1 / 10

Comparison Quickbird & IKONOS

Ç UKUROVA. I NTA. Comparison Quickbird & IKONOS . Collection capabilities Geometric resolution. Space Systems, Inc. Swathwidth and strip length. IKONOS: 11 km swathwidth X (up to) 1,000 km strip length = 11,000 sq km Quickbird: 16.5 km swathwidth X up to 165 km strip length = 2,725 sq km.

leilani-john
Télécharger la présentation

Comparison Quickbird & IKONOS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ÇUKUROVA INTA ComparisonQuickbird & IKONOS Collection capabilities Geometric resolution Space Systems, Inc.

  2. Swathwidth and strip length IKONOS: 11 km swathwidth X (up to) 1,000 km strip length = 11,000 sq km Quickbird: 16.5 km swathwidth X up to 165 km strip length = 2,725 sq km

  3. Revisit frequency • IKONOS revisits area every 2.75 days • Quickbird revisits area every 4.0 days • at 30° latitude • max. 30° obliquity

  4. Case (revisit frequency) • Customer needs a high-res multispectral image from May of parcels in Egypt . • IKONOS can do 11/12 acquisition attempts in May. • Quickbird can do 7/8 acquisition attempts • Critical for cloudy areas Maximum obliquity of 30° at 30° latitude And… IKONOS can collect 4 – 5 times more area per opportunity.

  5. Maneuver capability1 IKONOS superior compared to Quickbird

  6. Maneuver capability2 And… Quickbrid, at a lower orbit altitude than IKONOS, needs to maneuver thru a greater angle for the same target to target (see ‘X’) = Additional 20% loss due to greater maneuver angles at lower altitude X X X X X * Assumes: 20 km long AOI’s, spaced +/- 250km cross track (60 deg slew for QB, 40 deg for IKONOS)

  7. IKONOS Quickbird Access Time to AOI Access time over area • IKONOS has longer access time over an area than Quickbird • Due to higher orbit altitude • Enabling large area collections

  8. IKONOS has 4X the AOI Collection Capability as Quickbird on Any Given Pass Average Pass 4X Scan 1 Scan 2 IKONOS 104 km Long x 49.6 wide 5154 Unique sq km QUICKBIRD 36 x 36 km 1340 Unique sq km Scan 1 Scan 2 Scan 3 Scan 4 This Results from: Higher Orbital Altitude Longer Access time Greater Agility Bi Directional Scanning Higher Imaging Rate and More Frequent Revisit (45%): >5X long term AOI Collection Wider Swath is Only a Small Part of the Collection Capability Equation

  9. (smart) Tasking of the satellite • Collection schedule can be changed up to 10 minutes before the pass • Weather changes on METEOSAT / NOAA imagery • inserting rush orders This greatly improves collection efficiency. Also: • Customer operations 24 hrs a day, 7 days a week available • True rush delivery: rush collection, FTP

  10. Conclusions • The total collection capabilities of IKONOS are better than Quickbird’s. • IKONOS in all 4 satellite related factors (revisit frequency, access time over area and maneuver capability). • The IKONOS satellite is operated more efficiently, due to the use of ROC’s (at strategic locations over the globe). • The (average) delivery time of IKONOS imagery is shorter and more reliable. • In particular in the ROC’s regions.

More Related