1 / 13

Social Comparison Direction

Upward social comparison- compare to someone who is better than you. Downward social comparison- compare to someone who is worse than you. Social Comparison Direction. Contrast.

lena
Télécharger la présentation

Social Comparison Direction

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Upward social comparison- compare to someone who is better than you. Downward social comparison- compare to someone who is worse than you. Social Comparison Direction

  2. Contrast • Contrast effect – self is contrasted to the target of comparison and thus self-evaluations move away from the target.

  3. Upward social comparison- compare to someone who is better than you. Downward social comparison- compare to someone who is worse than you. Contrast Effect Results Feel worse Feel better

  4. Assimilation effects • Assimilation effect- Self-evaluations move towards the target of comparison.

  5. Upward social comparison- compare to someone who is better than you. Downward social comparison- compare to someone who is worse than you. Assimilation Effect Results Feel better Feel worse

  6. Predicting Contrast vs. Assimilation Tesser’s Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model Results depend on: • Psychological closeness • Relevance of the dimension

  7. Self-Evaluation Maintenance Ratings of Positivity in Perception

  8. Predicting Assimilation vs. Contrast Lockwood & Kunda (1997) Results depend on: • Relevance • Attainability

  9. Lockwood & Kunda (1997)

  10. Automaticity Automatic processes are well learned and require little or no conscious attention. Is social comparison an automatic process? If so, people should be able to compare even under cognitive load.

  11. Gilbert et al. (1995) • Schizophrenia detection task • First watched confederate perform well (16/18) or poorly (4/18) • But confederate was deliberately trained or misinformed, so the comparison is non-diagnostic. • Half of the participants are under cognitive load. • All participants took test and got 10/18

  12. Gilbert’s theory No Cognitive load: Correction: Comparison is non-diagnostic Compare to confederate No effect On self-evaluation Cognitive load: Unable to correct Effect on Self-evaluation Compare to confederate

  13. Gilbert et al. (1995) Results (self-evaluations of performance) Not busy: No significant effect of comparison direction. Busy: Significant contrast effect.

More Related