WTO and India-S. Africa Relations Convergence and Divergence

1. WTO and India-S. Africa Relations Convergence and Divergence By Pradeep S Mehta Secretary General, CUTS International, India www.cuts-international.org

2. India and South Africa • Economic and Trade Policy • Economic and Trade Relations • Respective Positions in WTO • Current Initiatives Within and Outside WTO • Future Scenario www.cuts-international.org

3. Economic and Trade Policy Policy-Related • Practiced import-substitution strategy till 1990 • Embarked on to comprehensive trade and economic policy reforms in early 1990s • Multilateralism as their first priority but negotiating a few FTAs simultaneously www.cuts-international.org

4. Economic and Trade Policy (Contd.) Economic Indicators www.cuts-international.org

5. Economic and Trade Relations • Strong cultural and social ties but weak economic and trade relations • S. Africa’s exports to India: 6-7% of total exports • India’s exports to S. Africa: Approx. 1% of total exports www.cuts-international.org

6. India and S.Africa: Positions in WTO Background • Both are founder members of WTO • Both are key regional players • Being a ‘developed’ developing country S. Africa identifies its interests more with developed nations • India prefers to adopt a more orthodox line in negotiations www.cuts-international.org

7. India and S. Africa: Positions in WTO On Major WTO Issues: Commonality • Agriculture: Being the architects of G-20 alliance; hold common position against North • TRIPs and Public Health: Both played a crucial role in brokering the deal at Doha • Bring effective disciplines on the use of trade remedy instruments www.cuts-international.org

8. India and S. Africa: Positions in WTO On Major WTO Issues: Divergence • On “New Round”: S.Africa supported New Round consisting of a wider negotiating agenda; India opposed till the end at Doha • Singapore Issues: S. Africa favours a modified less ambitious and carefully defined Agenda; India strongly opposes any negotiations www.cuts-international.org

9. India and S.Africa: Positions in WTO On Negotiating Strategy: S.Africa • Holds a more flexible approach • Priority to trade interests over political diplomacy • Negotiate outcomes favourable to economic development in general and to S.Africa in particular • Positions in Africa Group awkward and ambiguous www.cuts-international.org

10. India and S.Africa: Positions in WTO (Contd.) On Negotiating Strategy: India • Normally holds a hardline stance • Political diplomacy gets precedence over trade interests • Often sacrifices own trading interests for larger political gain • Go along well with its regional partners and other developing nations www.cuts-international.org

11. Current Initiatives: In and Outside the WTO S. Africa:Major Shift from Doha • At Doha, sided with developed countries on the new round and new issues; at Cancun went along with developing countries • Active member of G-20 at Cancun but did not join LMG at Doha www.cuts-international.org

12. Current Initiatives: In and Outside the WTO (Contd.) • Working to strengthen the IBSA group that includes India and Brazil • Supported the demand of four W African countries on cotton subsidy • Prioritised eleven “strategic partner” countries outside Africa; India is one of them www.cuts-international.org

13. Current Initiatives: In and Outside the WTO (Contd.) India: Holding on from Doha • Opposed “New Issues” at Cancun • Led G-20 alliance along with Brazil and South Africa • Working to further consolidate G-20 positions in post-Cancun era • Working towards enhancing South-South trade – negotiating FTAs with ASEAN, S.Africa, IBSA, Mercosur and SAARC www.cuts-international.org

14. Emerging Future Scenario • No major breakthrough after Cancun • Negotiating positions on agriculture are still polarised • G-20 has emerged as a third axis on the global trading landscape along with US and EU • Both Northern and Southern countries are on FTAs spree www.cuts-international.org

15. Emerging Future Scenario (Contd.) • Initiatives from within South and from WTO to enhance South-South trade • EU will have new Trade Commissioner by year end • USA may have new administration after election • India may also have new government but positions unlikely to change www.cuts-international.org

16. India and S.Africa: What Should be their Response? Enhancing South-South Trade: Capitalise on G-20 Alliance • Accounts for only 10% of global trade • Means to reduce dependence on North • Increase diversification of Southern exports beyond primary commodities • A better bargaining strength in trade negotiations www.cuts-international.org

17. India and S.Africa: What Should be their Response? (Contd.) Synergy with Smaller Regional Partners • Demonstrated at Cancun; it should be continued • To pursue a broader Southern alliance • Smaller countries are vulnerable to “arm-twisting” and sops offered by rich countries www.cuts-international.org

18. India and S. Africa: What Should be Their Response? (Contd.) Challenges/Opportunities from Cancun • Developing countries showed a new kind of solidarity at Cancun – How to sustain it? • G-20; Alliance on Cotton; Alliance on Singapore Issues – How to consolidate it further? • After Cancun, developed countries cannot take developing countries for granted – Be proactive in negotiations. www.cuts-international.org