1 / 12

2009 Seminar for the Appointed Actuary Friday September 18, 2009 MATERIALITY Colloque pour l’actuaire désigné 2009

Canadian Institute of Actuaries. L’Institut canadien des actuaires. 2009 Seminar for the Appointed Actuary Friday September 18, 2009 MATERIALITY Colloque pour l’actuaire désigné 2009. SOP 1340.03 Materiality

lazaro
Télécharger la présentation

2009 Seminar for the Appointed Actuary Friday September 18, 2009 MATERIALITY Colloque pour l’actuaire désigné 2009

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Canadian Institute of Actuaries L’Institutcanadien des actuaires 2009 Seminar for the Appointed Actuary Friday September 18, 2009 MATERIALITY Colloque pour l’actuaire désigné 2009

  2. SOP 1340.03 Materiality “Material has its ordinary meaning, but judged from the point of view of a user, having regard for the purpose of the work.” “Thus, an omisson, understatement, or overstatment is material if the actuary expects it materially to affect either the user’s decision making or the user’s reasonable expectations.” 2009 Seminar for the Appointed Actuary Colloque pour l’actuairedésigné 2009 Canadian Institute of Actuaries Standards of Practice Page 1

  3. Reflecting Upon Materiality : User is Key Intended User : includes principal Unintended User: although not responsible for, may be found to retain some responsibility to assure that a report is not misused or misapplied. The actuary would report the purpose of the work as precisely as possible so that any user is warned of the risk of using the work for a different purpose with a more rigorous standard of materiality. Summary: the actuary who prepares the work is expected to take reasonable steps to ensure that the work does not mislead the intended users of the work. 2009 Seminar for the Appointed Actuary Colloque pour l’actuairedésigné 2009 Page 2

  4. Determination of Materiality Level Different practices Some have a separate materiality for data (small) than for the organization in total. Most common, one single materiality level. Should be reasonably stable (not vary greatly from year to year or valuation to valuation) 2009 Seminar for the Appointed Actuary Colloque pour l’actuairedésigné 2009 Page 3

  5. Materiality Considerations Materiality level should be related to purpose and intended users of work Regulatory/solvency : statutory surplus/solvency benchmark ratio Appraisal work : net worth/net income/eps DCAT : less rigorous than valuation work Financial Statement work : net income/net capital 2009 Seminar for the Appointed Actuary Colloque pour l’actuairedésigné 2009 Page 4

  6. Materiality Considerations 2009 Seminar for the Appointed Actuary Colloque pour l’actuairedésigné 2009 • Materiality level expected to vary according to other characteristics of entity • Size of entity • Entity’s access to capital • Stage of organizational life cycle • Type of business • Net retention Page 5

  7. Materiality Considerations 2009 Seminar for the Appointed Actuary Colloque pour l’actuairedésigné 2009 • Materiality level for work involving a threshold expected to become more rigorous as the entity approaches that threshold. Page 6

  8. Accounting vs Actuarial Materiality Some would argue that, at least in theory, the materiality level selected by the actuary would normally be close to that selected by the accountant or auditor. Communication regarding materiality is expected between the actuary and the auditor. 2009 Seminar for the Appointed Actuary Colloque pour l’actuairedésigné 2009 Page 7

  9. Communication and Disclosure Main factor underlying the selection of a materiality level has been the impact on the user. Actuary would consider some disclosure regarding the materiality level within the actuarial work product. Must take into account the complexity of the concept of materiality, the potential importance of the concept to the user, as well as the sophistication of the user who will be receiving the work product. 2009 Seminar for the Appointed Actuary Colloque pour l’actuairedésigné 2009 Page 8

  10. Materiality In Practice : AAR 0.5% of gross policy liabilities 1% of gross unpaid claims 5% of net unpaid claims 10% of net income 0.75%-1% of assets 2.5% of surplus or equity 2.5% of net earned premiums 1% net unearned premiums Same as auditor 2009 Seminar for the Appointed Actuary Colloque pour l’actuairedésigné 2009 Page 9

  11. Materiality In Practice : DCAT 2009 Seminar for the Appointed Actuary Colloque pour l’actuairedésigné 2009 • 2%-5.5% of surplus or equity • Sum of 2.5% of surplus and 5% of excess of assets • Same as policy liability evaluation Page 10

  12. Questions ? 2009 Seminar for the Appointed Actuary Colloque pour l’actuairedésigné 2009 Page 11

More Related