1 / 23

Workshop on WFD Article 8 reporting tools and WISE GIS

Workshop on WFD Article 8 reporting tools and WISE GIS. Information needs – links between WFD and Eionet, and how data flows will be further facilitated Steve Nixon, WRc. Presentation. Water Framework Directive Reporting Eionet-Water WISE-SOE Streamlining compliance and SOE data flows.

lavey
Télécharger la présentation

Workshop on WFD Article 8 reporting tools and WISE GIS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Workshop on WFD Article 8 reporting tools and WISE GIS Information needs – links between WFD and Eionet, and how data flows will be further facilitated Steve Nixon, WRc

  2. Presentation • Water Framework Directive Reporting • Eionet-Water • WISE-SOE • Streamlining compliance and SOE data flows

  3. EEA management Board Steering Coordination Group/Water directors EEA EIONET/NFPs Steering Group (DG Env, JRC, Eurostat, EEA) WISE technical group(DG Env, JRC, Eurostat, EEA & experts) Working Group D Reportingchair DG Env WISE-GISworkshop NRCs for water and EIONET water Workshop Drafting Group Compliance Chair Dg Env EEA and WFD communities Drafting Group SOE/Trends Chair EEA

  4. Commission requires information to check compliance with the relevant EU legislation It requires information enabling it to: • Ensure data are plausible • Ensure data are consistent • Conduct cross-references and cross-checks on data (especially in International River Basins) • Ensure the Directive has been implemented in a harmonised way.

  5. Commission also requires • information on State of the Environment and trends (SoE), and on implementation of measures to allow it • to determine whether existing policies are adequately protecting the environment and • to identify where further measures may be needed.

  6. Reporting under WFD • Article 3 - due 22 June 2004 • Article 5 - due 22 March 2005 • e.g. Characteristics of River Basin Districts (identification of water bodies) • Article 8 - due 22 March 2007 • Summary report on monitoring networks operational end 2006

  7. Eionet- water • Agreed priority data flows with annual update on rivers, lakes, groundwaters, transitional, coastal and marine waters • Nutrients (nitrate in groundwater, chlorophyll in marine waters) • Organic pollution indicators • Hazardous substances in water (and in marine biota) • Water quantity • Using Reportnet tools • Validated data and information available through EEA web page

  8. Eionet-Water River Stations

  9. CSI 20 Nutrients in freshwater Are nutrients and organic pollution decreasing in our freshwater? Assessment of trends at the country level – Orthophosphate 1992 to 2002

  10. EIONET-water adaptation to WFD WFD –requirements - Charact. for RBMD /Water bodies (spatial represent.)- aggregated information on type specific quality classes - surveillance and operational monitoring  adapt networks EIONET-water- quality data- HS in biota- Quantity- (Biological)- (Emissions) Reportnet,CDR,DD Stratification stations representative per MS Conceptual adaptation:-SOE sites to represent River basin /water body - SOE sites to enable type specific assessment Technical- use of Reportnet tools in WISE/ inspire compatible- WISE – GIS Networksrestructured for 2006/7

  11. Objective of SOER-drafting group • To progressively develop and implement a streamlined flow of data and information • To provide a shared pool of common and timely data and information on the state of, and pressures on, Europe’s water (SOE_WISE) • To meets the needs of all those organisations requiring to report and make assessments at a European level.

  12. The challenge • Integration into WISE with streamlined reporting e.g. between Articles 3, 5, 8 and SOE-data flow • Selecting good monitoring sites for the Eionet-water/SOE-reporting • Representative for water body/group of WB • Allowing type specific assessments • Keep time series from the Eionet water data set as far as possible

  13. EEA Assessments • State of, and trends, in the water environment – Core set and other indicators • Broader assessments of specific water related issues e.g. eutrophication • Assessment of impact of specific sectors (e.g. agriculture) on water, perhaps based on conceptual models such as water accounts • EEA aims to make these assessments more representative (of each catchment and subcatchment within each river basin district in a country)

  14. Criteria for the monitoring sites to be used for EEA/SOE assessments Representative monitoring sites covering • All water categories (groundwater, rivers, lakes, transitional, coastal and marine waters) • All types of water body • Complete range of statuses present • All sizes • All types of pressure • Different sites for different quality elements • Sites may be from surveillance, operational and other monitoring networks • Annual monitoring may be undertaken at the sites for some of the determinands

  15. Rivers: Difference in numbers of surveillance monitoring and Eionet-Water sites

  16. Reporting of SOE data and information • Data will in principle be reported at the site level • Site level data may then be aggregated spatially and/or temporally in ways appropriate for the assessment being undertaken e.g. at water body level • Reporting at site level will ensure maximum flexibility in how data are subsequently compiled, aggregated and analysed by the EEA • Number of different relationships between monitoring stations, quality elements measured at the station and the water bodies they represent • Need supportive and interpretative information on how sites relate to water bodies and groups of water bodies

  17. Options for the treatment of data before reporting • Vary between quality elements and reporting sheets • Annual/seasonal aggregation of data for each monitoring site with aggregation of data from the sub-sites associated with the site • Depth average for deep lakes (with surface values) • Width averaged for rivers (with certain conditions) • Countries can still report sub-sites if they so-wish (e.g. Danube) • Annual/seasonal aggregation of data for each monitoring site with NO aggregation of data from sub-sites • Disaggregated, individual sample data for each monitoring site and sub-site

  18. Draft Reporting Sheets for SOE data and information • 16 drafted • 12 of those currently in, or partially in, Eionet-Water and Data Dictionary • 4 on biological quality elements not in Data Dictionary • 16 require future development • Sheets for marine waters to be discussed with EMMA group

  19. Streamlining of reporting - Geographic information Monitoring site • Links to compliance reporting sheets on monitoring (Article 8) • Unique monitoring site code linked to unique water body code and unique codes for each water body within a group • Need not be reported again for SOE • However will be required for those sites included in SOER but not in WFD monitoring networks Article 5 • All water bodies • Unique code • Coordinates of centroid of water body • Shape/GML files of the water bodies

  20. Further process for reporting sheets • Final draft by beginning 2007 • All sheets drafted so far • Proposal for further development and list of issues to be clarified for undeveloped sheets • First draft of agreed sheets (basic set around old Eionet-water data flow) for German water Directors and summer EEA MB meetings •  May meeting of NFPs and strategic coordination group • Further development of technical implementation in WISE together with realisation Article 8 reporting until September 2007 • Task 4 and 5 • Final guidance for WD and EEA MB in Nov. 2007

  21. Streamlining of reporting Process • Article 8 submissions will be via ReportNet • Amend ReportNet processes (voluntary) to support Compliance reporting (obligatory) • Amend workflow to include compliance checking step. • Increased validation requirements • Improved reports functionality • Creation of European dataset

  22. Thank you for your attention!!

More Related