1 / 18

Optimal Testing of Digital Microfluidic Biochips: A Multiple Traveling Salesman Problem

Optimal Testing of Digital Microfluidic Biochips: A Multiple Traveling Salesman Problem. R. Garfinkel 1 , I.I. Măndoiu 2 , B. Paşaniuc 2 and A. Zelikovsky 3. 1 Operations and Information Management, University of Connecticut 2 Computer Science and Engineering, University of Connecticut

lei
Télécharger la présentation

Optimal Testing of Digital Microfluidic Biochips: A Multiple Traveling Salesman Problem

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Optimal Testing of Digital Microfluidic Biochips: A Multiple Traveling Salesman Problem R. Garfinkel1, I.I. Măndoiu2, B. Paşaniuc2 and A. Zelikovsky3 1Operations and Information Management, University of Connecticut 2Computer Science and Engineering, University of Connecticut 3Computer Science, Georgia State University

  2. Outline • Introduction • Problem definition • ILP Formulation • Bounds and Heuristic • Experimental results • Conclusions

  3. Introduction • Lab-on-chip • Systems for performing biomedical analyses of very small quantities of liquids • Advantages • Fast reaction times • Low-cost, portable and disposable • Compactness massive parallelization high-throughput • 2 Types: • Continuous-flow: enclosed, interconnecting, micron-dimension channels • Digital: discrete droplets of fluid across the surface of an array of electrodes.

  4. Digital Microfluidic Biochips I/O I/O Cell [Su&Chakrabarty 06] [Srinivasan et al. 04] • Electrodes typically arranged in rectangular grid • Droplets moved by applying voltage to adjacent cell • Can be used for analyses of DNA, proteins, metabolites…

  5. Optimization Challenges • Module placement • Assay operations (mixing, amplification, etc.) can be mapped to overlapping areas of the chip if performed at different times • Droplet routing • When multiple droplets are routed simultaneously must prevent accidental droplet merging or interference • Testing • High electrode failure rate, but can re-configure around • Performed both after manufacturing and concurrent with chip operation • Main objective is minimization of completion time

  6. Concurrent Testing Problem • GIVEN: • Input/Output cells • Position of obstacles (cells in use by ongoing reactions) • FIND: • Trajectories for test droplets such that • Every non-blocked cell is visited by at least one test droplet • Droplet trajectories meet non-merging and non-interference constraints • Completion time is minimized Defect model: test droplet gets stuck at defective electrode

  7. Concurrent Testing Problem • [Su et al. 04] ILP-based solution for single test droplet case & heuristic for multiple input-output pairs with single test droplet/pair • Our problem formulation allows an unbounded number of droplets out of   each input cell • additional droplets can be used at no extra cost • completion time can be reduced substantially by splitting the work among multiple droplets • however, too many droplets may interfere with each other • Test problem for multiple droplets is NP-hard by reduction from the Hamiltonian path problem in grid graphs [Itai et. al. 82] • we seek approximation algorithms and heuristics with good practical performance

  8. Merging region • Set of cells to be kept empty when (i,j) is occupied by a droplet • Merging region:

  9. Interference region • Set of cells to be kept empty when a droplet moves away from (i,j) • Interference region:

  10. ILP formulation • 0/1 variable for each pair of neighbor cells: • is set to 1 iff a droplet that occupies cell (i,j) at time t-1 occupies cell (k,l) at time t i: k: j: l: Time t-1: Time t:

  11. ILP Formulation for Unconstrained Number of Droplets • Each cell (i,j) visited at least once: • Droplet conservation: • No droplet merging: • No droplet interference: • Minimize completion time:

  12. Special Case • NxN Chip • I/O cells in Opposite Corners • No Obstacles •  Single droplet solution needs N2 cycles

  13. Stripe Algorithm with N/3 Droplets Completion time:

  14. Lower Bound Lemma 1: Completion time is at least when k droplets are used Proof: In each cycle, each of the k droplets places 1 dollar in current cell  3k(k-1)/2 dollars paid waiting to depart  1 dollar in each cell  k dollars in each diagonal 3k(k-1)/2 dollars paid waiting for last droplet

  15. Approximation guarantee Lemma 2: Completion time for any #droplets is at least Proof: Minimum for is achieved when Theorem: Stripe algorithm with N/3 droplets has approximation factor of

  16. Stripe Algorithm with Obstacles of width ≤ Q • Divide array into vertical stripes of width Q+1 • Use one droplet per stripe • All droplets visit cells in assigned stripes in parallel • In case of interference droplet on left stripe waits for droplet in right stripe

  17. Results for 120x120 Chip, 2x2 Obstacles ~20x decrease in completion time by using multiple droplets

  18. Conclusions • Presented ILP formulation, approximation algorithm and heuristic for microfluidic biochip testing problem • Combinatorial optimization techniques can yield significant improvements

More Related