1 / 20

Leadership Network 11/27

Leadership Network 11/27. Monitoring and Communication “Teams need to receive feedback on the effectiveness of their collaboration and the way in which they are using data – both cause and effect – to improve teaching, learning, and leadership” (McNulty & Besser , 2011). Announcements.

lawson
Télécharger la présentation

Leadership Network 11/27

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Leadership Network 11/27 Monitoring and Communication “Teams need to receive feedback on the effectiveness of their collaboration and the way in which they are using data – both cause and effect – to improve teaching, learning, and leadership” (McNulty & Besser, 2011).

  2. Announcements • OLAC Action Forum December 5th • Webinars with Brian McNulty • TBT trainings in February • Leadership Network - February 26th

  3. Communication • Do all principals and teachers know your goals and strategies? • Do they know “why?” • How do you communicate? Protocols? • Strengths • Challenges

  4. Tedtalks • www.ted.com • “Simon Sinek” • “How great leaders inspire action”

  5. Thoughts?

  6. Leaders Make It Happen – Ch. 8 • As you are reading, mark a: • for the main point(s) • for supporting points • for questions

  7. Main Points? Questions?

  8. The DLT, BLT, TBT Connection

  9. Lakewood City SchoolsOhio Improvement Process • Lakewood City Schools have been involved for five years • Established District Leadership Teams and Building Leadership Teams in 2008-2009 • Establishment of TBTs became district goal for 2010-2011

  10. As TBTs developed… All meetings re-purposed • TBTs – instead of team meetings on topics or universal screening data; now 5 step process • BLTs – Varied building topics to TBT report outs • DLT – small district to every principal and one teacher rep per building, BLT report outs • DLT Steering – development of DLT agenda

  11. Lakewood City SchoolsOur Repurposed Structure

  12. Lakewood City Schools…Tweaking the Process for Communication • TBTs – established common protocol for all • BLTs – review TBT protocols within meetings; follow question protocol • DLT – follows 5-step process; no BLT share out from all; data review and group processing • DLT Steering – follows 5-step process; reviews analysis from DLT and makes decisions

  13. Lakewood City SchoolsMonitoring

  14. Lakewood City SchoolsMonitoring • Central office participation • BLT meetings • PD early release • Superintendent data meetings • OPES

  15. In Conclusion… • Based on the data and discussions, is there any grade level, building or TBT that DLT would like to get more information from in Math or Reading? • Do we think that our Adult Implementation Indicators support monitoring our District Improvement Plan? • Is there other data that would be more useful to monitor student achievement? • How might we speculate our Benchmarking Data correlates to our District Value-Added and Performance Index results? • How can DLT find high yield instructional strategies that are working in areas where there is significant growth in student achievement? • In your discussions were there any curriculum or instructional changes at a particular grade level where you saw gains in student achievement?

  16. Learn from: • Math : Lincoln 4th, Hayes 5th, Harding 7, Roosevelt • Reading: Harrison 4th, Hayes 5th, Garfield 6th • HS English dept. • LHS science dept. • Adult implementation Indicators: • Fine in plan with this caveat: implement as described and possibly add instructional strategies from walk-through protocol • Add longitudinal data • Student interview may not support monitoring plan • Student performance indicators: • Fine with collection – need to use better across levels • RIMP data • RtII data • Add longitudinal data • Correlation: • There is a direct correlation - >.6 • With change to DIBELS composite, is there a greater correlation? • Instructional strategies: • BLTs use TBT protocols to identify strategies examine with walk-through data • Report to DLT and DLT steering • Drill to building level to examine strategies – are there differences by level? • How have reading edge students performed? • We need to pick particular strategies that everyone will use to see if they increase growth

  17. Lakewood City Schools…Improving, but will continue to tweak • 5 straight years of “Above expected growth” • 4 straight years of increases in Performance Index • Moved from “Medium Support” to “Low Support” per improvement in AYP • Questions, Comments, Advice?

More Related