1 / 11

The Availability Heuristic

The Availability Heuristic. “assess the frequency of a class or the probability of an event by the ease with which instances or occurrences can be brought to mind” (T&K, 74: 1127). “Availability heuristic”. Events that are easy to imaging “spring to mind” are judged to be more frequent

leonard-fuller
Télécharger la présentation

The Availability Heuristic

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Availability Heuristic “assess the frequency of a class or the probability of an event by the ease with which instances or occurrences can be brought to mind” (T&K, 74: 1127)

  2. “Availability heuristic” • Events that are easy to imaging • “spring to mind” • are judged to be more frequent • I.e.., highly vivid, • emotional • can be imagined

  3. Example: Availability bias • Which is more likely cause of death in US? • killed by falling airplane parts? • shark attack

  4. Implications: What more probable (plausible) • Media coverage (crime rate ) • Events easy to image (terrorist attack) • Events/outcome the are difficult to visualize • (interaction effects)

  5. Are easily imagined events judged to be more probable? • Carroll (1978) • 1976 election • Imagine Carter wins • or • Imagine Ford wins • …predict “Who is likely to win?”

  6. What if event is extremely negative? • DENIAL • nuclear war • AIDS • Environmental disasters • Global “warming • “rape of Indian Ocean”

  7. how concrete or imaginable something is visuals TV “face-to-face” communications What course to take? Recommend Not Condition Face-to face 4.73 .50 No eval- uation 3.33 1.39 Base rate 4.11 .94 (Borgida & Nisbett, 1977) VIVIDNESS

  8. Pallid condition: “On his way out the door, Sanders (the defendant) staggered against a serving table, knocking a bowl to the floor” Vivid version: “On his way out the door, Sanders staggered against a serving table, knocking a bowl of guacamole dip to the floor and splattering guacamole on the white shag carpet.” Legal Significance?(during jury deliberations?)

  9. Why? Delayed effect • Vivid information easier to remember • Easier to retrieve from memory • “Vivid events may be judged more probable”

  10. TYPE of INFORMATION • Most likely to be remembers……> • more persuasive (delayed effect) • Case histories (versus stat abstract) • Video (versus written oral • presentations) • Personal experience • “VALID, RELIABLE, TIMELY”

  11. How to use these insights? • Publicize explicit but non-obvious comparisons: • “More people will die from stomach cancer than from car accidents”

More Related