1 / 13

CHOOSING THE EXCHANGE Sonera viewpoint Jari Jaakkola

CHOOSING THE EXCHANGE Sonera viewpoint Jari Jaakkola. CHOOSING THE EXCHANGE Company track record. Listed on 11/98 in Helsinki with a market capitalisation of 5.5 billion euros Free float 22.2%, Finnish Government largest shareholder

leanne
Télécharger la présentation

CHOOSING THE EXCHANGE Sonera viewpoint Jari Jaakkola

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CHOOSING THE EXCHANGE Sonera viewpoint Jari Jaakkola

  2. CHOOSING THE EXCHANGECompany track record • Listed on 11/98 in Helsinki with a market capitalisation of 5.5 billion euros • Free float 22.2%, Finnish Government largest shareholder • Secondary offering on 10/99, free float to 42%, market cap 17.1 billion euros • SEC registration, NASDAQ listing 10/99 • Current free float 47%, market cap 32 billion euros

  3. CHOOSING THE EXCHANGEKey considerations • Company strategy • Processes • Investor requirements • Analysis: benefits vs. costs • Market place developments

  4. CHOOSING THE EXCHANGESonera - aiming to be global • Helsinki: natural first step • Global service businesses launched in the autumn 1999 • In fast moving IT- and telecommunications business - US a relevant market • Profile raised - high visibility sought

  5. CHOOSING THE EXCHANGENYSE • Offers recognition, prestige • Market specialist to execute trades • Specialist may mitigate volatility in certain instances • Reliance on one specialist can be problematic • More stringent listing requirements • More expensive to obtain and mainatin listing • If desired by issues, more difficult to delist securities than on NASDAQ

  6. CHOOSING THE EXCHANGENASDAQ • Offers substantially the same liquidity as NYSE for comparable companies • Offers substantial number of market makers enhancing effective execution • Never halts for order imbalances • Less restrictive requirements for listing • Less expensive to obtain and maintain listing • Potentially increased volatility

  7. Choosing the ExchangeNYSE vs. NASDAQ • NYSE • NASDAQ • Total Market Capitalisation (US$ bn)1 • Number of Listed Companies1 • Top 5 Market Capitalisations1 • Average Market Value • per Company (US$ bn)1 • Average Daily Volume (Share)2 • Composite Index • Performance 1998 • 1999 YTD3 • 10,900 • 3,114 • General Electric ($334 bn) • Wal-Mart ($181 bn) • Exxon ($178 bn) • Merck ($176 bn) • Pfizer ($162 bn) • 3.5 • 771m • 31.2% • 16.4% • 1.2% • 2,600 • 5,068 • Microsoft ($346 bn) • Intel ($198 bn) • Cisco Systems ($147 bn) • MCI Worldcom ($132 bn) • Dell Computer ($93 bn) • 0.51 • 918m • 22.6% • 39.6% • 8.3% 1997 1 As of 31 December 1998 2 January to December 1998 3 As of 8th March 1999

  8. CHOOSING THE EXCHANGENYSE vs. NASDAQ • Both could have done the job... • Sonera profile suited well to NASDAQ • First 200 days: • Liquidity ok, US institutions still trade a lot in Helsinki • 15 000 retail investors

  9. Sonera´s Ownership Breakdown Domestic institutional and retail In State ownership, Government is seeking authorization to sell 13% 34% 34% Foreign investors 19% In State ownership, authorization to sell Finnish State 53% Private Shareholders 47%

  10. Global Shareholder Report Investment Orientation Comparison 41% 41% 40% 36% 35% 29% % of Shares Identified 24% 19% 14% 11% 9% 1% Growth Value GARP Index IPO April 1999 March 2000

  11. Sonera Share Price in HEX

  12. CHOOSING THE EXCHANGEFuture requirements and trends • Liquidity, liquidity and liquidity • Multiple listings in one time zone not likely • A global company needs to consider 3 zones • Will orders flow to the next zone?

  13. CHOOSING THE EXCHANGEFuture wishes • One set of requirements and reporting • Global concept, local presence • Different market places for different companies

More Related