1 / 9

A506: Chapters 1-2

A506: Chapters 1-2. Dr. Eric Schansberg Indiana University Southeast. Preface. Two key, intro remarks:

leda
Télécharger la présentation

A506: Chapters 1-2

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. A506: Chapters 1-2 Dr. Eric Schansberg Indiana University Southeast

  2. Preface Two key, intro remarks: 1.) p. xvii’s focus on “thinking through the complex problems of getting incentives right…as much profit to be made from creatively structuring incentives as…from creatively developing products for sale” 2.) p. xix-xx’s value of (further) developing skills in creative and critical thinking; modeling as a useful abstraction from (distracting) detail! -p. 14: “Theory helps us generate insights that transcend the special cases [which] will quickly fade into history.”

  3. Mkt. vs. Govt; Property Rights -p. 11a’s mkt vs. govt—who decides? -p. 11b’s info and motives—within each (for mkts, see: “I Pencil” on-line R #1.1) -p. 17-20’s individual p.r.’s—and environment in which markets operate -import of p.r.’s philosophically and practically -p.r.’s limited socially and legally -p.r.’s exchanged -p. 25-31’s communal/public p.r.’s -efficient enough… -avoid: without scarcity -overcome: with accountability, smaller and more homogeneous groups, objective standards -if not, “tragedy of the commons” (Perspective 2)—with an intro to ch. 5’s externalities (p. 28-29’s pollution) in absence of p.r.’s  a missing app. to p.r.’s (or not)—real or perceived—within the workplace…

  4. Ch. 1’s assume desire to better one’s life (ch. 2’s U-max)—but subject to constraints -choices (constrained, given “scarcity”) given trade-offs and B vs. C; op. costs defined -inexact given info limits/problems -E(B) vs. E(C) -often subjective based on T&P -other assumptions: -some free will/choice (if not, uninteresting; but degrees of…) -ordinal vs. cardinal U—with transitivity in preferences -monotonicity: more is better (“econ good” vs. econ bad or satiation) -rationality (defined) with p. 53-54’s caveats -not mistakes (info; expectations) -not looking (much) at motives: self-interested vs. selfish -subjective  benefit/cost and changes in either: change incentives and may change behavior

  5. Production PossibilitiesFrontier/Curve -linear (p. 45) or non-linear (if DMR in production) -inside, outside, on constraint—given resources, technology, and institutions -shift constraint out/in (p. 46) -micro/macro—and esp. on latter, govt vs. mkt

  6. Chapter 1, Part B  all introduced; developed later…  at the least, note: importance of non-$$ (psych/soc—moreso in A508) issues/approaches

  7. Chapter 2, Part B -group behavior, but stemming from individuals -through mkts. and within firms  how/when successful? -theories: common/public interest vs. economics/individual

  8. but smaller groups = more mgmt…  surprising worker incentives for “tough” boss/mgmt or other monitoring—to deal with P.D. -w vs. MRPL (vs. not—skim; more later) -for each individual vs. (and) in general (see: P.D.; cartels) -balance: flex as efficient vs. undisciplined -can be morale problem either way; “optimal shirking”—MB vs. MC, vs. too much/little -w/ app. to tech and ability/need to “snoop” (on-line reading 2.2)  who’s a manager vs. managed in our class? groups at work?  groups (effective or not) in the classroom?

  9. “public goods” -defined (p. 58; vs. publicly-provided goods; vs. “private” goods) -non-rival (not in book) and non-exclusive in consumption (defined); p.r.’s (revisited)  free-rider problem—increases as… -examples in text -other examples…  potential for govt failure/struggle in response to mkt struggle  w/ app. to workplace (again, related to p.r.’s problems)…

More Related