1 / 11

NCTQ Teacher Prep Review: 2014-2016

NCTQ Teacher Prep Review: 2014-2016. Webinar August 18, 2014. Agenda. Strengthening teacher preparation Plans for providing feedback to programs Regional discussions with teacher educator leaders Q&A. Goal: All new teachers should achieve a high level of competence.

lavey
Télécharger la présentation

NCTQ Teacher Prep Review: 2014-2016

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. NCTQ Teacher Prep Review:2014-2016 Webinar August 18, 2014

  2. Agenda • Strengthening teacher preparation • Plans for providing feedback to programs • Regional discussions with teacher educator leaders • Q&A

  3. Goal: All new teachers should achieve a high level of competence • First year of teaching should not be trial-and-error trial-by-fire • Teacher preparation as the foundation of the teaching profession • Ensuring all teachers have achieved competence in necessary knowledge and skills • Auspices are not as important as results • Alternate routes into of the profession should be judged by the same criteria as traditional

  4. Standards: Assuring competence Overview of NCTQ standards • Accepting individuals with requisite academic strength • Ensuring that they know the subjects they will teach • Training and guidance in effective techniques (e.g., reading, classroom management) • Evidence of effectiveness and performance improvement Minimum core principles for assuring competent graduates We aim for productive dialogue about how to ensure all programs making these principles operational – and evidence needed to judge.

  5. Feedback to programs: Appeals • Last year: • 54 programs appealed • Corrected scores of 23 programs on our own • All told, 68 standard scores corrected

  6. More time to work together Moving next publication to 2016 provides opportunity for: • Discussion of standards and methodology • Dialogue on how best to collaborate on how to achieve mutually held goals • Strengthening teacher preparation programs – and making sure that changes get recognition

  7. Choice of programs Choice of standards

  8. Feedback to programs: 2014-6

  9. Feedback to programs: One-on-one briefings • Provide detailed findings about strengths and areas of improvement • Discussions will encompass evidence used and how we reached findings • Specific recommendations will be given on how to strengthen programs

  10. Regional discussions with teacher educator leaders • Bring state officials into discussion • NCTQ to explain standards and methodologies in greater detail • Opportunity for teacher educators to ask questions and offer feedback • Hear from programs that perform well in key areas Let us know if you would like to work with us to put such a meeting together in your state.

  11. Q&A

More Related