. Constraints on word learning. Gavagai: Dog Poodle Bone Barking Blue fur Isn‘t that a lovely day?. Constraints on word learning. The whole object constraint The mutual exclusivity constraint

laurel
Télécharger la présentation

Principles of word learning

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Principles of word learning

  2. Constraints on word learning Gavagai Quine 1960

  3. Constraints on word learning Gavagai: • Dog • Poodle • Bone • Barking • Blue fur • Isn‘t that a lovely day?

  4. Constraints on word learning • The whole object constraint • The mutual exclusivity constraint • The taxonomic constraint

  5. The whole object constraint New words are likely to refer to the whole object rather than ist parts, substance etc.

  6. The mutual exclusivity constraint An entity cannot have more than one name. The principle of contrast [Clark 1997]

  7. Don't take the red tray, take the chromium tray. Carey 1978

  8. Markman 1996

  9. Markman 1996

  10. Show me the boom. Prediction: Since children know the word fire truck, they will interpret the word ‚boom‘ as label for a noticable part of the fire truck.

  11. Show me the platform. Prediction: Since children don’t know the word microscope, they will interpret the word ‚platform‘ (which they also don‘t know) as label for a noticable part of the microscope.

  12. Results The results confirmed the prediction: In the familiar condition, children interpret the novel noun as a name for the salient part. In the unfamiliar condition, children interpret the novel noun as a name for the whole object. Markman 1996

  13. The taxonomic constraint Taxonomic relationship pig horse cow Thematic relationship pig –– mud horse –– stable cow –– milk

  14. The taxonomic constraint Young children pay more attention to thematic relationships than to taxonomic relations. However, in word learning they shift their attention from thematic to taxonomic relations. Markmann 1996

  15. The taxonomic constraint Target Taxonomic choice Thematic choice

  16. ADULT: I am going to show you something. See this? ADULT: Can you find another one?

  17. ADULT: I am going to show you a dax. See this? ADULT: Can you find another dax?

  18. Linguistic cues X-ing X-ed X-s has X-ed want to X the X a X that X those X-s big X

  19. That’s Zav. That’s a Zav. Subjects: 1;6 year olds Katz, Baker and Macnamara 1974

  20. Can you pick up Zav. Can you pick up a Zav. Katz, Baker and Macnamara 1974

  21. Social-pragmatic cues Determining the meaning of a novel word is often based on the child’s ability to understand the pragmatic situation and the adult’s communicative intention. [Akthar and Tomasello 1996]

  22. Social-pragmatic cues Let’s go find the toma. Subjects: 2;0 year olds

  23. Pick up the toma.

  24. Social-pragmatic cues Children understood the pragmatic situation [searching for the toma], which allowed them to infer the meaning of a novel word although the word was never used with reference to a particular object. [Akthar and Tomasello 1996]

  25. Conclusion • Cognitive principles/strategies that can facilitate word learning: • Cognitive constraints [whole object constraint, mutual exclusivity constraint, taxonomic constraint] • Linguistic cues [e.g. mass nouns vs. count nouns] • Social-pragmatic cues

More Related